Revisiting the Deshpande-Fleck Foam Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

The self-similar isotropic hardening model developed by Deshpande and Fleck has been widely used. An important issue in this model is to determine the value of ellipticity. The ellipticity was treated as a constant in the subsequent yield, but different values were suggested in the literature. In this paper a cell-based finite element model based on the 3D Voronoi technique is used to verify the Deshpande-Fleck foam model. It is found that the ellipticity determined from uniaxial and hydrostatic compressions varies with the equivalent plastic strain.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

134-139

Citation:

Online since:

May 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Miller RE. A continuum plasticity model for the constitutive and indentation behaviour of foamed metals. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (2000);42(4):729–54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00021-1

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang J, Kikuchi N, Li VC, Yee AF, Nusholtz GS. Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering (1998); 21(5): 369–86.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00087-0

Google Scholar

[4] Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids (2000); 48 (6–7): 1253–1283.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00082-4

Google Scholar

[5] Gioux G, McCormack TM, Gibson LJ. Failure of aluminium foams under multiaxial loads. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (2000); 42(6): 1097–117.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00043-0

Google Scholar

[6] Sridhar I, Fleck NA. The multiaxial yield behaviour of an aluminium alloy foam. Journal of Materials Science (2005); 40(15): 4005–4008.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-1916-9

Google Scholar

[7] Zhou ZW, Wang ZH, Zhao LM, Shu XF. Uniaxial and biaxial failure behaviors of aluminum alloy foams. Composites Part B: Engineering (2014); 61: 340–349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.004

Google Scholar

[8] LS-DYNA. Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] ABAQUS. Version 6.11, Dassault Systems Simulia Corporation, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] Hanssen AG, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M, Ilstad, H. Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences (2002); 44(2): 359–406.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(01)00091-1

Google Scholar

[11] Liu QL, Subhash G. A phenomenological constitutive model for foams under large deformations. Polymer Engineering & Science (2004); 44(3): 463–473.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.20041

Google Scholar

[12] Avalle M, Belingardi G, Ibba A. Mechanical models of cellular solids: parameters identification from experimental tests. International Journal of Impact Engineering (2007); 34(1): 3–27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.012

Google Scholar

[13] Zheng ZJ, Wang CF, Yu JL, Reid SR, Harrigan JJ. Dynamic stress–strain states for metal foams using a 3D cellular model. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids (2014); 72:93–114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.013

Google Scholar

[14] Ding YY, Wang SL, Zheng ZJ, Yang LM, Yu JL. On the stress–strain states of cellular materials under high loading rates. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters (2016); 6(3): 122–125.

DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2016.05.001

Google Scholar

[15] Lan XK, Feng SS, Huang Q, Zhou T. Blast response of continues-density graded cellular material based on the 3D Voronoi model. Defence Technology. (In press).

DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2018.06.003

Google Scholar

[16] Yang J, Wang SL, Ding YY, Zheng ZJ, Yu JL. Crashworthiness of graded cellular materials: A design strategy based on a nonlinear plastic shock model. Materials Science and Engineering: A (2017); 680: 411–420.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.010

Google Scholar

[17] Huang SN, Ding YY, Wang SL, He SY, Zheng ZJ, Yu JL. Experimental investigation of dynamic material parameters of closed-cell aluminium foams (in Chinese). Journal of Experimental Mechanics. (In press).

Google Scholar

[18] Zhang XY, Tang LQ, Liu ZJ, Jiang ZY, Liu YP, Wu YD. Yield properties of closed-cell aluminum foam under triaxial loadings by a 3D Voronoi model. Mechanics of Materials (2017); 104: 73–84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.10.007

Google Scholar

[19] Ayyagari RS, Vural M. Multiaxial yield surface of transversely isotropic foams: Part I—Modeling. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids (2015); 74: 49–67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.10.005

Google Scholar