Numerical Analysis of Aluminium Perforated Shear Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Metal perforated shear plates have been proposed in the last recent years as a suitable solution for passive protection of buildings in seismic-prone zones. The use of soft aluminum alloys seems to be particularly convenient for these special devices. In fact, on the one hand, the low yield strength of the base material allows to control more easily the structural performance without the necessity of large weakening of the base plate. On the other hand, the high ductility that some annealed alloys are able to provide allows significant inelastic deformations, this leading to an appreciable dissipative behavior of the device. In this paper a parametric numerical analysis on pure aluminum perforated shear panels is presented with the aim of examining the panel responses for several arrangements of perforations for different shear deformation demands. In particular, the influence of geometrical parameters related to the hole configuration is investigated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

238-243

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] De Matteis G. Effect of lightweight cladding panels on the seismic performance of moment resisting steel frames, Engineering Structures, Vol 27, Issue 11 (2005) pp.1662-167.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.004

Google Scholar

[2] De Matteis, G., Mazzolani, F.M., Panico, S. Experimental tests on pure aluminium shear panels with welded stiffeners, Engineering Structures, 30, 6 (2008), pp.1734-44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.015

Google Scholar

[3] De Matteis, G., Formisano, A., Mazzolani, F.M. An innovative methodology for seismic retrofitting of existing RC buildings by metal shear panels. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 38, 1 (2009), pp.61-78.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.841

Google Scholar

[4] De Matteis G., Brando G., Panico S., Mazzolani F.M. Bracing type pure aluminium stiffened shear panels: An experimental study. Advanced Steel Construction, 5, 2, (2009) pp.106-119.

DOI: 10.4203/ccp.86.144

Google Scholar

[5] Brando, G., De Matteis, G. Design of low strength-high hardening metal multi-stiffened shear plates. Engineering Structures 60 (2014) PP. 2 - 10 doi: 10. 1016/j. engstruct. 2013. 12. 005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.005

Google Scholar

[6] Brando, G., D'Agostino, F., De Matteis, G. Experimental tests of a new hysteretic damper made of buckling inhibited shear panels. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions 46, 12, (2013) PP. 2121 – 2133. doi: 10. 1617/s11527-013-0040-6.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0040-6

Google Scholar

[7] Zirakian, T., Zhang, J. Structural performance of unstiffened low yield point steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 112 (2015), pp.40-53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.023

Google Scholar

[8] Valizadeh, H., Sheidaii, M., Showkati, H. Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70 (2012), pp.308-316.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.09.016

Google Scholar

[9] Chan, R.W.K., Albermani, F., Kitipornchai, S. Experimental study of perforated yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation (2013) Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 91, pp.14-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.08.013

Google Scholar

[10] Vian, D., Bruneau, M., Purba, R. Special perforated steel plate shear walls with reduced beam section anchor beams. II: Analysis and design recommendations (2009) Journal of Structural Engineering, 135 (3), pp.221-228.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2009)135:3(221)

Google Scholar

[11] Formisano A., Lombardi L. Numerical prediction of the non-linear behaviour of perforated metal shear panels. Cogent Engineering. Volume 3, Issue 1, (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1156279

Google Scholar

[12] De Matteis, G., Sarracco, G., Brando, G. Experimental tests and optimization rules for steel perforated shear panels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research (2016), 123, pp.41-52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.04.025

Google Scholar

[13] De Matteis G., Brando G., Mazzolani F.M. Pure aluminium: An innovative material for structural applications in seismic engineering. Construction and Building Materials, 26-1 (2012), pp.677-686.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.071

Google Scholar

[15] Brando G., De Matteis G. Experimental and numerical analysis of a multi-stiffened pure aluminium shear panel. Thin-Walled Structures, 49, 10 (2011). pp.1277-1287.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.05.007

Google Scholar

[16] ECCS-CECM. Recommended testing procedure for assessing the behaviour of structural steel elements under cyclic loads, (1985).

Google Scholar