Analysis of Microbial Community in Heap Bioleaching of Low-Grade Copper Sulfide Ores

Article Preview

Abstract:

High-throughput sequencing technology also known as "next generation" sequencing technology, compared with the traditional sequencing method has the characteristics of fast speed, high flux, low cost. In recent years the technology in the detection of microbial diversity has been fully applied. In this study, the microbial community of ore heap in different area and different depth was studied by using this method. The results showed the bio - heap leaching of low - grade secondary copper sulfide ore in Zijinshan from China could effectively recover the copper in the ore. The number of microorganisms in the center was significantly larger than that on the edge of ore heap, and as the depth increases in the heap, the number of microorganisms decreases. The dominant bacteria in the ore heap center was Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, in addition there were also some Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans, Ferroplasma cupricumulans, Acidithiobacillus caldus and a small amount of Leptospirillum ferriphilum in the center of the ore heap. Unlike the ore heap center, Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans was the main species on the edge of the ore heap, moreover Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Ferroplasma cupricumulans, Acidithiobacillus caldus and a small amount of Leptospirillum ferriphilum were found on the edge of the ore heap. In addition, some heterotrophic bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Serratia, Sediminibacterium, Stenotrophomonas, Brevundimonas and Variovorax were found both in the center and the edge of the sample, these heterotrophic bacteria may be beneficial for the leaching of valuable metals.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

277-281

Citation:

Online since:

August 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wang J, Zhu S, Zhang YS, et al. Bioleaching of low-grade copper sulfide ores by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, J. Journal of Central South University, 21 (2014) 728-734.

DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-1995-3

Google Scholar

[2] Davis-Belmar CS, Cautivo D, Demergasso C, et al. Bioleaching of copper secondary sulfide ore in the presence of chloride by means of inoculation with chloride-tolerant microbial culture, J. Hydrometallurgy, 150 (2014) 308-312.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.09.013

Google Scholar

[3] Shabani MA, Irannajad M, Azadmehr AR, et al. Bioleaching of copper oxide ore by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, J. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials,12 (2013) 1130-1133.

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-013-0845-x

Google Scholar

[4] Ramanathan T, Ting YP. Selective copper bioleaching by pure and mixed cultures of alkaliphilic bacteria isolated from a fly ash landfill site, J. Water Air Pollut, 226 (2015) 373-387.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-015-2641-x

Google Scholar

[5] Zeng WM, Qiu GZ. Development of Heap Bioleaching of Copper Sulphide Ores, J. Metal Mine, 410 (2010) 102-107.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang DZ, Li HX, Ruan RM, Bio - metallurgy of Sulfide Ore and Its Research Progress, J. Mining and Metallurgy, 11 (2002) 9-12.

Google Scholar

[7] Xu Y, Sun YM, Zheng T, et al. Screening strains of desulfurization bacteria by high-throughput sequencing, J. CIESC Journal, 65 (2014) 1808-1814.

Google Scholar

[8] Hao XD, Zeng WM, Peng TX et al. Analysis of microbial diversity during bioleaching of low grade copper ore from Zambia using high—throughput sequencing technology at different temperatures, J. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 25 (2015).

Google Scholar

[9] Teixeira Lia C, Peixoto Raquel S, Cury Juliano C, et al. Bacterial diversity in photosphere soil from Antarctic vascular plants of Admiralty Bay, maritime Antarctica, J. ISME Journal, 8 (2010) 989-1001.

DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2010.35

Google Scholar

[10] Yatsunenko T, Rey F E, Manary M J, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography, J. Nature, 7402 (2012) 222-227.

Google Scholar