Research on FBE Grinding Device of Deepwater Multifunctional Pipeline Repair Machinery

Article Preview

Abstract:

Deepwater pipeline repairing machine (DPRM) is an appropriative equipment which is used to repair damaged deepwater oil and gas pipelines. With the development of deepwater oil and gas exploitation, inventions of such kinds of equipments are urgent priorities. Grinding technology is used in DPRM to remove pipeline anticorrosive coating. It is easy to cut the pipeline excessively when grinding pipeline anticorrosive coating for large orality of deepwater pipelines, which is not conducive to use mechanical connector to seal the pipeline. In order to settle this problem, the rotating compliant mechanism is designed and the grinding tool is steel wire brush. Based on the theory of boundary layer, the underwater rotating mechanical model of grinding tools is established to gain the relationship between grinding drag torque and grinding tool radius, rotational speed, and positive pressure. The grinding experiment gives the effect of structural parameters of steel wire brush on removing anticorrosive coating and indicates that medium density bowl type steel wire brush is the best choice. Finally, the grinding pipeline anticorrosive coating test is completed to verify the rationality of the design of grinding device. These studies provide technical basis for the development of deepwater multifunctional pipeline repair machinery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

385-394

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F.H. Liang, A.H. Li, Y.X. Zhang, C.S. Miao, J.Y. Chen, China Offshore Oil and Gas, J. Vol. 21(2009), 352-357.

Google Scholar

[2] Q.M. Chen, Z.P. Li, Material & Heat Treatment, J. Vol. 39(2010), 41-43.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Carlo Maria, B. Giuseppe, F. Sergio, Proceedings of the 2009 International Offshore and Polar Engineering conference, 584-593.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Carlo Maria, F. Sergio, Global Pipeline Monthly, J. Ei. Vol. 4(2008), 9-12.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Vincent, F. Ian, Oil and Gas Journal, J. Ei. Vol. 100(2002), 96-104.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Li, Y.P. Ji, X.D. Jiao, etal, China Petroleum Machinery,J. Vol. 41(2013), 57-60.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Fassina, M. guagliano, L. Lazzari, L. vergani and M. vimercati, Engineering Failure Analysis, J. Ei. Vol. 12(2005), 711-719.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.009

Google Scholar

[8] K. Edgar, P. Bo, R. Marcio, M. Helena, Proceedings of the 2011 Offshore Technology Conference, 49-65.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Rob, K. Joseph, C. Bruce, Proceedings of the 2004 Offshore Technology Conference, 1426-1435.

Google Scholar

[10] C. David S, Pipeline & Gas Journal, J. Ei. Vol. 228(2001), 44-46.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Colin, N. David, Journal of Protective Coatings and Linings, J. Ei. Vol. 24(2007), 63-77.

Google Scholar

[12] L.Q. Wang, J.B. Dong , L. Zhang, Natural Gas Industry, J. Ei. Vol. 32(2012), 75-78.

Google Scholar

[13] Y.M. Li, Q.F. Wang, Underwater Technology, J. Ei. Vol. 26(2005), 89-96.

Google Scholar

[14] Q.F. Wang, Y.M. LI, T.Y. Zhong , G.H. Xu, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition), J. Sci. Vol. 18(2005), 419-423.

Google Scholar

[15] V. karman, Zeit Angew Math Mech, J. Sci. Vol. 1(1921), 233-252.

Google Scholar