Design Development of a Four-Story Strongback Braced Frame

Article Preview

Abstract:

Conventional braced frames tend to concentrate damage in one or a few stories during large earthquakes, indicative of “weak” or “soft” story behavior. To mitigate this behavior, several studies have proposed a modified braced frame, or “strongback”, that utilizes an essentially elastic vertical steel truss to impose a uniform drift distribution. While a subassemblage experimental test and past numerical studies have shown that the strongback system can successfully delay or prevent weak or soft story behavior, the dynamic behavior of this system has not been systematically assessed or evaluated. This study defines the design space for a four-story strongback system. The ability of the strongback to mitigate weak story behavior under a far-field suite of ground motions was assessed using the performance-based methodology in FEMA P695.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1050-1057

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Khatib, Seismic behavior of concentrically braced frames, Rept. No. UCB/EERC-88/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, (1988).

Google Scholar

[2] D. A. Foutch, S. C. Goel and C. W. Roeder, Seismic Testing of Full-Scale Steel Building - Part I, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 113, no. 11, pp.2111-2129, (1987).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1987)113:11(2111)

Google Scholar

[3] J. Lai and S. Mahin, Strongback system: a way to reduce damage concentration in steel braced frames, ASCE, J. Struct. Eng., (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001198

Google Scholar

[4] P. Uriz and S. Mahin, Toward earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel frame structures, Rept. No. PEER-2008/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Rai and S. Goel, Seismic evaluation and upgrade of chevron braced frames, J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 59, no. 8, pp.971-994, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(03)00006-3

Google Scholar

[6] R. Tremblay, Achieving a stable inelastic seismic response for multi-story concentrically braced frames, AISC J. Struct. Eng., vol. 40, no. 2, pp.111-129, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] C. H. Chen and S. Mahin, Performance-based seismic design of concentrically braced steel frame buildings, Rept. No. PEER 2012/103, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] X. Ji, M. Kato, T. Wang, T. Hitaka and M. Nakashima, Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames, J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 65, no. 12, pp.2148-2156, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.003

Google Scholar

[9] G. MacRae, Y. Kimura and C. Roeder, Effect of Column Stiffness on Braced Frame Seismic Behavior, ASCE, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 130: 3, no. 381, pp.381-391, (2004).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:3(381)

Google Scholar

[10] A. Imanpour, R. Tremblay, A. Davaran, C. Stoakes and L. and Fahnestock, Seismic Performance Assessment of Multitiered Steel Concentrically Braced Frames Designed in Accordance with the 2010 AISC Seismic Provisions, AISC J. Struct. Eng., (2016).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001561

Google Scholar

[11] B. Simpson and S. Mahin, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Strongback Braced Frame System to Mitigate Weak Story Behavior, ASCE, J. Struct. Eng., in press.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001960

Google Scholar

[12] M. Pollino, S. Derek Slovenec, B. Qu and a. G. Mosqueda, Seismic Rehabilitation of Concentrically Braced Frames Using Stiff Rocking Cores, ASCE, J. Struct. Eng., (2017).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001810

Google Scholar

[13] S. Merzouq and R. Tremblay, Seismic design of dual concentrically braced steel frames for stable seismic performance for multi-story buildings, in 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] T. Takeuchi, X. Chen and R. Matsui, Seismic performance of controlled spine frames with energy-dissipating members, J. Const. Steel Research, vol. 114, pp.51-65, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.07.002

Google Scholar

[15] FEMA, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, FEMA P695, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, (2009).

Google Scholar

[16] D. Vamvatsikos and C. A. Cornell, Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp.491-514, (2002).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.141

Google Scholar

[17] F. McKenna, Object oriented finite element programming frameworks for analysis, algorithms, and parallel computing, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, (1997).

Google Scholar