Investigating the Impacts of Heterogeneous Infills on Structural Strength of 3D Printed Parts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Additive Manufacturing is a manufacturing process based on layers for making three dimensional scaled physical parts directly from 3D CAD data. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is widely used technology that provides functional prototypes in various thermoplastics. In additive manufacturing, filling patterns are of two types; External and Internal filling patterns. Multiple patterns are developed for both filling categories. In this work, a heterogeneous infill strategy is used by choosing developed patterns in order to improve strength to weight ratio, material usage and build time for parts. A rectilinear pattern combination with triangular and rectangular pattern has been chosen for 3D printing. The tensile testing is performed on the printed specimens to calculate the strength to weight ratio. By comparing the obtained results, a strategy based on maximum strength to weight ratio, minimum material usage and reduced build time is recommended for FDM technology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

276-281

Citation:

Online since:

April 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gu, D. (2015). Laser Additive Manufacturing of High-Performance Materials. New York Dordrecht London: Springer.

Google Scholar

[2] D T Pham, R. S. (1998). A comparison of rapid prototyping Technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38 (10-11) , 1257-1287.

Google Scholar

[3] Ian Gibson, D. R. (2010). Additive Manufacturing Technologies 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping and Direct Digital Manufacturing. New York Dordrecht London: Springer Science & Business Media.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3

Google Scholar

[4] Information on http://www.stratasys.com.

Google Scholar

[5] Information on https://www.tth.com/3d-printing/fdm-prototyping.

Google Scholar

[6] Yuan Jin, Y. H. (2016). Process Planning for the Fuse Deposition Modeling of Ankle Foot Orthoses. 18th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining, 760-765, ELSEVIER.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.315

Google Scholar

[7] Choi S, C. H. (2006). A topological hierarchy-based approach to toolpath planning for multi material layered manufacturing. Computer Aided Design, 38:143-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2005.08.005

Google Scholar

[8] Jin Y, H. Y. (2014). Optimization of tool-path generation for material extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology. Additive Manufacturing, 1:32-47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.004

Google Scholar

[9] Information on https://www.3dhubs.com.

Google Scholar

[10] Umair Ali Rana, D. S. (2015). Development of design methodology for biomimetic adaptive infills for additive manufacturing. Rawalpindi: CEME, NUST.

Google Scholar

[11] Hodgson, G. (2013). Slic3r User Manual. Free Software Folks.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on https://ultimaker.com/en/resources/20416-infill.

Google Scholar

[13] Yong Huang, M. L. (2015). Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4028725

Google Scholar

[14] Yuan Jin, Y. H. (2017). A non-retraction path planning approach for extrusion based additive manufacturing. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 48, 132-44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.03.008

Google Scholar

[15] Hao L., R. D. (2010). Enhancing the sustainability of additive manufacturing. International Conference on Responsive Manufacturing-Green Manufacturing, 390-5.

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2010.0462

Google Scholar

[16] Yuan Jin, J. D. (2017). Optimization of process planning for reducing material consumption in Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 44, 65–78.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.05.003

Google Scholar

[17] Yuan Jin, Y. H. (2017). A novel path planning methodology for extrusion based additive manufacturing of thin walled parts. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing.

DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2017.1307526

Google Scholar

[18] F. Roger, (2015). Optimal design of fused deposition modeling structure using comsol Multiphysics. Proceedings of the 2015 COMSOL conference, Grenoble.

Google Scholar