Buckling-Restrained Braces (BRB) Seismic Design - A Consulting Engineer’s Consideration

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is no standard for the design of Buckling-Restrained Braces (BRBs) frames in New Zealand. Consequently, a consulting engineer would need to consider a range of overseas design standards and latest research findings and incorporate into a New Zealand code-compliance framework. This “Alternative Solution” pathway to satisfy the New Zealand Building Code means peer review and agreement with peer review is required. This paper describes the design journey and technical challenges the authors had in the seismic design of the BRB for the New Zealand International Convention Centre (NZICC). BRB frames are used as the primary ductile lateral load bracing system, acting in parallel with the moment-resisting frames formed by the primary cruciform columns and storey-deep trusses. Due to the vertical irregularity and a dual-system structure, a direct displacement-based design (DDBD) approach was used in parallel with a more convention code-compliant force-based design, to derive the BRB design actions. The design of the BRB connections, in particular the gusset design is particularly challenging due to the diverging views and numerous methodologies available. We have considered several analytical methods for the BRB connection design and commissioned two full-scale testing of the critical BRB and the gusset connection. Lessons learnt

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

932-940

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kam, W.Y., Built, R.J., Gardiner, R. J (2017). Seismic Design of the New Zealand International Convention Centre (NZICC). In the Proc of NZSEE 2017 Conference, Wellington New Zealand. Paper O4A. 2.

Google Scholar

[2] Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., Kowalsky, M.J. 2007. Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:6(1065)

Google Scholar

[3] Sullivan. T.J. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi G.M. Editors. 2012a. A model code for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, DBD12. IUSS Press, Pavia. ISBN 978-88-6198-072-3. p.105.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.807

Google Scholar

[4] Maley T.J., Sullivan T.J., Della Corte G. 2010. Development of a Displacement-Based Design Method for Steel Dual Systems with Buckling-Restrained Braces and Moment Resisting Frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 14(S1). 106-140.

DOI: 10.1080/13632461003651687

Google Scholar

[5] NZS1170. 5 (2014) NZS 1170. 5: 2004 Structural design actions incorporating Amendment 1 (2014). Standards New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.

Google Scholar

[6] NZS3404. (2004) NZS 1170. 5: 2004 Structural design actions. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.

Google Scholar

[7] AISC 341 2010 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-10), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.

DOI: 10.1201/b11248-16

Google Scholar

[8] Lopez W. A, Sabelli R. Seismic Design of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames. Structural Steel Educational Council Technical Information & Product Service (Document). July (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] Saxey B, Daniels M (2014) Characterization of overstrength factors for buckling restrained braces. In Proc of the 2014 Australasian Structural Engineering Conference (ASEC), Auckland, New Zealand.

Google Scholar

[10] Richards P.W., Saxey B.W. (2017) Quantifying length-effects on buckling-restrained braces that are considerably longer than associated qualification tests. In Proc of 2017 NZSEE Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

Google Scholar

[11] AISC Design Guide 29, Vertical Bracing Connections-Analysis and Design. 2015 1st Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.

Google Scholar

[12] Palmer, K.D., Roeder, C.W., Lehman, D.E., Okazaki, T., Shield, C. Experimental Performance of Steel Braced Frames Subjected to Bidirectional Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 8, August (2013).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000624

Google Scholar

[13] Wigle, V. R., and Fahnestock, L. A. (2010). Buckling-restrained braced frame connection performance., J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(1), 65–74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.014

Google Scholar

[14] Macrae G.A., Clifton G.C. (2015) Research on seismic performance of steel structures. In Proc of Steel Innovations 2015 Conference. Auckland, New Zealand. 3-4 Sept (2015).

Google Scholar

[15] Sitler, B., Macrae, G., Takeuchi, T., Matsui, R., Westeneng, B., Jones A. (2017): Buckling restrained brace connection and stability performance issues. Proc of 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile.

Google Scholar

[16] Westeneng B, Lee CL, MacRae G (2016): Prevention of gusset plate out-of-plane sway buckling failure in buckling restrained braced frames. Proc of 2016 NZSEE Conference, Christchurch.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.763.892

Google Scholar

[17] Westeneng B, Lee CL, MacRae G, Jones A. (2017): Out-of-plane buckling behaviour of BRB gusset plate connections. Proc of 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile.

Google Scholar