Poly(Butylene Succinate) and Recycled Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Blends Adding GMA as Compatibilizer: Mechanical Properties and Chemical Resistance to Household Chemicals

Nattakarn Hongsriphan; Supakorn Samangain; Yuttanawee Siriteeraphan; Nattakarn Yangcheepyuenyoodee

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.798.291

Paper Titles

The Effects of Replacement Metakaolin with Diatomite in Geopolymer Materials
p.267

The Effects of Biochar Additive on the Properties of Geopolymer Materials
p.273

A Case Study of Recycled Poly(Lactic Acid) Contaminated with Petroleum-Based Thermoplastics Used in Packaging Application
p.279

Preparation and Properties of Composite Films from Poly(Butylene Succinate), Poly(Butylene Adipate-co-Terephthalate) and Zeolite
p.285

Poly(Butylene Succinate) and Recycled Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Blends Adding GMA as Compatibilizer: Mechanical Properties and Chemical Resistance to Household Chemicals
p.291

Effect of ZrO₂ and MgO Addition on Structure, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Composites
p.298

Effect of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) on Thermoelectric Properties of Sodium Cobalt Oxide
p.304

Hydroxylated Natural Rubber Effect on Crystallinity and Mechanical Properties of PLA
p.310

Effect of Alternative Fillers on the Properties of Rubber Compounds
p.316

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 798Poly(Butylene Succinate) and Recycled...

Poly(Butylene Succinate) and Recycled Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Blends Adding GMA as Compatibilizer: Mechanical Properties and Chemical Resistance to Household Chemicals

Abstract:

Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (rPET) from post-consumer drinking bottles was added into poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), which aimed to improve chemical resistance and also reduce cost. PBS and rPET with the weight ratios of 100/0, 90/10, 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, and 50/50 wt% were melt blended using glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) of 0, 3, and 5 phr as a compatibilizer and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) of 0.5 phr as an initiator. It was found that increasing rPET content enhanced Young’s modulus of the blends. However, tensile strength, and elongation at break of the blends were reduced due to phase separation. Incorporating GMA improved chemical compatibility resulting the PBS/rPET blends to have higher tensile strength and elongation at break. Compared to pure PBS, blending rPET improved chemical resistance to household chemicals such as bathroom cleaning liquid (hydrochloric acid based) and bleaching liquid, which the blends adding GMA showed even better chemical resistance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 798)

Pages:

291-297

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.798.291

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2019

Authors:

Nattakarn Hongsriphan*, Supakorn Samangain, Yuttanawee Siriteeraphan, Nattakarn Yangcheepyuenyoodee

Keywords:

Chemical Resistance, GMA, Poly(Butylene Succinate), Recycled PET

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] V. Ojijo and S. S. Ray: Prog. Mater. Sci. 62 (2014) 1-57.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Fraïsse, V. Verney, S. Commereuc and M. Obadal: Polym. Degrad. Stab. 90 (2005) 250-255.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.019

Google Scholar

[3] A. FÁvila and M. VDuarte: Polym. Degrad. Stab. 80 (2003) 373-382.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Zhang, W. Guo, Y. Yu, B. Li and C. Wu: Eur. Polym. J. 43 (2007) 3662-3670.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Threepopnatkul, C. Wongnarat, W. Intolo, S. Suato and C. Kulsetthanchalee: Energy Procedia 56 (2014) 102-111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.137

Google Scholar

[6] N. Hongsriphan, A. Popanna, A. Eksirinimit, P. Naneraksa and S. Soponsiriwat: 72nd Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers (ANTEC 2014) Las Vegas; United States (2014) 348-353.

Google Scholar

[7] R. S. Chen, M. H. A. Ghani, M. N. Salleh, S. Ahmad and S. Gan: Mat. Sci. App. 5 (2014) 943-952.

Google Scholar

[8] N. C. Thanh, C. Ruksakulpiwat and Y. Ruksakulpiwat: J. Mater. Sci. Chem. Eng. 3 (2015) 102-107.

Google Scholar

[9] C.-F. Kuan, C.-C. M. Ma, H.-C. Kuan, H.-L. Wu and Y.-M. Liao: Compos. Sci. Technol. 66 (2006) 2231-2241.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Chinda and N. Hongsriphan: 10th Eco-Energy and Materials Science and Engineering Symposium Ubon ratchathani, Thailand (2012) 860-865.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Kumar, S. Mohanty, S. K. Nayak and M. R. Parvaiz: Bioresour. Technol. 101 (2010) 8406–8415.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Al-Itry, K. Lamnawar and A. Maazouz: Polym. Degrad. Stab. 97 (2012) 1898-1914.

Google Scholar

[13] P. Rizzarelli and S. Carroccio: Polym. Degrad. Stab. 94 (2009) 1825-1838.

Google Scholar