Analytical-Numerical Determination of Stress Distribution around a Tip of Polygon-Like Inclusion

Ondřej Krepl; Jan Klusák; Tomáš Profant

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.713.94

Paper Titles

Old Suspended Timber Floors Flexurally-Strengthened with Different Structural Materials
p.78

Evaluation of Fatigue Strength of Different Thickness Laser Welded S355 Steel Sheets Considering Microstructure, Surface Conditions and Residual Stresses
p.82

Comparative Study of Microstructure and High Temperature Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Nickel Base Superalloys Inconel 713LC and MAR-M247
p.86

Mixed Mode Failure Criterion for Random Composites Using a Finite Element Model
p.90

Analytical-Numerical Determination of Stress Distribution around a Tip of Polygon-Like Inclusion
p.94

Microdamage, Viscoelasticity and Viscoplasticity as Main Phenomena in Thermal Stress Relaxation in Laminated Composites
p.99

Anisotropic Fatigue & Fracture Behaviour in Hot-Rolled and Cold-Drawn Pearlitic Steel Wires
p.103

Evaluation of Piezodiagnostics Approach for Leaks Detection in a Pipe Loop
p.107

Structural Safety Review of a Building Damaged by Explosion in Mexico City
p.111

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 713Analytical-Numerical Determination of Stress...

Analytical-Numerical Determination of Stress Distribution around a Tip of Polygon-Like Inclusion

Abstract:

A stress distribution in vicinity of a tip of polygon-like inclusion exhibits a singular stress behaviour. Singular stresses at the tip can be a reason for a crack initiation in composite materials. Knowledge of stress field is necessary condition for reliable assessment of such composites. A stress field near the general singular stress concentrator can be analytically described by means of Muskhelishvili plane elasticity based on complex variable functions. Parameters necessary for the description are the exponents of singularity and Generalized Stress Intensity Factors (GSIFs). The stress field in the closest vicinity of the SMI tip is thus characterized by 1 or 2 singular exponents (1 - λ) where, 0<Re (λ)<1, and corresponding GSIFs that follow from numerical solution. In order to describe stress filed further away from the SMI tip, the non-singular exponents for which 1<Re (λ), and factors corresponding to these non-singular exponents have to be taken into account. Analytical-numerical procedure of determination of stress distribution around a tip of sharp material inclusion is presented. Parameters entering to the procedure are varied and tuned. Thus recommendations are stated in order to gain reliable values of stresses and displacements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics XV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 713)

Pages:

94-98

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.713.94

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2016

Authors:

Ondřej Krepl*, Jan Klusák, Tomáš Profant

Keywords:

Non-Singular Stress Terms, Sharp Inclusion, Singular Stress Concentrator, Singular Stress Terms

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Muskhelishvili, N. I., Some basic problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity, trans. by I. R. M. Radok, Noordhoff, Groningen (1953).

DOI: 10.2307/3608633

Google Scholar

[2] England, A. H., Donver Pub., New York (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Pageau, S. S., Joseph, P. F., Biggers, S. B. Jr., Int.J. Sol. Struct., Vol. 31, 2979-2997 (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] Paggi, M., Carpinteri, A., Applied Mechanics Reviews 61 (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] Theocaris, P. S., International Journal of Engineering Science 12 (1974) 107-120.

Google Scholar

[6] Ayatollahi, M.R., Nejati, M., International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 53 (2011) 164–177.

Google Scholar

[7] Krepl O, Klusák J, Reconstruction of a 2D stress field around the tip of a sharp material inclusion, Procedia Structural Integrity 2(2016) 1920-27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.241

Google Scholar