Seismic Performance Assessment of Existing Steel Buildings: A Case Study

Abstract:

Numerous existing steel framed buildings located in earthquake prone regions world-wide were designed without seismic provisions. Slender beam-columns, as well as non-ductile beam-to-column connections have been employed for multi-storey moment-resisting frames (MRFs) built before the 80’s. Thus, widespread damage due to brittle failure has been commonly observed in the past earthquakes for steel MRFs. A recent post-earthquake survey carried out in the aftermath of the 2016-2017 Central Italy seismic swarm has pointed out that steel structures may survive the shaking caused by several main-shocks and strong aftershocks without collapsing. Inevitably, significant lateral deformations are experienced, and, in turn, non-structural components are severely damaged thus inhibiting the use of the steel building structures. The present papers illustrates the outcomes of a recent preliminary numerical study carried out for the case of a steel MRF building located in Amatrice, Central Italy, which experienced a series of ground motion excitations suffering significant damage to the masonry infills without collapsing. A refined numerical model of the sample structure has been developed on the basis of the data collected on site. Given the lack of design drawings, the structure has been re-designed in compliance with the Italian regulations imposed at the time of construction employing the allowable stress method. The earthquake performance of the case study MRF has been then investigated through advanced nonlinear dynamic analyses and its structural performance has been evaluated according to Eurocode 8-Part 3 for existing buildings. The reliability of the codified approaches has been evaluated and possible improvements emphasized.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 763)
• Pages: 1067-1076
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.1067
• Online since: February 2018
• Authors: Luigi di Sarno*, Fabrizio Paolacci, Anastasios G. Sextos
• Keywords: Building, Earthquake, Frames, Performance Criteria, Seismic Assessment

References

[1] A. Formisano, F. Gamardella, F. M. Mazzolani, F.M. Capacity and demand of ductility for shear connections in steel MRF structures, Civil-Comp Proceedings, 102, (2013).

DOI: 10.4203/ccp.102.13

[2] A.Y. Elghazouli, Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel frames structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8(1) (2010) 65-89.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6

[3] X. Romao, R. Delgado, J. Guedes, A. Costa, A comparative application of different EC8-3 procedures for the seismic safety assessment of existing structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8 (2010) 91-118.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9123-8

[4] A. Braconi, S. Caprili, H. Degee, M. Guendel, M. Hjaij, B. Hoffmeister, S. A. Karamanos, V. Rinaldi, W. Salvatore, Efficiency of Eurocode 8 design rules for steel and steel-concrete composite structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 112 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.021

[5] M. Araujo, J. M. Castro, A critical review of European and American Provisions for the Seismic Assessment of Existing Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings, Journal of Earthquake Engineering (2017) 1-29.

DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1277568

[6] European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, Brussels, Belgium, 2205.

[7] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-13, Reston, Virginia, USA, (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784414859.err

[8] A. S. Elnashai, L. Di Sarno, Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering: From the Source to Fragility, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, ISBN 976-0-470-02483-6, (2015).

[9] A. Formisano, R. Landolfo, F.M. Mazzolani, Robustness assessment approaches for steel framed structures under catastrophic events, Computers and Structures 147 (2015) 216-228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.010

[10] R. Landolfo, F. M. Mazzolani, R. Zandonini, Steel and Steel-Concrete Composite Structures. In The state of Earthquake Engineering Research in Italy: the ReLUIS-DPC 2010-2013 Project, G. Manfredi, M. Dolce (eds), 99-141, doi: 10. 14599/r101303, Doppiavoce, Napoli, Italy, (2015).

[11] F. Freddi, E. Tubaldi, A. Zona, Dall'Asta Seismic performance of structural systems equipped with buckling-restrained braces, XXVI Giornate Italiane della Costruzione in Acciaio, CTA Collegio dei Tecnici dell'Acciaio, Venice, Italy, 28-30 September, (2017).

[12] A. Nassirpour, B. Song, D. D'Ayala, IDA & Cloud Method for Fragility Assessment of Bare & Infilled Steel Frame Structures. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, 9-13 January, 2017a.

[13] A. Nassirpour, B. Song, D. D'Ayala, Seismic loss estimation of mid-rise masonry infilled steel frame structures through incremental dynamic analysis, International Journal of Forensic Engineering 3(3) (2017) 255.

DOI: 10.1504/ijfe.2017.082975

[14] GEER, Engineering Reconnaissance of the 24 August 2016 Central Italy Earthquake, Version 2, Report No. GEER-050B, Version 2 (11), doi: 10. 18118/G61S3Z, (2016).

[15] Gruppo di Lavoro INGV sul terremoto in centro Italia, Summary report on the October 30, 2016 earthquake in central Italy Mw 6. 5, doi: 10. 5281/zenodo. 166238, (2016).

[16] Ministero per le Infrastrutture e i Trasporti, Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Roma, Italy (in Italian), (2008).

[17] Ministero per i Lavori Pubblici, Decreto Ministeriale 16 Gennaio 1996 – Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni in Zone Sismiche, Roma, Italy (in Italian), (2008).

[18] Midas Engineering Software, Integrated Solution System for Building and General Structures, (2017).

[19] M. Menegotto, P. E. Pinto, Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. Proceedings of the IABSE Symposium of Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, International Assoc. of Bridge and Structural Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 13, 15-22, (1973).

[20] F. J. Crisafully, A. J. Carr, R. Park, Analytical modelling of infilled frame structures. A general overview, Bulletin of Te New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 33(1) (2000) 30-47.

DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.33.1.30-47

[21] A. S. Elnashai, L. Di Sarno, Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Wiley and Sons, UK, (2008).

[22] R.E. Klingner, V. V. Bertero, Infilled Frames in Earthquake-Resistant Construction, Report no. EERC 76-32, University of California, Berkeley, USA, (1976).

[23] G. Al-Chaar, Evaluating Strength and Stiffness of Unreinforced Masonry Infill Structures. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Report no. ERDC/CERL TR-02-01, USA, (2002).

DOI: 10.21236/ada407072

[24] M.N. Fardis, T. B. Panagiotakos, Seismic design and response of bare and infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Part II: Infilled structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1(3) (1997) 475-503.

DOI: 10.1080/13632469708962375

[25] Comite Europeen de Normalisation (CEN), Eurocode 8 — Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, Brussels, (2006).

[26] P. Fajfar, P. Gaspersic, P., The N2 Method for the Seismic Damage Analysis of RC Buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 25(1) (1996) 31-46.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::aid-eqe534>3.0.co;2-v