The Comparison of Water, Water Vapour Transport Properties and Mechanical Characterization of Two Commercial Plasters on Market in the Czech Republic

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article deals with the comparison of two different renovation plasters produced by different companies in the Czech Republic. The selected stuccos were Feinputz 212 supplied by HASIT Šumavské vápenice a omítkárny s.r.o and Kbelosan F from Knauf Praha spol. s.r.o. They were studied in the means of basic physical properties, mechanical properties, water transport properties and water vapour transport properties. Results revealed only slight variations in bulk density, matrix density and open porosity, but in the means of transport properties, the plaster Feinputz 212 showed much higher openness to water and water vapour transport.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

357-361

Citation:

Online since:

December 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Kočí, J. Maděra, P. Rovnaníková, R. Černý, Hygrothermal performance of innovative renovation renders used for different types of historical masonry, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment. 118 (2011) 683-93.

DOI: 10.2495/str110571

Google Scholar

[2] V. Kočí, J. Maděra, R. Černý, Exterior thermal insulation systems for AAC building envelopes: Computational analysis aimed at increasing service life, Energy & Buildings. 47 (2012) 84-90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.030

Google Scholar

[3] M. Pavlíková, Z. Pavlík, M. Keppert, R. Černý, Salt transport and storage parameters of renovation plasters and their possible effects on restored buildings' walls, Construction and Building Materials. 25 (2011) 1205-1212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.034

Google Scholar

[4] S. Park, S. Kwon, S.H. Jung, Analysis technique for chloride penetration in cracked concrete using equivalent diffusion and permeation, Construction and Building Materials. 29 (2012) 183-192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.09.019

Google Scholar

[5] ČSN EN 1015-3: Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table), Prague (2007).

DOI: 10.3403/01541440

Google Scholar

[6] E. Vejmelková, M. Pavlíková, Z. Keršner, P. Rovnaníková, M. Ondráček, M. Sedlmajer, R. Černý, High performance concrete containing lower slag amount: A complex view of mechanical and durability properties, Construction and Building Materials. 23 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.018

Google Scholar

[7] ČSN EN 1015: 11 - Determining the strength of hardened mortar bending and compressive, Prague (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] E. Vejmelková, M. Pavlíková, M. Jerman and R. Černý, Free water intake as means of material characterization, Building Physics 33 (2009) 29–44.

DOI: 10.1177/1744259109104069

Google Scholar

[9] ČSN 72 7031: Determination of water vapour diffusion coefficient of building materials by method without temperature gradient, Prague (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Roels, J. Carmeliet, H. Hens, O. Adan, H. Brocken, R. Černý, Interlaboratory comparison of hygric properties of porous building materials, Journal of thermal envelope and building science 27 (2004) 307–25.

DOI: 10.1177/1097196304042119

Google Scholar