Fabrication and Characterization of Porcine Bone-Derived Hydroxyapatite-Alumina Biocomposite

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main function of a bone graft is to support bone in growth, to induce bone healing, and to facilitate bone regeneration. Synthetic bone grafts are used since it can be easily modified according to the properties needed for a good bone substitute. For this study, a hydroxyapatite-alumina biocomposite was fabricated via sintering at 1000 °C. Hydroxyapatite (HAp) was extracted from porcine bones by means of calcination. Amounts of HAp, alumina, and starch were varied to determine the compositional effects in mechanical properties and biocompatibility. The produced biocomposites were found to be compact and solid with minimal pores at the surface. Also, surface grains vary in sizes. Compression tests were done and the calculated maximum stresses range from 45.46 to 219.02 MPa. The sample with 80wt% HAp-10wt% alumina-10wt% starch has the best compressive strength. While the three-day immersion test using simulated body fluid yielded positive results as the samples were found to be stable with the highest weight loss being only 2.36%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

260-264

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Philippine Medical Device Market,. Last modified 2014. Accessed August 2014. http: /www. ita. doc. gov/td/health/philippines_meddev05. pdf.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Hollinger, An Introduction To Biomaterials. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011. Print.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Pramanik, A. Tarafdar, and P. Pramanik, Capping Agent-Assisted Synthesis of Nanosized Hydroxyapatite: Comparative Studies of Their Physicochemical Properties,. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 184, no. 1-3 (2007): 131-138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.013

Google Scholar

[4] S. Y. Ivanov, R. F. Mukhametshin, A. A. Muraev, and D. V. Solodkaya, Synthetic Materials Used for the Substitution of Bone Defects: Critical Review. Annals Of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery.,. Oapublishinglondon. Com. Last modified 2013. Accessed August 2014. https: /www. oapublishinglondon. com/article/398.

DOI: 10.13172/2052-7837-1-1-398

Google Scholar

[5] H. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Zuo, J. Li, S. Ma, and L. Cheng, Biocompatibility and Osteogenesis of Biomimetic Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide Composite Scaffolds For Bone Tissue Engineering,. Biomaterials 28, no. 22 (2007): 3338-3348.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.014

Google Scholar

[6] M. Navarro, A. Michiardi, O. Castano, and J. Planell, Biomaterials in Orthopaedics,. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5, no. 27 (2008): 1137-1158.

DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0151

Google Scholar

[7] A. Maho, S. Linden, C. Arnould, S. Detriche, J. Delhalle, and Z. Mekhalif, Tantalum Oxide/Carbon Nanotubes Composite Coatings on Titanium, and Their Functionalization with Organophosphonic Molecular Films: A High Quality Scaffold for Hydroxyapatite Growth,. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 371, no. 1 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.066

Google Scholar

[8] G. Singh, H. Singh, and B. S. Sidhu, Corrosion Behavior of Plasma Sprayed Hydroxyapatite And Hydroxyapatite-Silicon Oxide Coatings On AISI 304 For Biomedical Application,. Applied Surface Science 284 (2013): 811-818.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.013

Google Scholar

[9] K. R. Mohamed, H. H. Beherei, G. T. El Bassyouni, and N. El Mahallawy, Fabrication and Mechanical Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite/Oxide Nano-Composite Materials,. Materials Science and Engineering: C 33, no. 7 (2013): 4126-4132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.05.059

Google Scholar

[10] S. Ramesh, C. Tan, C. Peralta, and W. Teng, The Effect of Manganese Oxide on the Sinterability of Hydroxyapatite,. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 8, no. 4 (2007): 257-263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.stam.2007.02.006

Google Scholar

[11] I. Sopyan, M. Mel, S. Ramesh, and K. Khalid, Porous Hydroxyapatite for Artificial Bone Applications,. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 8, no. 1-2 (2007): 116-123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.stam.2006.11.017

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM International. 2014. Standard Guide for Characterization of Ceramic and Mineral Based Scaffolds used for Tissue-Engineered Medical Products (TEMPs) and as Device for Surgical Implant Applications.

DOI: 10.1520/f2883

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM International. 2014. Standard Test Method for in vitro Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical Implants.

DOI: 10.1520/f1635-11

Google Scholar

[14] J. Schiel and D. Hage, Density Measurements of Potassium Phosphate Buffer from 4 to 45 ˚C,. Talanta 65, no. 2 (2005): 495-500.

DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.029

Google Scholar

[15] G. Tripathi and B. Basu, A Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffold For Bone Tissue Engineering: Physico-Mechanical And Biological Evaluations,. Ceramics International 38, no. 1 (2012): 341-349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.07.012

Google Scholar

[16] E. Gómez-Barrena, P. Rosset, D. Lozano, J. Stanovici, C. Ermthaller, and F. Gerbhard, Bone Fracture Healing: Cell Therapy in Delayed Unions And Nonunions,. Bone 70 (2015): 93-101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.033

Google Scholar