Numerical Constitutive Models of Low Tensile Strength Materials for the Description of Mechanical Behavior of Rammed Earth Masonry

Article Preview

Abstract:

The preservation and enhancement of traditional earthen masonry structures as well as the practice of new construction with raw earth material is nowadays matter of investigation. At this stage of research, experimental analysis needs to be supported by numerical analysis to corroborate and interpret results and, successively, to extend the analysis to more complex load conditions, tune design methods and define quick verification formulas for simple structures. For this reason, constitutive models provided by engineering simulation software for mechanical analysis, to describe low tensile strength materials, have been used to reproduce mechanical tests and have been compared. The arch was selected as the best case study to test the response of constitutive models suitable for a low tensile strength material and, in a successive stage of research, the efficiency and the modelling of reinforcement techniques.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

30-36

Citation:

Online since:

August 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ciancio D, Jaquin P, Walker P. Advances on the assessment of soil suitability for rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 2013;42:40–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.049

Google Scholar

[2] Hall M, Djerbib Y. Rammed earth sample production: Context, recommendations and consistency. Constr Build Mater 2004;18:281–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.001

Google Scholar

[3] Jayasinghe C, Kamaladasa N. Compressive strength characteristics of cement stabilized rammed earth walls. Constr Build Mater 2007;21:1971–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.049

Google Scholar

[4] Miccoli L, Müller U, Fontana P. Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Constr Build Mater 2014;61:327–39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009

Google Scholar

[5] Loccarini F. Behaviour of rammed earth structures: sustainable materials and strengthening techniques. Doctorate Thesis. University of Florence; University of Braunschweig - Institute of Tecnology, (2017).

Google Scholar

[6] Miccoli L, Oliveira D V., Silva R a., Müller U, Schueremans L. Static behaviour of rammed earth: experimental testing and finite element modelling. Mater Struct 2014:3443–56.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0411-7

Google Scholar

[7] Bui QB, Morel JC, Venkatarama Reddy B V., Ghayad W. Durability of rammed earth walls exposed for 20 years to natural weathering. Build Environ 2009;44:912–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.001

Google Scholar

[8] Bui Q-B, Hans S, Morel J-C, Do A-P. First exploratory study on dynamic characteristics of rammed earth buildings. Eng Struct 2011;33:3690–5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.004

Google Scholar

[9] Jaquin P. A. Analysis of historic rammed earth construction. 2008. Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2169/.

Google Scholar

[10] Nabouch R El, Bui Q, Perrotin P, Plé O, Plassiard JP. Modélisation numérique de structures en pisé : analyses et recommandations Rencontres Universitaires de G´enie Civil, May 2015, Bayonne, France.

Google Scholar

[11] Fagone M, Loccarini F, Ranocchiai G. Strength evaluation of jute fabric for the reinforcement of rammed earth structures. Compos Part B Eng 2017;113:1–13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.054

Google Scholar

[12] Loccarini F, Fagone M, Ranocchiai G, García Manrique JA, Ruiz Checa JR. Bonding capacity of jute fabric reinforcements of earthen structural elements. An experimental analysis. Brick Block Mason. Trends, Innov. Challenges - Proc. 16th Int. Brick Block Mason. Conf. IBMAC 2016, 2016, p.843–8.

DOI: 10.1201/b21889-105

Google Scholar

[13] Briccoli Bati S, Fagone M, Loccarini F, Ranocchiai G. Jute fabric to improve the mechanical properties of rammed earth constructions. Versus2014 - Earthen Archit., 2015, p.55–60.

DOI: 10.1201/b17392-14

Google Scholar

[14] Briccoli Bati S, Fagone M, Loccarini F, Ranocchiai G. Analysis of rammed earth arches strengthened with natural fibers. Civil-Comp Proc 2013;102.

DOI: 10.4203/ccp.102.78

Google Scholar

[15] Briccoli Bati S, Fagone M, Rotunno T. Lower Bound Limit Analysis of Masonry Arches with CFRP Reinforcements: A Numerical Method. J Compos Constr 2013;17:543–53.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000350

Google Scholar

[16] Fagone M, Kloft H, Loccarini F, Ranocchiai G. Jute fabric as a reinforcement for rammed earth structures. Compos Part B 2019:107064.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107064

Google Scholar

[17] Rotunno T, Fagone M, Bertolesi E, Grande E, Milani G. Single lap shear tests of masonry curved pillars externally strengthened by CFRP strips. Compos Struct 2018;200:434–48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.097

Google Scholar

[18] Corbin A, Augarde C. Fracture Energy of Stabilised Rammed Earth. Procedia Mater Sci 2014;3:1675–80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.270

Google Scholar

[19] ADINA, Theory and Modeling Guide, Vol I: ADINA solids &Structures, August 2015, ADINA R & D, Inc., 71 Elton Avenue, Watertown, MA 02472 USA.

Google Scholar

[20] ABAQUS 2018. Theory and user's manuals 2018. Pawtucket (RI, USA): Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen.

Google Scholar

[21] ANSYS. ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference. Release 19. ANSYS Inc Southpointe 2600 ANSYS Drive Canonsburg, PA.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811768-2.00022-5

Google Scholar