Morphology and Properties of Polyoxymethylene/Polypropylene/Microcrystalline Cellulose Composites

Abstract:

The effects of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) on mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of polyoxymethylene (POM)/polypropylene (PP) blends at different compositions were investigated. The blends and composites were prepared by melt mixing using an internal mixer at 200°C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed phase separation between POM and PP phases due to the difference in polarity of POM and PP. When adding the MCC in the blends the morphology slightly changed due to the weak interaction between MCC and polymer phases. Incorporation of MCC at 5 phr could improve Young’s modulus of POM/PP blends. The storage modulus of the blends was improved after adding MCC 5 phr due to reinforcing effect of the MCC. The thermal properties found that the addition of MCC had no effect on the melting temperature of the blends. The blends exhibited higher decomposition temperature than pure POM. The blends showed the decomposition temperatures increased when increasing amount of PP content, which were higher than pure POM. Therefore, it may be inferred that the addition of PP could enhance the thermal stability of the POM/PP blends, but the addition of MCC did not improve the thermal stability.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 751)
• Pages: 264-269
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.751.264
• Online since: August 2017
• Authors: Nipawan Yasumlee, Sirirat Wacharawichanant*
• Keywords: Microcrystalline Cellulose, Polymer Composites, Polyoxymethylene, Polypropylene

References

[1] C.A. Harper, Handbook of Plastics Technologies: The Complete Guide to Properties and Performance, McGraw-Hill, New York, (2006).

[2] P. Svoboda, D. Svobodova, P. Slobodian, T. Ougizawa, T. Inoue, Transmission electron microscopy study of phase morphology in polypropylene/ethylene-octene copolymer blends, Eur. Polym. J. 45 (2009) 1485-1492.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.01.032

[3] M. Abdelmouleh, S. Boufi, M.N. Belgacem, A.P. Duarte, A. Ben Salah, A. Gandini, Modification of cellulosic fibres with functionalized silanes: development of surface properties, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 24 (2004) 43-54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(03)00099-x

[4] M. Abdelmouleh, S. Boufi, M.N. Belgacem, A. Dufresne, Short natural-fibre reinforced polyethylene and natural rubber composites: Effect of silane coupling agents and fibres loading, Compos. Sci. Technol. 67 (2007) 1627-1639.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.003

[5] M.N. Belgacem, A. Gandini, The surface modification of cellulose fibres for use as reinforcing elements in composite materials, Composite Interfaces 12 (2005) 41-75.

DOI: 10.1163/1568554053542188

[6] X. Ma, P.R. Chang, J. Yu, Properties of biodegradable thermoplastic pea starch/carboxymethyl cellulose and pea starch/microcrystalline cellulose composites, Carbohydr. Polym. 72 (2008) 369-375.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.002

[7] A. Kiziltas, D.J. Gardner, Y. Han, H. -S. Yang, Dynamic mechanical behavior and thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose-filled nylon 6 composites, Thermochim. Acta 519 (2011) 38-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2011.02.026

[8] S. Wacharawichanant, P. Amorncharoen, R. Wannasirichoke, Effects of compatibilizers on morphology and properties of polyoxymethylene/polypropylene blends, Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 54 (2015) 1349-1357.

DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2014.996903

[9] R. Bouza, S. -G. Pardo, L. Barral, M.J. Abad, Design of new polypropylene-woodflour composites: Processing and physical characterization, Polym. Compos. 30 (2009) 880-886.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.20624

[10] M.K. Mohamad Haafiz, A. Hassan, Z. Zakaria, I.M. Inuwa, M.S. Islam, M. Jawaid, Properties of polylactic acid composites reinforced with oil palm biomass microcrystalline cellulose, Carbohydr. Polym. 98 (2013) 139-145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.069

[11] L. Petersson, K. Oksman, Biopolymer based nanocomposites: Comparing layered silicates and microcrystalline cellulose as nanoreinforcement, Compos. Sci. Technol. 66 (2006) 2187-2196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.010

[12] X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Reinforcement effect of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS)-graftedcellulose nanocrystal on toughened PBS/polylactic acid blends, Carbohydr. Polym. 140 (2016) 374-382.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.073

[13] T. Mukherjee, M. Sani, N. Kao, R.K. Gupta, N. Quazi, S. Bhattacharya, Improved dispersion of cellulose microcrystals in polylactic acid (PLA) based composites applying surface acetylation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 101 (2013) 655-662.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.07.032

[14] A.K. Bledzki, A.A. Mamun, M. Feldmann, Polyoxymethylene composites with natural and cellulose fibres: Toughness and heat deflection temperature, Compos. Sci. Technol. 72 (2012) 1870-1874.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.004

[15] L. Suryanegara, A.N. Nakagaito, H. Yano, The effect of crystallization of PLA on the thermal and mechanical properties of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced PLA composites, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69 (2009) 1187-1192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.022

[16] N. Ploypetchara, P. Suppakul, D. Atong, C. Pechyen, Blend of polypropylene/poly(lactic acid) for medical packaging application: physicochemical, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties, Energy Procedia 56 (2014) 201-210.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.150