Elastic Fracture Toughness for Ductile Metal Pipes with Circumferential Surface Cracks

Abstract:

Surface cracks have long been recognized as a major cause for potential failures of metal pipes. In fracture analysis, the widely used method is based on linear elastic fracture mechanics. However, for ductile metal pipes, it has been known that the existence of plasticity results in easing of stress concentration at the crack front. This will ultimately increase the total fracture toughness. Therefore, when using linear elastic fracture mechanics to predict fracture failure of ductile metal pipes, the plastic portion of fracture toughness should be excluded. Otherwise, the value of fracture toughness will be overestimated, resulting in an under-estimated probability of failure. This paper intends to derive a model of elastic fracture toughness for steel pipes with a circumferential crack. The derived elastic fracture toughness is a function of crack geometry and material properties of the cracked pipe. The significance of the derived model is that the well-established linear elastic fracture mechanics can be used for ductile materials in predicting the fracture failure.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 730)
• Pages: 489-495
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.730.489
• Online since: February 2017
• Authors: Chun Qing Li*, Guo Yang Fu, Shang Tong Yang
• Keywords: Circumferential Crack, Ductile Metal Pipes, Elastic Fracture Toughness, Plasticity, Stress Intensity Factor

References

[1] T. L. Anderson, Fracture mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, (1991).

[2] S. T. Yang, C. Q. Li, W. Yang, Analytical model of elastic fracture toughness for steel pipes with internal cracks, Eng. Fract. Mech. 153 (2016) 50-60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.11.014

[3] I. Milne, R. A. Ainsworth, A. R. Dowling, A. T. Stewart, Background to and Validation of CEGB Report R/H/R6—Revision 3, Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip 32(1-4) (1988) 105-196.

DOI: 10.1016/0308-0161(88)90072-5

[4] SINTAP, Structural Integrity Assessment Procedures for European Industry—Final Procedure, European Union Project No. BE95-1426, (1999).

[5] I. S. Raju, J. C. Newman, Stress intensity factors for circumferential surface cracks in pipes and rods, Fracture Mechanics: Seventeenth Volume, ASTM STP (Third Edn), 905 (1986) 789-805.

DOI: 10.1520/stp17428s

[6] C. Q. Li, G. Y. Fu, W. Yang, Stress intensity factors for inclined external surface cracks in pressurized pipes, submitted to Engineering Fracture Mechanics (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.08.014

[7] Y. J. Kim, D. J. Shim, N. S. Huh, Y. J. Kim, Finite element based plastic limit loads for cylinders with part-through surface cracks under combined loading, Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip 80(7-8) (2003) 527-540.

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(03)00106-6

[8] A. G. Miller, Review of test results for ductile failure pressure of cracked spherical and cylindrical pressure vessels, UK: CEGB; (1984).

[9] M. Staat, D. K. Vu, Limit analysis of flaws in pressurized pipes and cylindrical vessels, Part II: Circumferential defects, Eng Fract Mech, 97 (2013) 314-333.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.05.017

[10] H. D. Schulze, G. Togler, E. Bodmann, Fracture mechanics analysis on the initiation and propagation of circumferential and longitudinal cracks in straight pipes and pipe bends, Nucl. Eng. Des. 58(1) (1980) 19-31.

DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(80)90090-4

[11] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, section 11, In service inspection of nuclear power plant components, 1974, Article A. 3000, p.117.

[12] K. R. Brown, B. Zybenko, The fracture mechanics of alluminum alloy gas cylinders, Eng. Fract. Mech. 15(1-2) (1981) 1-20.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(81)90101-6