Anisotropy Evaluation of Different Raster Directions, Spatial Orientations, and Fill Percentage of 3D Printed PETG Tensile Test Specimens

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the mechanical properties of Polyethylene terephthalate-glycol (PETG) tensile test specimens have been investigated. The test pieces were prepared using fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing technology. Three print settings were examined which are: raster direction angles, print orientations, and infill percentage and patterns in order to evaluate the anisotropy of objects when employing FDM print method. The variations in stress-strain curves, tensile strength values and elongation at break among the tested samples were studied and compared. Illustration for the broken specimens after the tensile test was accomplished to know how the test pieces printed with various parameters were fractured. A comparison with some previous results regarding the elongation at break has been carried out.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

167-173

Citation:

Online since:

September 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.A.M. Tofail, E.P. Koumoulos, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, L. O'Donoghue, C. Charitidis, Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities, Mater. Today 21 (2017) 22–37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001

Google Scholar

[2] X. Wang, M. Jiang, Z. Zhou, J. Gou, D. Hui, 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective, Compos. Part B Eng. 110 (2017) 442–458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034

Google Scholar

[3] Q. Sun, G.M. Rizvi, C.T. Bellehumeur, P. Gu, Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments, Rapid Prototyp. J. 14 (2008) 72–80.

DOI: 10.1108/13552540810862028

Google Scholar

[4] P. Tran, T.D. Ngo, A. Ghazlan, D. Hui, Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings, Compos. Part B Eng. 108 (2017) 210–223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.083

Google Scholar

[5] G. Postiglione, G. Natale, G. Griffini, M. Levi, S. Turri, Conductive 3D microstructures by direct 3D printing of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites via liquid deposition modeling, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 76 (2015) 110–114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Zhuang, W. Song, G. Ning, X. Sun, Z. Sun, G. Xu, B. Zhang, Y. Chen, S. Tao, 3D–printing of materials with anisotropic heat distribution using conductive polylactic acid composites, Mater. Des. 126 (2017) 135–140.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.047

Google Scholar

[7] C.-C. Kuo, L.-C. Liu, W.-F. Teng, H.-Y. Chang, F.-M. Chien, S.-J. Liao, W.-F. Kuo, C.-M. Chen, Preparation of starch/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers (ABS) biomass alloys and their feasible evaluation for 3D printing applications, Compos. Part B Eng. 86 (2016) 36–39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.005

Google Scholar

[8] R.B. Dupaix, M.C. Boyce, Finite strain behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene terephthalate)-glycol (PETG), Polymer (Guildf). 46 (2005) 4827–4838.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.083

Google Scholar

[9] A. Locker, PETG filament guide 2018 - Explained, compared and reviewed, (2018).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Domingo-Espin, J.M. Puigoriol-Forcada, A.A. Garcia-Granada, J. Llumà, S. Borros, G. Reyes, Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling Polycarbonate parts, Mater. Des. 83 (2015) 670–677.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074

Google Scholar

[11] C. Casavola, A. Cazzato, V. Moramarco, C. Pappalettere, Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory, Mater. Des. 90 (2016) 453–458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009

Google Scholar

[12] A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, S.S. Mahapatra, Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts, Mater. Des. 31 (2010) 287–295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016

Google Scholar

[13] L. Wang, D.J. Gardner, Contribution of printing parameters to the interfacial strength of polylactic acid (PLA) in material extrusion additive manufacturing, Prog. Addit. Manuf. 3 (2018) 165–171.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-018-0041-7

Google Scholar

[14] T. Galeta, P. Raos, J. Stojšić, I. Pakši, Influence of Structure on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Objects, Procedia Eng. 149 (2016) 100–104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.644

Google Scholar

[15] F. Ning, W. Cong, Y. Hu, H. Wang, Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties, J. Compos. Mater. 51 (2017) 451–462.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998316646169

Google Scholar

[16] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 527-2:2012: Plastics - Determination of tensile properties - Part 2: Test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics, (2012).

DOI: 10.3403/30216860

Google Scholar

[17] C.M.O. Müller, J.B. Laurindo, F. Yamashita, Effect of cellulose fibers on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of starch-based films at different relative humidity values, Carbohydr. Polym. 77 (2009) 293–299.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.030

Google Scholar