Acoustic Emission Signals of Pull-Off Test for Concrete Slab Strengthened with CFRP Using Various Surface Preparations

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates the acoustic emission signals of concrete slab strengthened with carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) under pull-off test. Three types of surface preparations were prepared namely without surface preparation, normal surface preparation and boring surface preparation. The slabs were then tested under pull-off test in conjunction with acoustic emission technique. The pull-off strength, acoustic signal strength, amplitude, duration and rise time were analysed and discussed. It was found that the boring surface preparation produced the highest pull-off strength compared to other surface preparations, indicating good bonding between the CFRP and the concrete interface. This study is useful in identifying the bonding between CFRP and concrete using acoustic emission technique.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

479-485

Citation:

Online since:

September 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Fazli, A.Y. Mohd Yassin, N. Shafiq, and W. Teo, Pull-off testing as an interfacial bond strength assessment of CFRP-concrete interface exposed to a marine environment,, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 84, p.335 – 342, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.015

Google Scholar

[2] R. Ghavidel, R. Madandoust, and M.M. Ranjbar, Reliability of pull-off test for steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete,, Measurement, vol. 73, p.628 – 639, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.013

Google Scholar

[3] E. Bonaldo, J.A.O. Barros, and P.B. Lourenco, Bond characterization between concrete substrate and repairing SFRC using pull-off testing,, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, vol. 25, p.463 – 474, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.01.002

Google Scholar

[4] N.M.M. Ramos, M.L. Simoes, , J.M.P.Q Delgado, and V.P. Freitas, Reliability of the pull-off test for in situ evaluation of adhesion strength,, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 31, p.86 – 93, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.097

Google Scholar

[5] M.N. Noorsuhada, Structural health monitoring through acoustic emission,, in Eco-Efficient Repair and Rehabilitation of Concrete Infrastructures, F. Pacheco-Torgal, Robert E. Melchers, Xianming Shi, Nele De Belie, Kim Van Tittelboom, and Andrés Sáez, Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, 2018, pp.123-146.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102181-1.00006-x

Google Scholar

[6] E. ASTM 1316, Standard terminology for nondestructive examinations,, ASTM International, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Huang, L. Jiang, P.K. Liaw, C.R. Brooks, R. Seeley, and D.L. Klarstrom, Using acoustic emission in fatigue and fracture materials research,, Journal of Materials, vol. 50, no. 11, (1999).

Google Scholar

[8] BS 1881-125, Testing concrete. Methods for mixing and sampling fresh concrete in the laboratory,, British Standard Ltd., (1986).

Google Scholar

[9] W.T. Lee, Y.J. Chiou, and M.H. Shih, Reinforced concrete beam–column joint strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer,, Composite Structures, vol. 92, p.48–60, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.06.011

Google Scholar

[10] M.N. Noorsuhada, An overview on fatigue damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission technique,, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 112, p.429 – 439, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.206

Google Scholar

[11] N. Md Nor, A. Ibrahim, N. Muhamad Bunnori, and H. Mohd Saman, Acoustic emission signal for fatigue crack classification on reinforced concrete beam,, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 49, pp.583-590, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.057

Google Scholar

[12] N. Md Nor, A. Ibrahim, N. Muhamad Bunnori, H. Mohd Saman, S.N. Mat Saliah, and S. Shahidan, Diagnostic of fatigue damage severity on reinforced concrete beam using acoustic emission Technique,, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 41, pp.1-9, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.07.015

Google Scholar

[13] O.R. Mata, and R.A. Atadero, Evaluation of pull-off tests as a FRP-concrete bond testing method in the laboratory and field,, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, vol. 19, no. 2, (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000170

Google Scholar

[14] N. Md Nor, and S.N. Mat Saliah, Acoustic signal strength for damage evaluation of reinforced concrete beam, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, (2016).

Google Scholar

[15] J. Xu, Nondestructive evaluation of prestressed concrete structures by means of acoustic emissions monitoring,, PhD Thesis. Auburn University, (2008).

Google Scholar

[16] A. Pollock, Inspecting bridges with acoustic emission-inspection details about in service steel bridges and monitoring weld operations: Application guidelines,, Physical Acoustic Corporation, (1995).

Google Scholar

[17] M. Hrairi, Statistical signal processing and sorting for acoustic emission monitoring of high-temperature pressure components,, Experimental Mechanics, p.35–43. (2009).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2008.00418.x

Google Scholar

[18] T.J. Fowler, and E. Gray, Development of as acoustic emission test for FRP equipment,, American Society of Civil Engineers convention and exposition, (1979).

Google Scholar