Effects of the Processing on Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Structural Steel HG785D

Article Preview

Abstract:

The steel ingots of high-strength structural steel HG785D were produced by using a special water-cooled copper ingot mold. It analyzed the reason of the slab to achieve rapid solidification and shrinkage reducing with the simulation by using AnyCasting software. The difference properties between 100mm and 240mm steel plate with the same components were studied. The results show that properties are better with the increasing of the compression ratio, the times of TMCP and the reduction. The properties of 240mm steel plate with different composition were studied under the same heat treatment condition. Niobium, vanadium and titanium are in favor of the mechanical properties, but have little effect on the plasticity of structural steel. It should increase the harden ability of the alloy elements to improve mechanical properties of the steel HG785D.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

76-81

Citation:

Online since:

January 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T Andreas and S Falko. Steel Construction, 2013, Vol. (6) No. 3, p.186.

Google Scholar

[2] C Yang, H Zhang and J Zhong. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2013, Vol. (70) No. 1-4, p.421.

Google Scholar

[3] L Yinan, L Xuesong and Y Jiuchun. Materials & Design, 2012, No. 35, p.303.

Google Scholar

[4] X H Zhang, G C Su and C W Ju. Materials & Design, 2010, Vol. (9) No. 31, p.4408.

Google Scholar

[5] K Araki, S Deshimaru and H Kondou. Jhpi, 2003, Vol. (41) No. 4, p.168.

Google Scholar

[6] I A Abbas and N Abd-Alla A-E-N. Int J Thermophys, 2011, Vol. (32) No. 5, p.1098.

Google Scholar

[7] A Abdel-Halim. Int J Thermophys, 2010, Vol. (31) No. 11-12, p.2323.

Google Scholar

[8] Y Okayama, H Yasui and K Hara. Nippon Steel Tech. Rep, 2014, No. 90, p.59.

Google Scholar

[9] J J Schubbe. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2010, Vol. (20) No. 1, p.147.

Google Scholar

[10] X D Peng, L Hu and P X Wang. Adv Mater, 2011, No. 189-193, p.4033.

Google Scholar

[11] F Berto and C Marangon. Fatigue Fract Eng M, 2013, Vol. (11) No. 36, p.1139.

Google Scholar

[12] M R Hajmohammadi, M R Salimpour and M Saber. Energ Convers Manage, 2013, No. 76, p.691.

Google Scholar

[13] K Kalousov, O Souček and O Čadek. Geophys J Int, 2012, Vol. (190) No. 2, p.726.

Google Scholar

[14] Y-R Kim and J-W Kim. Int J Precis Eng Man, 2013, Vol. (14) No. 2: 247-252.

Google Scholar

[15] C M C Roque, J D Rodrigues and A J M Ferreira. Meccanica, 2011, Vol. (47) No. 5, p.1157.

Google Scholar

[16] C T Canaday, M A Moore and W Tang. Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2013, No. 559, p.678.

Google Scholar

[17] Y Deng, W Zhang and Z Cao. Materials & Design, 2013, No. 44, p.228.

Google Scholar

[18] A Kotousov. Int J Solids Struct, 2010, Vol. (47) No. 14-15, p. (1916).

Google Scholar

[19] V Schwinn, J Bauer and P Fl. Rev Roum Chim, 2011, Vol. (108) No. 5: 283.

Google Scholar

[20] I Senjanović, N Vladimir and M Tomić. J Sound Vib, 2013, Vol. (332), p.1868.

Google Scholar

[21] D Taler and J Taler. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 2009, Vol. (52) No. 9-10, p.2335.

Google Scholar

[22] M R Billat and X Boutillon. J Sound Vib, 2011, Vol. (330) No. 25, p.6098.

Google Scholar