Finite Element Modeling of Deformation Behavior of Steel Specimens under Various Loading Scenarios

Article Preview

Abstract:

Lightweighting materials (e.g., advanced high strength steels, aluminum alloys etc.) are increasingly being used by automotive companies as sheet metal components. However, accurate material models are needed for wider adoption. These constitutive material data are often developed by applying biaxial strain paths with cross-shaped (cruciform) specimens. Optimizing the design of specimens is a major goal in which finite element (FE) analysis can play a major role. However, verification of FE models is necessary. Calibrating models against uniaxial tensile tests is a logical first step. In the present study, reliable stress-strain data up to failure are developed by using digital image correlation (DIC) technique for strain measurement and X-ray techniques and/or force data for stress measurement. Such data are used to model the deformation behavior in uniaxial and biaxial tensile specimens. Model predictions of strains and displacements are compared with experimental data. The role of imperfections on necking behavior in FE modeling results of uniaxial tests is discussed. Computed results of deformation, strain profile, and von Mises plastic strain agree with measured values along critical paths in the cruciform specimens. Such a calibrated FE model can be used to obtain an optimum cruciform specimen design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

969-974

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Foecke, M.A. Iadicola, A. Lin, S.W. Banovic, A method for direct measurement of multiaxial stress-strain curves in sheet metal, Metall. Mater Trans. 38A (2007) 306–313.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-006-9044-y

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. Iadicola, T. Foecke, S.W. Banovic, Experimental observations of evolving yield loci in biaxially strained AA 5754-O, Int. J. Plasticity. 24(2008) 2084–2101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.003

Google Scholar

[3] W. Mü̈ller, K. Pöhlandt, New experiments for determining yield loci of sheet metal, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 60 (1996) 643–648.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02399-0

Google Scholar

[4] C.C. Tasan, J.P.M. Hoefnagels, G. Quaak, M.G.D. Geers, In-Plane biaxial loading of sheet metal until fracture, Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), Orlando, FL, (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] E. Hoferlin, A.V. Bael, P.V. Houtte, G. Steyaert, C.D. Mare, The design of a biaxial tensile test and its use for the validation of crystallographic yield loci, Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 8 (2000) 423–433.

DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/8/4/302

Google Scholar

[6] T. Kuwabara, A. Bael, E. Iizuka, Measurement and analysis of yield locus and work hardening characteristics of steel sheets with different r-values, Acta Mater. 50 (2002) 3717–3729.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00184-2

Google Scholar

[7] F. Abu-Farha, L.G. Hector, M. Khraisheh, Cruciform-shaped specimens for elevated temperature biaxial testing of lightweight materials, JOM 61 (2009) 48–56.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-009-0121-8

Google Scholar

[8] NIST Center for Automotive Lightweighting, http: /www. nist. gov/lightweighting.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Banerjee, M. Iadicola, A. Creuziger, T. Foecke, An Experimental and Numerical Study of Deformation Behavior of Steels in Biaxial Tensile Tests, to be published in TMS 2015 Conference Proceedings, Warrendale, PA.

DOI: 10.1002/9781119093466.ch35

Google Scholar

[10] ABAQUS 12. 2 software. Dassault Systemes. http: /www. 3ds. com.

Google Scholar

[11] J.W. Kim, T.S. Byun, Analysis of necking deformation and fracture characteristics of irradiated A533B RPV steel, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 44 (2012) 953-960.

DOI: 10.5516/net.07.2012.012

Google Scholar

[12] M.A. Iadicola, A.A. Creuziger, T. Foecke, Advanced biaxial cruciform testing at the NIST Center for Automotive Lightweighting, SEM , (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00876-9_34

Google Scholar