Evaluation of Face Milling Operation Parameters on Surface Roughness of Crankcase Housing by Two Level Factorial Design with Center Points

Ukrit Thanasuptawee; Chamrat Thakhamwang; Somsak Siwadamrongpong

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.780.105

Paper Titles

Highly Tm Doped Silica Optical Preform by MCVD - Chelate Vapor Delivery (Soot-Dopant Stepwise Technique)
p.57

Characterization of Crystalline Cu₂SnS₃ Synthesized via Low Temperature Solvothermal Method
p.62

Manufacturing Refractory Bricks Using Exhaust Dust from Foundry Industries
p.67

The Influence of Building Envelop Materials on its Life Cycle Performance: A Case Study of Educational Building in Thailand
p.74

Materials Acceptable for Gas Sensor Design: Advantages and Limitations
p.80

Effect of the Cyclic Extrusion and Compression Processing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-1%Cu Alloy
p.93

Optimization of Cutting Conditions for Turning of Ductile Materials to Achieve Favourable Chip Form
p.98

Evaluation of Face Milling Operation Parameters on Surface Roughness of Crankcase Housing by Two Level Factorial Design with Center Points
p.105

Manufacturing Technology of α-Fe Bonded Grinding Wheel Free Abrasive
p.111

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 780Evaluation of Face Milling Operation Parameters on...

Evaluation of Face Milling Operation Parameters on Surface Roughness of Crankcase Housing by Two Level Factorial Design with Center Points

Abstract:

In this study, there are three machining parameters consist of spindle speed, feed rate and depth of cut which were conducted through full factorial with four center points to determine the effect of machining parameters on the surface roughness and verify whether there is curvature in the model for CNC face milling process in an automotive components manufacturer in Thailand. The workpieces used semi-solid die casted ADC12 aluminum alloy crankcase housing which they were performed by the ARES SEIKI model R5630 3-axis CNC vertical machining center and face milling cutter with diameter of 63 millimeters. The surface roughness of face-milled was measured by the surface roughness tester. It was found that the greatest main effect influence to surface roughness was spindle speed, followed by feed rate and depth of cut at significance level of 0.05.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Material and Manufacturing Technology IX

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 780)

Pages:

105-110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.780.105

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2018

Authors:

Ukrit Thanasuptawee, Chamrat Thakhamwang, Somsak Siwadamrongpong*

Keywords:

ADC12, Face Milling Process, Full Factorial Design, Semi-Solid Aluminum, Surface Roughness

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] M. Okayasu, Y. Miyatomo and K. Morinaka: J. of Metals Vol. 5 (2015), pp.1440-1453.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Thanabumrungkul, S. Janudom, R. Burapa, P. Dulyapraphant and J. Wannasin: Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China Vol. 20 (2010), pp.1016-1021.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(10)60623-1

Google Scholar

[3] J. Wannasin in SEMI-SOLID SLURRY FORMING OF ALLOYS, 1st Edition, Prince of Songkla University, (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] B. Routara, A. Bandyopadhyay and P. Sahoo: The International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology Vol. 40 (2009), pp.1166-1180.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Rawangwong, J. Chatthong, W. Boonchouytan and R. Burapa: Advanced Materials Research. Vol. 747 (2013), pp.777-780.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.747.777

Google Scholar

[6] S. Rawangwong, W. Boonchouytan, J. Chatthong and R. Burapa: Energy Procedia Vol. 34, (2013), pp.854-862.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.822

Google Scholar

[7] S. Rawangwong, J. Chatthong, W. Boonchouytan and R. Burapa: Energy Procedia Vol. 56, (2014), pp.448-457.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.178

Google Scholar

[8] K. Simunovic, G. Simunovic and T. Saric: MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013), pp.265-272.

Google Scholar

[9] M. S. Sukumar, P. VenkataRamaiah and A.Nagarjuna: Procedia Engineering Vol. 97 (2014), p.365 – 371d.

Google Scholar

[10] Information on http://rdo.psu.ac.th/en/news/2014Features-21.php, (2014).

Google Scholar

[11] U. Thanasuptawee, S.Siwadamrongpong, M. Numfu, K. Wongpu: 11th SEATUC Symposium (2017).

Google Scholar