Powder Injection Molding of Mullite: The Study of Mechanical and Physical Properties of the Sintered Products Using Statistical Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this work is to propose the application of statistical methods (linear regression and statistical hypothesis test) to analyze the effect of parameters used in powder injection molding including sintering temperature and the feedstock composition on the flexural strength, the porosity and the density of the sintered specimens of mullite prepared by powder injection molding (PIM) and using the composite binder consisting of 80 wt% polyethylene glycol (PEG) and 20 wt% polyvinyl butyral (PVB) for molding. The lab-scale plunger type PIM machine was used to prepare the specimens. The feedstock compositions were 50 to 54 vol% mullite, and the sintering temperatures were 1300 and 1400 °C. At level of significance 0.05 for statistical analysis, feedstock composition did not affect flexural strength, porosity, and density of the sintered specimens. For sintering temperature, the specimens sintered at 1400 °C have the greater density and the lower porosity. However, the flexural strength of the specimens sintered at 1300 °C and 1400 °C are statistically similar.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

92-96

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Asthana, A. Kumar, and N. B. Dahotre, Materials Science in Manufacturing, first ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] B.C. Mutsuddy, R.G. Ford, Ceramic Injection Molding, Springer, (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] N. Chuankrerkkul, P. Chakartnarodom, Fabrication of Injection Moulded 304L Stainless Steels Reinforced with Tungsten Carbide Particles, Mater. Sci. Forum 706-709 (2012) 638-642.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.706-709.638

Google Scholar

[5] R.E. Walpole, R.H. Myers, Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, fifth ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, (1993).

Google Scholar

[6] I. Bass, Six Sigma Statistics with Excel and Minitab, McGraw-Hill, (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] D.J. Duval, S.H. Risbud, J.F. Shackelford, Mullite, in: J.F. Shackelford and R.H. Doremus (eds. ), Ceramic and Glass Materials: Structure, Properties and Processing, Springer, 2008, pp.27-39.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73362-3_2

Google Scholar

[8] I.A. Aksay, D.M. Dabbs, and M. Sarikaya, Mullite for Structural, Electronic, and Optical Applications, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 2343-2358.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06768.x

Google Scholar

[9] E. Bernardo, P. Colombo, E. Pippel, J. Woltersdorf, Novel Mullite Synthesis Based on Alumina Nanoparticles and a Preceramic Polymer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 (2006) 1577–1583.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00963.x

Google Scholar

[10] P. Chakartnarodom, N. Chuankrerkkul, Statistical Analysis of Binder Behavior during Debinding Step in Powder Injection Molding (PIM), Adv. Mat. Res. 970 (2014) 172-176.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.970.172

Google Scholar

[11] P. Chakartnarodom, N. Kongkajun, P. Senthongkaew, Application of Numerical Method and Statistical Analysis in the Integrated Intensity Calculation of the Peaks from the X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Pattern of a-Iron, Key. Eng. Mat. 659 (2015) 350-354.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.659.350

Google Scholar

[12] J.G. Gutiérrez, J.B. Stringari, I. Emri, Powder Injection Molding of Metal and Ceramic Parts, in J. Wang (Ed. ), Some Critical Issues for Injection Molding, InTech, pp.65-89.

DOI: 10.5772/38070

Google Scholar

[13] W.D. Callister, Jr., D.G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, eighth edition, John Wiley and Sons, (2009).

Google Scholar