In-Process Laser Re-Melting of Thin Walled Parts to Improve Surface Quality after Laser Metal Deposition

Abstract:

Laser metal deposition (LMD) is an additive manufacturing process highly adaptable to medium to large sized components with bulky structures as well as thin walls. Low surface quality of as-deposited LMD manufactured components with average roughness values (R_a) around 15-20μm is one of the main drawbacks that prevent the use of the part without the implementation of costly and time-consuming post-processes. In this work laser re-melting is applied right after LMD process with the use of the same equipment used for the deposition to treat AISI 316L thin walled parts. The surface quality improvement is assessed through the measurement of both areal surface roughness S_a(0.8mm) QUOTE and waviness W_a QUOTE (0.8mm) parameters. Moreover, roughness power spectrum is used to point out the presence of principal periodical components both in the as-deposited and in the re-melted surfaces. Then, the transfer function is calculated to better understand the effects of laser re-melting on the topography evolution, measuring the changes of individual components contributing to the surface roughness such as the layering technique and the presence of sintered particles. Experiments showed that while low energy density inputs are not capable to properly modify the additive surface topography, excessive energy inputs impose a strong periodical component with wavelength equal to the laser scan spacing and directionality determined by the used strategy. When a proper amount of energy density input is used, laser re-melting is capable to generate smooth isotropic topographies without visible periodical surface structures.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 813)
• Pages: 191-196
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.813.191
• Online since: July 2019
• Authors: Francesco Bruzzo, Guendalina Catalano, Ali Gökhan Demir*, Barbara Previtali
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Direct Energy Deposition, Laser Metal Deposition, Laser Re-Melting, Post-Processing, Surface Roughness

References

[1] F. Liebana, E. Ukar, D. del Pozo, A. Lamikiz, L. N. López de Lacalle, J. M. Etayo, Laser Polishing Operation for Die and Moulds Finishing, Adv. Mater. Res. 83–86 (2009) 818–825.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.83-86.818

[2] A. Temmler, E. Willenborg, K. Wissenbach, Design surfaces by laser remelting, Materwiss. Werksttech. 46(2015) 692–703.

DOI: 10.1002/mawe.201500345

[3] J.P. Kruth, E. Yasa, J. Deckers, Roughness improvement in selective laser melting, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Polym. Mould. Innov. (2008) 170–183.

[4] C. De Giorgi, V. Furlan, A. G. Demir, E. Tallarita, G. Candiani, B. Previtali, Laser micropolishing of AISI 304 stainless steel surfaces for cleanability and bacteria removal capability, Appl. Surf. Sci. 406 (2017) 199–211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.083

[5] M. Gharbi et al., Influence of various process conditions on surface finishes induced by the direct metal deposition laser technique on a Ti-6Al-4V alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213 (2013) 791–800.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.015

[6] M. Rombouts, G. Maes, W. Hendrix, E. Delarbre, F. Motmans, Surface finish after laser metal deposition, Phys. Procedia 41 (2013) 810–814.

DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.152

[7] H. Kong, R. Leach, A. Thompson, and N. Senin, A metrology horror story : the additive surface, ASPEN/ASPE 2017 Spring Topical Meeting on Manufacture and Metrology of Structured and Freeform Surfaces for Functional Applications (2017) 14–17.

[8] M. Wieland, P. Hänggi, W. Hotz, M. Textor, B. A. Keller, N. D. Spencer, Wavelength-dependent measurement and evaluation of surface topographies: Application of a new concept of window roughness and surface transfer function, Wear 237 (2000) 231–252.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(99)00347-6

[9] ISO 3274, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Profile method - Nominal characteristics of contact (stylus) instruments, (1996), p.13.

DOI: 10.3403/01371273

[10] B. S. E. N. Iso, Geometrical Product Specifications ( GPS ) — Surface texture : Profile method — Metrological char- acteristics of phase correct filters, (1998).

DOI: 10.3403/01414437

[11] ISO, ISO 4287 - Geometrical product specification ( GPS ) - Surface texture : Profile method - Terms , definitions and surface texture parameters, (2009).

DOI: 10.3403/02031657

[12] A. M. K. Hafiz, E. V. Bordatchev, R. O. Tutunea-Fatan, Influence of overlap between the laser beam tracks on surface quality in laser polishing of AISI H13 tool steel, J. Manuf. Process. 14 (2012) 425–434.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.004