Comparison of Predicted Forming Limit Curves with Measured Experimental Data on Hot-Dip Zinc-Coated Cold-Rolled Steel by Incremental Forming Process

Ramil Kesvarakul; Khompee Limpadapun

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.821.256

Paper Titles

Non-Oriented Silicon Iron Alloys Used in Efficient Electrical Motor Production
p.229

The Influence of Un-DRXed Grains on Mechanical Properties of Mg-Zn-Mn-La-Ce Alloys
p.237

Micro-Embossing Process in Ultrafine-Grained Pure Aluminum Processed by Equal-Channel Angular Pressing with Elevated Temperature
p.244

Thermal Stability of Nanocrystalline Soft Magnetic Alloys with Different Inhibitors
p.250

Comparison of Predicted Forming Limit Curves with Measured Experimental Data on Hot-Dip Zinc-Coated Cold-Rolled Steel by Incremental Forming Process
p.256

Preparing the Melt for the Amorphous and Nanocrystalline State
p.263

Electrophoretic Deposition of Polyaniline on a Copper Substrate and its Application in Corrosion Resistance
p.273

Study of Corrosion Behaviour of Carbon Steel in Evian Derived Solution from Electrochemical Techniques
p.280

Tool Wear in Intermittent Cutting of AISI 304 Stainless Steel by Thermally-Sprayed Coatings
p.287

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 821Comparison of Predicted Forming Limit Curves with...

Comparison of Predicted Forming Limit Curves with Measured Experimental Data on Hot-Dip Zinc-Coated Cold-Rolled Steel by Incremental Forming Process

Abstract:

Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) is a die-less forming process with advantages of high-flexibility, low-cost and short lead time. The high local strains that are applied to the metal sheet, often exceeding the conventional formability limit. This paper is focused on comparison of predicted forming limit curves with measured experimental data on Hot-Dip Zinc-Coated Cold-Rolled sheet, with 0.20 mm thick is studied in single point incremental forming. Truncated square pyramid and cone are formed to study the formability of blank sheets at room temperature. It was found that both Formulation of plastic instability criteria and Keeler’s formula gives the lowest FLC. FLDs have predicted failures in forming process consistently with the real experiments. The experimentally obtained cracking limit differ from analytical one and empirical one by about 3.398 and 2.135 true strain respectively at FLD₀, the corresponding plane strain values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 821)

Pages:

256-262

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.821.256

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2019

Authors:

Ramil Kesvarakul*, Khompee Limpadapun

Keywords:

Deformation Mechanism, Forming Limit Curves, Incremental Forming Process

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Y.H. Kim, J.J. Park, Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 130-131 (2002), 42-46.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00788-4

Google Scholar

[2] J.J. Park, Y.H. Kim, Fundamental studies on the incremental sheet metal forming technique, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140 (2003), 447– 453.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00768-4

Google Scholar

[3] G.Ambrogio, L. De Napoli, L.Filice, F.Gagliardi, M.Muzzupappa, Application of incremental forming process for high customized medical product manufacturing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 204 (2005), 290–303.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.148

Google Scholar

[4] J. Cao,Y. Huang, N.V. Reddy, R. Malhotra, Y. Wang, Incremental sheet forming: Advances and challenges. Proceedings of International Conference on Technology of Plasticity Kyongju, Korea (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] M.Subramanian, M.Sakthivel, K.Sooryaprakash, R.Sudhakaran, Optimization of end mill tool geometry parameters for Al7075-T6 machining operations based on vibration amplitude by response surface methodology, Measurement, 46 (2013), 4005–4022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.015

Google Scholar

[6] Amit Kohli, Hari Singh, Optimization of processing parameters in induction hardening using response surface methodology, Indian Academy of Sciences, 36 (2011), 141–152.

DOI: 10.1007/s12046-011-0020-x

Google Scholar

[7] Altan, T., & Erman, T. A. , Sheet Metal Forming Processes and Applications. Ohio, United State of America: The Materials Information Society.(2012).

Google Scholar