Transverse Compaction Analysis of 2.5D Preform Composite

Article Preview

Abstract:

Transverse compaction is an important pattern of deformation during the composite resin transfer molding (RTM) process. Reasonable compaction rate is related to both the composite mould design and the fiber volume fraction of the final composite. In this paper, a mesoscopic geometry model based on CT scanning of 2.5D preform reinforcements is presented. Applying this model to the FEM simulation of transverse compaction, we prove the validation on simulating transverse compaction property of 2.5D preform by comparing to results of compaction test. Orientation angle during the progressive compaction is studied. Using this geometry structure, we build internal and surface RUC respectively then combining together to predict the in-plane mechanical property of 2.5D preform composite. Prediction result is acceptable corresponding to the mechanical properties calculated by homogenized method and compressive stiffness tested by combined loading compression (CLC) experiment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

51-57

Citation:

Online since:

February 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yi H L, Ding X. On the representation of multi-layer woven structure[J]. Journal of Donghua University, 1999 (3): 14-16.

Google Scholar

[2] Rudd C D, Long A C, Kendall K N, et al. Liquid moulding technologies. Woodhead, Cambridge, 1997, 231.

Google Scholar

[3] Potluri P, Sagar T V. Compaction modelling of textile preforms for composite structures[J]. Composite Structures, 2008, 86(1): 177-185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.019

Google Scholar

[4] Nguyen Q T, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P, et al. Mesoscopic scale analyses of textile composite reinforcement compaction[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 44(1): 231-241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.028

Google Scholar

[5] Batch G L, Cumiskey S, Macosko C W. Compaction of fiber reinforcements[J]. Polymer composites, 2002, 23(3): 307-318.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10433

Google Scholar

[6] Xie Y, Li S, Chen L. Experimental research on compression characteristics of 2. 5D woven fabric [J]. Journal of Tianjin Polytechnic University, 2010, 3: 19-23.

Google Scholar

[7] Lu Z, Zhou Y, Yang Z, et al. Multi-scale finite element analysis of 2. 5D woven fabric composites under on-axis and off-axis tension[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2013, 79: 485-494.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.003

Google Scholar

[8] Green S D, Long A C, El Said B S F, et al. Numerical modelling of 3D woven preform deformations[J]. Composite Structures, 2014, 108: 747-756.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.015

Google Scholar

[9] Zhou C, Yu J, Zhou G. Micro beam model for 3D woven composite materials[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2004, 6: 155-160.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhou G, Wang X, et al. Mechanical model and experimental verifications of 3D woven composites [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2004, 4: 007.

Google Scholar

[11] Gorczyca-Cole J L, Sherwood J A, Chen J. A friction model for thermostamping commingled glass–polypropylene woven fabrics[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2007, 38(2): 393-406.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.006

Google Scholar

[12] Xia Z, Zhang Y, Ellyin F. A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2003, 40(8): 1907-(1921).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(03)00024-6

Google Scholar

[13] Tan P, Tong L, Steven G P. Modeling approaches for 3D orthogonal woven composites[J]. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 1998, 17(6): 545-577.

DOI: 10.1177/073168449801700605

Google Scholar