Shape Memory Effect of Polycrystalline Ni54Mn25Ga17.5Ta0.5 High Temperature Shape Memory Alloy with Wide Hysteresis Loop

Shun Yao Hui; Chao Ran Li; Tong Wang; Jing Wei Xie; Gui Fu Dong

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.837.35

Paper Titles

Investigation of the Structure and Properties of Deformed Semi-Finished Products from Alloys of the Al-REM System Made by the Method of Ingotless Rolling-Extruding
p.9

Creep Propagation Research for the Interface Cavities of the 316L Stainless Steel Diffusion Welded Joint
p.16

Performance of 316L Stainless Steel Diffusion Welding during High Temperature Creep
p.22

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 3-Wire Electroslag Welded (ESW) High-Speed Pearlitic Rail Steel Joint
p.28

Shape Memory Effect of Polycrystalline Ni₅₄Mn₂₅Ga_17.5Ta_0.5 High Temperature Shape Memory Alloy with Wide Hysteresis Loop
p.35

Investigation of the Deformation Twins on the Bending Cross Section of TA2 Titanium Sheet
p.41

Ceramic Surface Treatment of Aluminum Alloy
p.46

Effects of Microstructure and Shock Prestrain on the Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy
p.51

Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Electrode Strips on Spot-Welding Process
p.58

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 837Shape Memory Effect of Polycrystalline...

Shape Memory Effect of Polycrystalline Ni₅₄Mn₂₅Ga_17.5Ta_0.5 High Temperature Shape Memory Alloy with Wide Hysteresis Loop

Abstract:

Effect of Ta-alloying on microstructure, martensitic transformation, mechanical property and shape memory effect of Ni₅₄Mn₂₅Ga_17.5Ta_0.5 alloy has been systematically investigated. The results show that the substructure of Ni-Mn-Ga alloy significantly changed, which was converted from the plate martensite to the lath martensite. Compression tests show that a compressive strength of 1380 MPa with a fracture strain up to 21.92% can be achieved in the Ni₅₄Mn₂₅Ga_17.5Ta_0.5 alloy at room temperature. This is no changed martensite structure with non-modulated T martensite. In addition, the martensitic transition temperature obviously decreases from 350 °C to 208 °Cand hysteresis loop increases about 20 °Cwhen Ta substituted of Ni. The shape memory effect increased with the increase of pre-deformation, nevertheless, the shape recovery ratio appeared firstly increases and then decreases. When the pre-deformation is 10%, 15%, 20%, the shape memory effect of the alloy is 5.1%, 6.8% and 10%, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Material Science and Engineering: Properties and Technologies

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 837)

Pages:

35-40

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.837.35

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2020

Authors:

Shun Yao Hui, Chao Ran Li, Tong Wang, Jing Wei Xie, Gui Fu Dong*

Keywords:

Mechanical Properties, Phase Transformation, Shape Memory Effect, Ta-Alloying

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] K. Ullakko, J.K. Huang, C. Kantner, R.C. O'Handley, and V.V. Kokorin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 (1996), p.(1966).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Tellinen, T. Suorsa, A. Jaaskelainen, I. Aalito, K. Ullakko, in: M.Bremen (Ed.), Basic Properties of Magnetic Shape Memory Actuators, Actuator 2002, Bremen, Germany, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] O. Heczko, A. Sozinov, K. Ullakko. IEEE Trans Mag. 36 (2000), p.3266.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Sozinov, A.A. Likhachev, Lanska N, Ullakko K. Appl Phys Lett. 80 (2002), p.1746.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Sozinov, A.A. Likhachev, N. Lanska, K. Ullakko, V.K. Lindroos. J Phys IV.112 (2003), p.955.

DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20031039

Google Scholar

[6] V.A. Chernenko, E. Cesari, V.V. Kokorin, I.N. Vitenko. Scripta Metall. Mater. 33 (1995), p.1239.

Google Scholar

[7] H.B Xu, Y.Q. Ma, C.B. Jiang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 (2003), p.3206.

Google Scholar

[8] V.A. Chernenko, V. L'vov, J. Pons, E. Cesari, J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003), p.2394.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Xin, Y. Li, L. Chai, H. Xu, Scripta Mater. 54 (2006), p.1139.

Google Scholar

[10] Y.Q. Ma, C.B. Jiang, Y. Li, H. B. Xu, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, Acta Mater. 55 (2007), p.1533.

Google Scholar

[11] H.B. Xu, Mater. Sci. Forum 394–395 (2002), p.375.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.N. Koval, Mater. Sci. Forum 327–328 (2000), p.271.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Van Humbeeck, Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 12 (1999), p.98.

Google Scholar

[14] G.S. Firstov, J. Van Humbeeck, Y.N. Koval, Scripta Mater. 50 (2004), p.243.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Yan, B. Yang, Y.D. Zhang, Z.B. Li, C. Esling, X. Zhao, L. Zuo, Acta Mater. 111 (2016), p.75e84.

Google Scholar

[16] R. Chulist, W. Skrotzki, C.G. Oertel, A. Bohm, M. Potschke, Scripta Mater. 63 (2010), p. 548e551.

Google Scholar

[17] K. Bhattacharya, R.V. Kohn, Acta Mater. 44 (1996), p. 529e542.

Google Scholar