Experimental-Numerical Assessment of Critical SIF from VHCF Tests

Abstract:

The continuous enhancement of reliability and durability requirements for many machinery components is significantly pushing the experimental research on the Very-High-Cycle Fatigue (VHCF) response of metallic materials. In order to significantly reduce testing time, ultrasonic testing machines are widely adopted when carrying out VHCF tests. Several fundamental material properties can be estimated from the fracture surfaces of specimens failed during ultrasonic VHCF tests. In the VHCF literature the critical Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) is generally estimated by applying analytical SIF formulations to the typical semi-circular surface crack geometry revealed by fracture surfaces at final failure. However, when subjected to ultrasonic VHCF tests, analytical SIF formulations valid for static loading conditions could eventually lead to significant estimation errors. The present paper aims at comparing the critical SIF at failure estimated from conventional analytical formulations and from Finite Element Models (FEMs). The fracture surfaces of two specimens with different shapes (Hourglass and Gaussian) are taken into account for modeling crack geometry at final failure. Through an implicit solving procedure, the critical SIF in resonance condition at 20 kHz is computed from the 3D geometry of the cracked specimens and compared with the corresponding analytical prediction.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 713)
• Pages: 62-65
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.713.62
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: S.H. Hasani Najafabadi*, D.S. Paolino, A. Tridello, G. Chiandussi, Massimo Rossetto
• Keywords: Critical SIF, Gaussian Specimen, Gigacycle Fatigue, Size Effect, Ultrasonic Test, VHCF

References

[1] W. Tieying, C. Bathias: Engng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 47, (1994), p.683.

[2] W. Hoffelner, P. Gudmundson: Engng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 16, (1982), p.365.

[3] A.F. Blom, R. Glemberg: Comp. & Struct., Vol. 23, (1986), p.795.

[4] H.R. Mayer, S.E. Stanzl-Tschegg: D.M. Tan, Engng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 45, (1993), p.487.

[5] J. Ni, X. Zhang: Engng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 52, (1995), p.1079.

[6] C. F. Shih, R. J. Asaro: J. Appl. Mech., Vol 55, (1988), p.299.

[7] A. Tridello, D.S. Paolino, G. Chiandussi, M. Rossetto: Key Engng. Mater. Vol. 665, (2016), p.49.

[8] A. Tridello, D.S. Paolino, G. Chiandussi, M. Rossetto: Proc. Engng., Vol. 109, (2015), p.121.

[9] D.S. Paolino, A. Tridello, G. Chiandussi, M. Rossetto: Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. Vol. 37, (2014), p.570.

DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12149

[10] D.S. Paolino, A. Tridello, G. Chiandussi, M. Rossetto: Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. (in press), doi: 10. 1111/ffe. 12431.

[11] R.S. Barsoum: Int. J. Fract., Vol. 11 (1975), p.167.

[12] R. G. Forman, V. Shivakumar: ASTM STP905, (1986), p.59.

[13] A. Carpinteri: Engng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 42, (1992), p.1035.

[14] Y.S. Shih, J.J. Chen: Nuclear Engng. Design, Vol. 214, (2002), p.137.