The Effect of Drilling Waste on Water Resources - The Elemental Composition of Waste

Aleksandra  Sergeevna Mishunina; Alena Andreevna Mekh; Egor Grigorevich Yazikov

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.743.338

Paper Titles

The Electrochemical Method of Oil-Contaminated Soil Remediation
p.314

Phytotesting as a Method of Determining the Degree of Eutrophication of Water Objects
p.319

Effects of AC Frequency on the Physicochemical Characteristics of Water
p.326

Recycling Red Mud of JSC Ural Aluminum Plant with the Recovery of Iron and Construction Materials
p.331

The Effect of Drilling Waste on Water Resources - The Elemental Composition of Waste
p.338

Electrochemical Recycling of Still Waste Liquid in Ammonia Soda Production
p.342

Study of Antigenic Activity of Experimental Samples of the Conjugated Vaccines Based on Synthetic Oligosaccharide Ligands and CRM197 Carrier Protein against Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
p.349

Ionic Liquids as Catalysts for the Acetylation of Camphene
p.355

Optimization of the Blast Furnace Operating Modes for Identification of the Areas of Unimprovable Solutions
p.363

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 743The Effect of Drilling Waste on Water Resources -...

The Effect of Drilling Waste on Water Resources - The Elemental Composition of Waste

Abstract:

In order to maintain the volume of oil and gas supplies, the number of oil and gas wells increases every year, drilling platforms are built, which proportionally increases the amount of sludge and drilling waste mud, which must be recycled. The research gives light to the danger of introducing chemical substances into various natural environments from industrial and anthropogenic sources on an example of drill cuttings from oil fields of Tomsk region.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

High Technology: Research and Applications 2016

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 743)

Pages:

338-341

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.743.338

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2017

Authors:

Aleksandra Sergeevna Mishunina*, Alena Andreevna Mekh, Egor Grigorevich Yazikov

Keywords:

Chemicals, Drilling Muds (DM), Drilling Waste (DW), Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC), Water

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Information on http: /green. tsu. ru – 25. 10. 16.

Google Scholar

[2] Ouyang, W. Comparison of bio augmentation and composting for remediation of oily sludge: fiekd-scale study in China. Process Biochem 40 (2005) 3763-3768.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.06.004

Google Scholar

[3] Halla, S. Update on Directive 050: Drilling Waste Management– (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Dorn, P.B., Salanirtro, J.P. Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation. 40 (2000) 419-426.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00304-5

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. surgutneftegas. ru/ecology/reports.

Google Scholar

[6] Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation on December 4, 2014 N 536.

Google Scholar

[7] Ivlev, S.I., Sobolev, V.I. Atomic emission analysis: Methodical instructions to performance of laboratory works for the course Physical and chemical methods of analysis" for students of the IV year, enrolled in the direction 240501 "Chemical technology of modern energy materials, Publishing house of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, (2014).

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http: /window. edu. ru/catalog/pdf2txt/091/29091/12304?p_page=1.

Google Scholar

[9] Gorham, E. Northern peatlands: role in carbon cycle and probable responses to climate warming. Ecol. Appl. 1 (1991) 182–195.

DOI: 10.2307/1941811

Google Scholar

[10] Mattheus, E., Fung, I. Methane emission from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 1 (1987) 61-86.

DOI: 10.1029/gb001i001p00061

Google Scholar