Investigation of Flammability, Thermal and Toxic Hazards of Liquid Materials in Vehicles

Article Preview

Abstract:

In case of vehicle fires, oil leakage fires along with the emissions of heat and smoke represent significant fire risk for the combustion of whole vehicles and ambient environment. In present study, the bench-scale cone calorimeter apparatus was employed to conduct fire hazards analysis. Three typical flammable oils, namely OAT, ATF and GLF were used as experimental materials. The heating radiation levels were set from 15 kW/m2 to 40 kW/m2 in steps of 5 kW/m2. Specific parameters, such as ignition time (TII), heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR) and CO concentration, have been studied to provide a comprehensive fire behavior assessment of the oils. The ignition times have a liner relationship with external heat fluxes. And the critical heat fluxes (CHF) of ATF and GLF are 6.0 kW/m2 and 3.8 kW/m2, respectively. The derived HRP, FPI and FGI values of ATF remarkably indicate that this oil can contribute more thermal hazard while OAT has the lowest. However, FED values reveal highest toxic hazards of GLF. OAT is the safest materials in terms of three typical oils.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

292-298

Citation:

Online since:

July 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Tewarson, J. Quintiere, D. Purser, Comprehensive Analyses of Post Collision Motor Vehicle Fires, Norwood, MA, Charlottesville, VA, FM Global (2005) 3018009.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Santrock, D. W. Kononen, Flammability Properties of Engine Compartment Fluids Other than Gasoline: Auto-Ignition Characteristics of Non-Gasoline Motor Vehicle Fluids on Heated Surfaces. GM Report (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Tewarson, Thermophysical and fire properties of engine compartment fluids, SAE Technical Paper (2005).

DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-1560

Google Scholar

[4] J. Quintiere, A theoretical basis for flammability properties, Fire Mater. 30 (2006) 175-214.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.905

Google Scholar

[5] A. F. Grand, J. O. Trevino, Flammability screening and fire hazard of industrial fluids using the cone calorimeter, Fire Resistance of Industrial Fluids: ASTM International (1996).

DOI: 10.1520/stp16288s

Google Scholar

[6] X. Chen, S. X. Lu, C. H. Li, J. Zhang, K. M. Liew, Experimental study on ignition and combustion characteristics of typical oils, Fire Mater. 38 (2014) 409-417.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.2191

Google Scholar

[7] K. Suzuki, O. Sugawa, A. Yamagishi, K. Miyagi, K. Kamiya, Experimental study on ignition and combustion behaviors of insulation fluids for transformer using cone calorimeter, IEEJ. B. 127 (2007) 797-802.

DOI: 10.1541/ieejpes.127.797

Google Scholar

[8] D. H. Hellebuyck, H. P. Van, T. Magnusson, et al, Fire behaviour of less-combustible dielectric liquids in a nuclear facility. Fire Technol. 52 (2016) 289-308.

DOI: 10.1007/s10694-015-0480-3

Google Scholar

[9] ISO 5660-1, Fire Tests-Reaction to Fire – Heat Release, Smoke Production and Mass Loss Rate, in: Part1:Heat Release Rate (Cone Calorimeter Method) (2015).

DOI: 10.3403/30255889u

Google Scholar

[10] Babrauskas V, Ignition handbook: principles and applications to fire safety engineering, fire investigation, risk management and forensic science, Issaguah, WA, (2003).

DOI: 10.1177/1042391504042549

Google Scholar

[11] M. Janssens, Piloted ignition of wood: a review. Fire Mater. 15 (1991) 151-167.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.810150402

Google Scholar

[12] X. Almeras, B. M. Le, P. Hornsby, et al, Effect of fillers on the fire retardancy of intumescent polypropylene compounds. Polym Degrad Stab. 82 (2003) 325-331.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-3910(03)00187-3

Google Scholar

[13] B. Chen, S. X. Lu, C. H. Li, Q. S. Kang, V. Lecoustre, Initial fuel temperature effects on burning rate of pool fire. J Hazard Mater. 188 (2011) 369-374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.122

Google Scholar

[14] A. Tewarson, Generation of heat and chemical compounds in fires, in: P. J. DiNenno (Eds), SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, (3rd edn), National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts, (2002).

Google Scholar

[15] B. Schartel, T. R. Hull, Development of fire‐retarded materials—Interpretation of cone calorimeter data. Fire Mater. 31 (2007) 327-354.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.949

Google Scholar

[16] C. Jiao, X. Chen, Flammability and thermal degradation of intumescent flame‐retardant polypropylene composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 50 (2010) 767-772.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.21583

Google Scholar

[17] B. Schartel, U. Braun, U. Schwarz, S. Reinemann, Fire retardancy of polypropylene/flax blends. Polymer. 44 (2003) 6241-6250.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00692-x

Google Scholar

[18] S. S. Han, W. K. Chow, Calculating FED and LC50 for testing toxicity of materials in bench-scale tests with a cone calorimeter. Polym. Test. 24 (2005) 920-924.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.06.009

Google Scholar