Comparison of Compressive Strength and Young’s Modulus of Cement Samples with Different Types of Aggregate

Article Preview

Abstract:

Several different types of aggregates were used for production of tested samples, namely: the standard sand of a fraction 0-4 mm, quartz sand of a fraction 0-0.4 mm, finely ground recycled limestone powder of a fraction 0-0.07 mm, finely ground recycled concrete of a fraction 0-0.13 mm (ground by Lavaris Company), and finally crushed bricks of a fraction 2-5 mm. The Portland cement CEM I 42.5 R produced in Radotín was used as a binder. Testing was carried out on prismatic samples of dimensions 40 × 40 × 160 mm. Compressive strength and static Young ́s modulus were measured for individual samples and these differed by the type of a microfiller and its amount.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

207-210

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Seps, J. Vodicka, Fibre Reinforced Concrete with Recycled Concrete and Insulation Material STERED, Special Concrete and Composites 1054 (2014) 162–266.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1054.262

Google Scholar

[2] L. Evangelista, J. Brito, Mechanical behavior of concrete made with fine recycled concrete aggregates, Cement and Concrete Composites 29 (2007) 397–401.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.004

Google Scholar

[3] E.F. Ledesmaa et al., Properties of masonry mortars manufactured with fine recycled concrete aggregates, Construction and Building Materials 71 (2014) 289–298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.080

Google Scholar

[4] V. Nežerka et al., Comprehensive study on mechanical properties of lime-based pastes with additions of metakaolin and brick dust, Cement and Concrete Research 64 (2014) 17–29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.006

Google Scholar

[5] V. Nežerka et al., Investigation of crushed brick-matrix interface in lime-based ancient mortar by microscopy and nanoindentation, Cement and Concrete Research 55 (2015) 122–128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.023

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lidmila et al., Mechanical Properties of Recycled Binder/Micro-Filler Cement-Based Material, Advanced Materials Research 1054 (2014) 234–237.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1054.234

Google Scholar

[7] M. Lidmila et al., Utilization of Recycled Fine-ground Concrete from Railway Sleepers for Production of Cement-Based Binder, Applied Mechanics and Materials 486 (2014) 323–326.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.486.323

Google Scholar

[8] M. Lidmila et al., Utilization of Recycled Binder for Improvement of Subsoil under Railway Sleepers, in. Proceedings of the 51st Conference on Experimental Stress Analysis, 2013, ISBN 978-80-7414-579-7.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Lidmila et al., Composite Material Based on Cement and PVA: Evolution of Mechanical Properties During First 28 Days, Advanced Materials Research 1054 (2014) 215–220.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1054.215

Google Scholar

[10] J. Topič et al., Effect of PVA Modification on the Properties of Cement Based Composite, Acta Polytechnica 55 (1) (2015) 64–75.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Tesárek et al., Micromechanical properties of different materials on gypsum basis, Chemicke Listy, 106 (2012) s547-s548. ISSN 0009-2770.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Tesárek, J. Němeček, Microstructural and micromechanical study of gypsum, Chemicke Listy, 105 (2011) s852-s853.

Google Scholar