Structural Health Monitoring of a Historical Masonry Bell Tower Using Operational Modal Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper addresses the modal and structural identification of the historical masonry bell tower of Ficarolo, in Italy. After the seismic sequence of May 2012, the tower reported a serious damage pattern. Retrofitting interventions were designed and they mainly consisted in the rebuilding of cracked zones and the strengthening of masonry walls with carbon bars embedded in the masonry with epoxy resin. Afterwards, a continuous dynamic monitoring system has been installed on the tower. From the recorded structural response under ambient excitation, the dynamic characteristics of the tower are identified using Operational Modal Analysis techniques. Results of the first months of continuous monitoring are presented in this paper. Moreover, in order to analyse the evolution of the structural behaviour, the effect of changing temperature on the identified natural frequencies is investigated. The experimental modal parameters are also used to identify the elastic modulus of the reinforced masonry through the calibration of a Finite Element (FE) model of the tower. In addition, the influence of the soil-foundation system on the structural behaviour is evaluated. The calibration procedure is performed adopting an improved surrogate-assisted evolutionary strategy. The calibrated FE model can be adopted to simulate the structural response to far-field earthquakes. Moreover, the monitoring system can give valuable information on the structural behaviour and the structural health in the case of seismic events.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

440-447

Citation:

Online since:

July 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Castellazzi, A. M. D'Altri, S. de Miranda, and F. Ubertini, An innovative numerical modeling strategy for the structural analysis of historical monumental buildings, Engineering Structures, vol. 132, pp.229-248, (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.032

Google Scholar

[2] S. Cattari, S. Degli Abbati, D. Ferretti, S. Lagomarsino, D. Ottonelli, and A. Tralli, Damage assessment of fortresses after the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy), Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, pp.2333-2365, (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9520-x

Google Scholar

[3] M. Savoia, N. Buratti, and L. Vincenzi, Damage and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquake, Engineering Structures, vol. 137, pp.162-180, (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.059

Google Scholar

[4] L. Ramos, L. Marques, P. Lourenço, G. D. Roeck, A. Campos-Costa, and J. Roque, Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 24, no. 5, pp.1291-1305, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.011

Google Scholar

[5] A. Saisi, C. Gentile, and M. Guidobaldi, Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 81, pp.101-112, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.010

Google Scholar

[6] R. Ceravolo, G. Pistone, L. Z. Fragonara, S. Massetto, and G. Abbiati, Vibration-based monitoring and diagnosis of cultural heritage: A methodological discussion in three examples, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 10, no. 4, pp.375-395, (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2013.850554

Google Scholar

[7] E. Bassoli, L. Vincenzi, M. Bovo, and C. Mazzotti, Dynamic identification of an ancient masonry bell tower using a MEMS-based acquisition system, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems, Trento, Italy, (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/eesms.2015.7175882

Google Scholar

[8] D. Zonta, B. Glisic, and S. Adriaenssens, Value of information: impact of monitoring on decision-making, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 21, no. 7, pp.1043-1056, (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/stc.1631

Google Scholar

[9] C. Papadimitriou, Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 278, no. 4-5, pp.923-947, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.063

Google Scholar

[10] L. Vincenzi and L. Simonini, Influence of model errors in optimal sensor placement, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 389, pp.119-133, (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.033

Google Scholar

[11] R. Brincker, L. Zhang, and P. Andersen, Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition, Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 10, no. 3, p.441, (2001).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303

Google Scholar

[12] C. Rainieri and G. Fabbrocino, Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 24, no. 3, pp.678-695, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.003

Google Scholar

[13] L. Vincenzi and P. Gambarelli, A proper infill sampling strategy for improving the speed performance of a Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm, Computers and Structures, vol. 178, pp.58-70, (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.10.004

Google Scholar

[14] L. Vincenzi and M. Savoia, Coupling response surface and differential evolution for parameter identification problems, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp.376-393, (2015).

DOI: 10.1111/mice.12124

Google Scholar