Influence of Embedded through Section Connectors on the Behavior of a New Strengthening Technique for Concrete Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

An innovative technique is being developed for the structural rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures. In particular, the infill walls of RC framed structures are often identified as non-structural elements, but currently are considered with an important role in the structural behavior because they participate to the in-plane strength and stiffness of the frames and they can give very dangerous crashes out-of-plane. In this paper a strengthening technique aimed to repair infill walls is proposed. It is based on the application of outer thin layers of ultra-high ductile fiber reinforced mortar (UHDFRM) applied according to the shotcrete technique, including the use of embedded through section (ETS) connectors. This strengthening system can exhibit a high strength and ductile behavior, increase the load carrying capacity, energy absorption and dissipation capacities, and ultimately improve the structural response of RC structures when submitted to loading conditions typical of seismic events. An experimental program was outlined in order to assess the contribution of different types of ETS connectors on the behavior of the strengthening system. The experimental program comprised the performance of push-out tests on samples representative of the structural strengthening solution, namely low strength concrete samples. The experimental results are discussed in detail in order to highlight the effectiveness of the various types of ETS connectors tested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

996-1003

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake esistance Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, vol. NP EN 1998–1. (2010).

DOI: 10.1002/9783433609194.ch2

Google Scholar

[2] E. Vintzeleou and T. P. Tassios, Seismic behaviour and design of infilled RC frames, Int. J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Seismol., vol. 3, no. 2, p.22–28, (1989).

Google Scholar

[3] P. Thomas and M. J. Priestley, Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York Wiley-Interscience, America, (1992).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Dehghani, G. Fischer, and F. Nateghi Alahi, Strengthening masonry infill panels using engineered cementitious composites, Mater. Struct., vol. 48, no. 1–2, p.185–204, Jan. (2015).

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0176-4

Google Scholar

[5] C. V. R. Murty and S. K. Jain, Beneficial influence of masonry infill walls on seismic performance of RC frame buildings, in 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Auckland, New Zealand, January 30), (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Valente, D. Gonçalves, C. Frazão, and J. A. Barros, Argamassa de ultra-elevada ductilidade para reabilitação: comportamento mecânico e durabilidade, in 5as Jornadas Portuguesas de Engenharia de Estruturas, JPEE 2014, Lisboa, Portugal, (2014).

Google Scholar

[7] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, vol. EN 1994–1–1. (2010).

DOI: 10.1680/dgte4.31517

Google Scholar