Achieving Concrete Durability in Chloride Exposures

Abstract:

Obtaining durability in concrete structures over a long service life in chloride exposures requires knowledge of the concrete properties, relevant transport processes, depths of cover as well as minimization of cracking and construction defects. For example, imperfect curing can result in depth-dependent effects of the concrete cover’s resistance to chloride ingress. Several service life models with various levels of sophistication exist for prediction of time-to-corrosion of concrete structures exposed to chlorides. The model inputs have uncertainty associated with them such as boundary conditions (level of saturation and temperature), cover depths, diffusion coefficients, time-dependent changes, and rates of buildup of chlorides at the surface. The performance test methods used to obtain predictive model inputs as well as how models handle these properties have a dramatic impact on predicted service lives. Very few models deal with the influence of cracks or the fact that concrete in the cover zone will almost certainly have a higher diffusion coefficient than the bulk concrete as the result of imperfect curing or compaction. While many models account for variability in input properties, they will never be able to account for extremes in construction defects. Therefore, to ensure the reliability of service life predictions and to attain a concrete structure that achieves its predicted potential, designers, contractors and suppliers need to work together, using proper inspection, to ensure proper detailing, minimize defects, and adopt adequate, yet achievable, curing procedures. As well, concrete structures are often exposed to other destructive elements in addition to chlorides (eg. freezing or ASR) and this adds another level of complexity since regardless of cause, cracks will accelerate the ingress of chlorides. These issues are discussed along with the need to use performance-based specifications together with predictive models.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 711)
• Pages: 607-614
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.607
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: R. Douglas Hooton*
• Keywords: Chloride Ingress, Construction Defects, Cracks, Diffusion, Performance Specifications, Uncertainty

References

[1] Marchand, J., Samson, E. et al., Predicting the performance of concrete structures exposed to chemically aggressive environment—Field validation, Matls. Struct. 35(10) (2002) 623-631.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02480355

[2] Maltais, Y. Marchand, J. et al., Predicting the durability of portland cement systems in aggressive environments – Laboratory validation, Cem. Conc. Res. 34(9) (2004) 1579-1589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.03.029

[3] DuraCrete, Probabilistic Performance Based Durability Design of Concrete Structures, Final Technical Report, EU-Project-Euram III Doc. No. BE95-1347/R17, (2000).

[4] Ehlen, M.A., Thomas, M.D.A. et al., Life-365 Service Life Prediction Model Version 2. 0, Conc. Intl. 31(2) (2009) 41-46.

[5] Angst, U., Elsener, B., Larsen, B.K., Vennesland, O., Critical Chloride Content in Reinforced Concrete—A Review, Cem. Conc. Res. 39 (2009) 1122-1138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.006

[6] fib Model Code for Concrete Structures, Intl. Federation for Structural Concrete 2010, Geneva, Switzerland.

[7] Hooton, R.D., Bentz, E.C., Kojundic, T., Long-Term Chloride Penetration Resistance of Silica Fume Concretes Based on Field Exposure, RILEM e-Proceedings, Service Life Design for Infrastructure 2010, TUDelft (2010).

[8] Bickley, J.A., Hooton, R.D., Hover, K.C., Preparation of a Performance-Based Specification for Cast-In-Place Concrete, Report, RMC Research & Education Foundation (2006), 168p. http: /www. nrmca. org/p2p.

[9] Hooton, R.D., Hover, K.C., and Bickley, J.A., Performance Standards and Specifications for Concrete for Promotion of Sustainable Construction, Proc. CONSEC'07, 1 (2007) 815-830.

[10] Hooton, R.D., Bickley, J.A., Hover, K.C., Specifying and Achieving High Performance in Concrete Structures, e-Proc. 9th Intl. Conf. on High Performance Concrete, New Zealand (2011).

[11] CSA A23. 1-14, (2014) Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction, Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

[12] Rilem TC 189-NEC, Non-destructive evaluation of the concrete cover, Part I-Comparative test of penetrability methods, Matls. Struct. 38 (2005) 895-906; and update in Matls. Struct. 41 (2008) 443-447.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9334-x

[13] Buenfeld, N.R., Shurafa-Daoudi, M-T., McLoughlin, I.M., Chloride Transport due to Wick Action in Concrete, in Chloride Penetration into Concrete, Proc. RILEM Intl. Workshop, St-Remy-les Chevreuse, France, October (1995) 315-324.

DOI: 10.1617/2912143454.032

[14] Nokken, M.R., Hooton, R.D., Evaporative Transport of Chlorides in Concrete, Proc., Concrete Under Severe Environments, CONSEC'01, Vancouver, 1 (2001) 357-364.

[15] Aldred, J.M., Rangan, B.V., Buenfeld, N.R., Effect of Initial Moisture Content on Wick Action through Concrete, Cem. Conc. Res., 34 (2004) 907-912.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00202-3

[16] ASTM C1556-11a, Standard Test Method for Determining the Apparent Chloride Diffusion Coefficient of Cementitious Mixtures by Bulk Diffusion, ASTM Annual Book of Standards, V. 04. 02, ASTM Intl. 100 Barr Harbor Dr., P.O. Box C-700, West Conshohocken, PA USA (2015).

DOI: 10.1520/c1556

[17] Nordtest NT Build 443, Accelerated Chloride Penetration. P.O. Box 116, FIN-02151 Espoo Finland.

[18] ASTM C1585-13, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes, ASTM Annual Book of Standards, V. 04. 02, ASTM Intl. 100 Barr Harbor Dr., P.O. Box C-700, West Conshohocken, PA USA (2015).

[19] ASTM C1202-12, Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete's ability to resist chloride ion penetration, ASTM Annual Book of Standards, V. 04. 02, ASTM Intl. 100 Barr Harbor Dr., P.O. Box C-700, West Conshohocken, PA USA (2015).

DOI: 10.1520/jte12075j

[20] Nordtest NTBuild 492, Chloride Migration Coefficient from Non-Steady-State Migration Experiments, P.O. Box 116, FIN-02151 Espoo Finland (1999).

[21] Hooton, R.D., Charmchi, G., Karkar, E., Development and Standardization of Rapid Methods for Assessing the Fluid Penetration Resistance of Concrete, e-Proc. XIII Intl. Conf. on the Durability of Building Materials, Sao Paolo, Brazil (2014).

[22] Hooton, R.D., Charmchi, G., Adoption of Resistivity Tests for Concrete Acceptance, ACI Special Pub. SP-303, Proc. Recent Advances in Concrete Technology and Sustainability Issues, Ottawa, July 2015 269-279.

DOI: 10.14359/51688139

[23] Alexander, M. G., Ballim, Y., Stanish, K., A framework for use of durability indexes in performance-based design and specifications for reinforced concrete structures, Matls. Struct. 41(5) (2008) 921-936.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9295-0

[24] Lane, D. S., Detwiler, R. J., Hooton, R. D., Testing transport properties in concrete, Concrete Intl. 32(11) (2012) 33-38.

[25] Bognacki, C. J., Pirozzi, M., Marsano, J., Scriffiano, A., Increasing the services lives of concrete pavements, Concrete Intl. 34(1) (2012) 27-33.

[26] Hooton, R. D., Bickley, J. A., Prescriptive versus performance approaches for durability design - The end of innocence?, Matls. Corrosion 63(12) (2012) 1097-1101.

DOI: 10.1002/maco.201206780

[27] Tikalsky, P., Pustka, D., Marek, P. Statistical Variations in Chloride diffusion in concrete Bridges, ACI Struct. J. 102(3) (2005) 481-486.

[28] Hooton, R.D., Geiker, M.R., Bentz, E.C., Effects of Curing on Chloride Ingress and Implications of Service Life, ACI Matls. J. 99 (2002) 201-206.

[29] Hooton, R.D., Bickley, J.A., Design for Durability: The Key to Improving Concrete Sustainability, Const. Bldg. Matls. 67 (2014) 422-430.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.016