Computational Analysis of Resistance to Alveolar Bone Resorption of Osseointegrated Implant

Aldilla Miranda; Yanti Rusyanti; Ina Hendiani; Tatacipta Dirgantara; Prajna Metta; Dyah Nindita Carolina

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.829.241

Paper Titles

The Effect of Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Bone Graft (Carbonate Apatite) Applications on Platelet Derived Growth Factor-BB Post Flap Surgery in Patients with Chronic Periodontitis
p.211

The Effect of Green Betle Leaf Gel (Piper Betle Leaf) to Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) Level after Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) Treatment
p.220

Calcium Hydroxide as Intracanal Medicament in Pulp Necrosis with Periapical Lesion : A Case Report
p.226

White MTA as a Material to Seal Iatrogenic Perforation for Furcation Teeth: A Case Report
p.232

Computational Analysis of Resistance to Alveolar Bone Resorption of Osseointegrated Implant
p.241

Characterization of Dental Lab Putty Materials Components Made from Glutinous Rice
p.247

The Influence of Alteration of kVp and mAs towards the Image Quality of Acrylic Using CBCT
p.252

Effect of 0.1% Genipin as a Crosslinking Agent to Degradability of Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF)
p.258

Preparation and Characterization of Terpenoid-Encapsulated PLGA Microparticles and its Antibacterial Activity against Enterococcus faecalis
p.263

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 829Computational Analysis of Resistance to Alveolar...

Computational Analysis of Resistance to Alveolar Bone Resorption of Osseointegrated Implant

Abstract:

Dental implant failure started with a resorption on alveolar crest. Resorption occurred if the stress is greater than the strength threshold (ultimate strength). Bones carrying mechanical loads adapt their strength to the load applied on it by bone modelling or remodelling; by apposition or destruction depends on internal stress level distributed on the bones. This research was conducted using FEM on a CBCT image of model which were implanted and converted into computerized 3D finite element digital model. The model was given material properties, fixed support, and being simulated on occlusal loads of 87 N and friction loads of 29 N for 0,7 seconds.Maximum princip al loads on alveolar bone of implant model was 41 Mpa and still below the ultimate strength (69 MPa). Based on the stress level above, it may be concluded that alveolar bone on implant model has good resistance towards resorption.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 829)

Pages:

241-246

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.829.241

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2019

Authors:

Aldilla Miranda*, Yanti Rusyanti, Ina Hendiani, Tatacipta Dirgantara, Prajna Metta, Dyah Nindita Carolina

Keywords:

Alveolar Bone, Dental Implant, Finite Element Method, Resorption

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] K.E. Misch, Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Mosby Elsevier., St. Louis Missouri, 2008, pp.543-596.

Google Scholar

[2] M.G. Newman, H.H. Takei, P.R. Klokkevold, F.A. Carranza, Carranza's Clinical Periodontology, 9th ed., Mosby Elsevier., St. Louis Missouri, 2003, pp.882-887.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Isidor, Influence of forces on peri-implant bone, Clin Oral Implants Res. 17 (2006) 8-18.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01360.x

Google Scholar

[4] Osstem Implant R&D Center. Osstem Implant Documentations, Osstem Implant System, 2013, pp.8-11.

DOI: 10.26226/morressier.5ac383202afeeb00097a47c9

Google Scholar

[5] H.L. Huang, C.H. Chang, J.T. Hsu, A.M. Fallgatter, CC. Ko, Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 22(4) (2007) 551-562.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01124.x

Google Scholar

[6] M. Cicciù, E. Bramanti, F. Cecchetti, L. Scappaticci, E. Guglielmino, FEM and Von Mises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution, Oral Implant. 7(1) (2014) 1-10.

DOI: 10.11138/orl/2014.7.1.001

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Okazaki, Comparison of fatigue properties and fatigue crack growth rates of various implantable metals, Materials (Basel). 5(12) (2012) 2981-3005.

DOI: 10.3390/ma5122981

Google Scholar

[8] C.R. Hassler, E.F. Rybicki, K.D. Cummings, L.C. Clark, Quantification of bone stresses during remodeling, J Biomech. 13(2) (1980) 185-190.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90192-x

Google Scholar

[9] J. Schrotenboer, Y.P. Tsao, V. Kinariwala, H.L. Wang, Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal bone stress levels: a finite element analysis, J Periodontol. 79(11) (2008) 2166-2172.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.080178

Google Scholar

[10] T.O. Albrektsson, C.B. Johansson, L. Sennerby, Biological aspects of implant dentistry: osseointegration, Periodontol 2000. 4 (1994) 58-73.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00006.x

Google Scholar