FE Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks with Glass-FRP Composite Bars

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to resolve the steel corrosion problem in bridge decks, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) has been recommended as a substitute to the conventional steel reinforcement in bridge decks. However, the use of GFRP bars in bridge decks is still limited by several concerns, including the long-term durability of GFRP bars in the concrete under sustained loadings. Literature review showed that the tensile strength reduction of the GFRP bar should be governed by the sustained stress level in the GFRP bar. In this regard, a GFRP reinforced concrete deck was simulated in this paper, aiming to investigate the sustained stress levels in the GFRP bars through three dimensional finite element (FE) modeling. Per AASHTO LRFD specifications, one lane loaded and two lane loaded cases were examined to identify the maximum tensile strains in the internal GFRP bars subjected to dead loads and HL-93 design loadings. The FE results showed that the maximum tensile stresses in GFRP bars under service loads were less than 1% of the GFRP design strength, which implied that the GFRP bars could have excellent long-term performance in real concrete bridge decks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

776-781

Citation:

Online since:

December 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Bertolini, B. Elsener, P. Pedeferri, R. Polder, Corrosion of steel in concrete: prevention, diagnosis, repair, 1st Edition, WILEY-VCH, Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/3527603379

Google Scholar

[2] ACI 440. 1R-06, Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars, American Concrete Institute, Committee 440, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] G. H. Koch, M. P. H. Brongers, N. G. Thompson, Y. P. Virmani, J. H. Payer, Corrosion costs and prevention strategies in the United States, Report No. FHWA-RD-01-156, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA, (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] S. K. Lee, Current state of bridge deterioration in the US – Part I, NACE Int. 51(1) (2012) 62-67.

Google Scholar

[5] R. J. Keesler, R. G. Powers, Corrosion of epoxy coated rebars—keys segmental bridge—Monroe County, Report No. 88-8A, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Materials Office, Corrosion Research Laboratories, Gainesville, Florida, (1988).

Google Scholar

[6] fib Bulletin No. 40, FRP reinforcement in RC structures, The International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Lausanne, Switzerland, (2007).

DOI: 10.35789/fib.bull.0040.ch01

Google Scholar

[7] AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete bridge decks and traffic railings, 1st Edition, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] CSA-S806-02, Design and construction of building components with fiber-reinforced polymers, Canadian Standards Association International, Ont., Canada, (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] CSA-S6, Canadian highway bridge design code, Canadian Standards Association International, Toronto, Ont., Canada, (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Mukherjee, S. J. Arwikar, Performance of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in tropical environments - Part I: structural scale tests, ACI Struct. J. 102(5) (2005) 745-753.

DOI: 10.14359/14670

Google Scholar

[11] T. H. Almusallam, Y. A. Al-Salloum, Durability of GFRP rebars in concrete beams under sustained loads at severe environments, J. Compos. Constr. ASCE 40(7) (2006) 623-637.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998305055275

Google Scholar

[12] J. Huang, R. Aboutaha, Environmental reduction factors for GFRP bars used as concrete reinforcement: new scientific approach, J. Compos. Constr. ASCE, 14(5) (2010) 479-486.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000122

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Chen, J. F. Davalos, I. Ray, H. Y. Kim, Accelerated aging tests for evaluations of durability performance of FRP reinforcing bars for concrete structures, Compos. Struct. 78(1) (2007) 101-111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.015

Google Scholar

[14] J. Huang, GFRP Bar reinforced concrete bridge deck: assessment of the AASHTO design guide specifications, proceedings of 2014 PCI Annual Convention an Exhibition and National Bridge Conference, Sept. 6-9, 2014. Washington, DC, USA (CD-ROM).

Google Scholar

[15] Abaqus/CAE user's manual, Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA, (2011).

Google Scholar

[16] B. Benmokrane, E. El-Salakawy, A. El-Ragaby and T. Lackey, Designing and testing of concrete bridge decks reinforced with glass FRP bars, J. Bridge Eng. ASCE, 11(2) (2006) 217-229.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2006)11:2(217)

Google Scholar

[17] AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 7th Edition, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA, (2014).

Google Scholar

[18] J. Huang, Sustained load effect on GFRP bar reinforced concrete deck, Appl. Mech. Mater. 99-100 (2011) 1251-1254.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.99-100.1251

Google Scholar

[19] PCI bridge design manual, 3rd Edition, the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, USA, (2011).

DOI: 10.15554/mnl-133-14

Google Scholar