Cyclic Performance of a Lightweight Rapidly Constructible and Reconfigurable Modular Steel Floor Diaphragm

Article Preview

Abstract:

One approach to making modern structures more economically and environmentally sustainable is designing and constructing them to be adaptable to rapidly changing markets and building occupancies. At the same time, these structures are required to be resilient to seismic events. As a step towards meeting these goals, a lightweight, two-way, rapidly constructible and reconfigurable modular steel floor (RCRMSF) system has been developed. The system is fabricated from light-gauge steel plates sandwiching a grillage of orthogonally arranged cold formed Z-purlins, can span 9.1 m x 12.2 m, requires only girder supports, and fits within current steel construction framework. This study investigates the seismic behavior of the RCRMSF diaphragm through the use of high fidelity nonlinear finite element (FE) models. Six full-scale cantilever diaphragm models have been developed to study the effect of varying RCRMSF configurations and end support details. Both monotonic and cyclic loading protocols are used to determine the stiffness, strength, energy dissipation capacity, and general hysteretic behavior of the diaphragms. Based on the FE models, the behavior of the RCRMSF diaphragm is influenced primarily by the plate thickness and perimeter connection detail to the supporting steel frame. Overall, the RCRMSF has adequate diaphragm stiffness and strength, and shows favorable energy dissipation capacity due to its post-peak inelastic behavior. This observation implies that the RCRMSF can serve as an alternative solution to current seismic design and construction practices.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

541-548

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.P. Moehle, J.D. Hooper, D.J. Kelly, & T.R. Meyer, Seismic Design of cast-in-place concrete diaphragms, chords, and collectors. Seismic design technical brief, US Department of Commerce, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010).

DOI: 10.6028/nist.gcr.16-917-42

Google Scholar

[2] L. Luttrell, Designing Roof and Floor Diaphragms. Modern Steel Construction, Chicago, IL (1996).

Google Scholar

[3] SDI (Steel Deck Institute), Diaphragm Design Manual, 4th Edition. Steel Deck Institute (2015).

Google Scholar

[4] ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) Standard method for static load testing of framed floor or roof diaphragm constructions for buildings. ASTM E455, Annual Book of Standards, West Conshohocken, PA (2016).

DOI: 10.1520/e0455

Google Scholar

[5] J. Bagwell, Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation (Thesis). Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] P. O'Brien, S. Florig, C.D. Moen, M.R. Eatherton, Characterizing the Load Deformation Behavior of Steel Deck Diaphragms (2016).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Tremblay, C.A. Rogers, Impact of Capacity Design Provisions and Period Limitations on the Seismic Design of Low-Rise Steel Buildings. Steel Structures. 5(2005), 1-22.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044637-0/50202-x

Google Scholar

[8] A.H. Nilson, Analysis of light gauge steel shear diaphragms. International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures. Missouri, USA (1973).

Google Scholar

[9] CGC (2016). Tile and Flooring Solution. Data Sheet- CGC Durock Brand Cement Board.

Google Scholar

[10] E. Boadi-Danquah, B. Robertson, M. Fadden, Design and Parametric Finite Element Analysis—A Thin Lightweight Two-Way Steel Flooring System. Structures Congress (2017) 225-236.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784480410.020

Google Scholar

[11] B. Robertson, E. Boadi-Danquah, M. Fadden, E.J. Sutley, J. Colistra, Lightweight Rapidly Constructible and Reconfigurable Modular Steel Floor Systems: Serviceability Analysis and Design. AEI 201 (2017) 603-614.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784480502.050

Google Scholar

[12] DSS (Dassault Systemes Simulia). Abaqus FEA version 2016 (2015).

Google Scholar

[13] SSMA (Steel Studs Manufacturers Association). Product Technical Guide (2015).

Google Scholar

[14] C.D. Moen, Direct strength design of cold-formed steel members with perforations. The Johns Hopkins University (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] HILTI Steel Deck Fastening Systems, Direct Fastening Technical Guide (2015).

Google Scholar

[16] HILTI AG Schaan, Diaphragm Decking Test, Fastening Systems Research Laboratory (2007).

Google Scholar

[17] E. Boadi-Danquah, D. Maclachlan, M. Fadden, Lightweight Rapidly Constructible and Reconfigurable Modular Steel Floor Diaphragm: Cyclic Performance. 3rd Huixian International Forum on Earthquake Engineering for Young Researchers, Illinois-USA. (2017).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.763.541

Google Scholar

[18] L. Wang, M.D. Webster, J.F. Hajjar, Diaphragm Behavior of Deconstructable Composite Floor Systems. Proc. 8th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas. Shanghai, China (2015).

Google Scholar