Paper Titles

Ductility of Ultra-High Performance Concrete and its Correlation with Tensile Strength Increase
p.21

Rheological Study of the Performance and the Vulnerability of an Element of RC Structure during and after a Seismic Signal
p.25

Experimental Tensile Tests on Bone Cement: Effect of Test Sample Shape
p.29

On the Influence of the Contact Force and the Angle between the Wires on ACSR Conductors’ Mechanical Properties and Durability
p.33

Light Alloys Structural Behaviour in Severe Environmental Conditions
p.37

Evaluation of Bond Strength between Steel Fiber Reinforced Ultra-High Strength Concrete and Rebar
p.41

Boundary Element Analysis of Stiffened Panels with Repair Patches
p.45

Different Inclusion Contents in H13 Steel: Effects on VHCF Response of Gaussian Specimens
p.49

Mixed-Mode Crack Patterns in Ordinary State-Based Peridynamics
p.53

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 665Light Alloys Structural Behaviour in Severe...

Light Alloys Structural Behaviour in Severe Environmental Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

High strength-to-mass ratio light alloys, such as 7075-T6 aluminium alloys and Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloys, are commonly adopted for high performance structural components in the aeronautic, automotive and maritime sectors. For this reason, it is crucial to investigate the effects of the external environment on their mechanical properties, to avoid dramatic component failure. In the present work, experimental tests were performed on Ti-6Al-4V and 7075-T6 light alloys. Ti-6Al-4V notched flat dogbone specimens, with K_t = 1.18, were tested for quasi-static and SCC effects in a methanol-water aggressive environment at different concentrations. Rotating bending R = -1 fatigue tests were performed on 7075-T6 in air and methanol environment, to evaluate the effects of an aggressive environment on the fatigue strength at 200’000 cycles. The influence of DLC and WC/C PVD coatings on fatigue limit at 200’000 cycles has been evaluated in air and aggressive environment, to assess their mechanical and protective effects on the 7075-T6 substrate

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics XIV

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 665)

Pages:

37-40

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.665.37

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2015

Authors:

Sergio Baragetti, Riccardo Gerosa, Francesco Villa

Keywords:

7075-T6, Corrosion, Mechanical Properties, PVD, Ti-6Al-4V

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Hirsch. Materials Transactions 52(5): 818-24, (2011).

[2] S. Lomolino, R. Tovo, J. dos Santos. Int. J. Fatigue 27: 305-16, (2005).

[3] S. Baragetti, G. D'Urso. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 28(3): 867-77, (2013).

[4] M. Kumar, N. Sotirov, C.M. Chimani. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 214: 1769-76, (2014).

[5] B.F. Brown: Stress Corrosion Cracking in High Strength Steels and in Titanium and Aluminum Alloys. Washington D.C., Naval Research Lab, (1972).

[6] G. Silva, B. Rivolta, R. Gerosa, U. Derudi. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22(1): 210-4, (2013).

[7] K. K. Sankaran, R. Perez, K. V. Jata. Mater. Sci. Eng. A297: 223-9, (2001).

[8] K. Genel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 32: 248-60, (2013).

[9] E.S. Puchi-Cabrera, M.H. Staia, J. Lesage, et al. Int. J. Fatigue 30: 1220-30, (2008).

[10] S. Baragetti, R. Gerosa, F. Villa. 43rd AIAS Conference Proceedings, Rimini, 9-12 Sept. (2014).

[11] S. Baragetti, R. Gerosa, F. Villa. Key Eng. Mat. 627: 81-4, (2015).

[12] S. Baragetti, R. Gerosa, F. Villa. Submitted to Eng. Fract. Mech., (2015).

[13] R. H. Oskouei, R. N. Ibrahim. Procedia Eng. 10: 1936–42, (2011).

[14] G. Lütjering and J. C. Williams: Titanium - 2nd ed. Berlin, Springer, (2007).

[15] R. W. Schutz. H. B. Watkins. Mater. Sci. Eng. A243: 305-15, (1998).

[16] R. W. Schutz. NACE Corrosion 2001 Conference Paper No. 01003, (2001).

[17] I. Gurrappa. Mater. Charact. 51: 131-9, (2003).

[18] S. P. Trasatti, E. Sivieri. Mater. Chem. Phys. 92: 475-9, (2005).

[19] G. Sanderson, J. C. Scully. Corros. Sci. 8: 541-8, (1968).

[20] D. B. Dawson. Metall. Trans. 12A: 791-800, (1981).

[21] S. Baragetti. Surf. Interface Anal. 45: 1654-58, (2013).

[22] S. Baragetti, R. Gerosa, F. Villa. Submitted to Corros. Rev., (2015).

[23] C. Soares: Gas Turbines. Amsterdam: Elsevier, (2008).

[24] ISO 1143: 2010 Standard. Metallic materials — Rotating bar bending fatigue testing, (2010).

[25] Lafer: www. lafer. eu, (2015).

[26] Matweb, www. matweb. com, (2015).

[27] T. Nicholas. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 25: 861-9, (2002).

[28] R. S. Bellows, S. Muju, T. Nicholas. Int. J. Fatigue 21: 687-97, (1999).