Compressive Strength of Dental E-Glass Microfiber-Reinforced Composite Resin in Mouthwash Immersion

Abstract:

Fiber-reinforced composite resin (FRC) is gaining popularity as dental filling material. In the oral cavity, it will contact with the oral environment including oral cleansing agents. This research was aimed to determine the effect of mouthwash on the compressive strength of FRC. The materials used were E-glass FRC (EverX Posterior, GC Corp, Japan), alcohol mouthwash (Original Listerine, Johnson&Johnson, Indonesia), alcohol-free mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint Zero, Johnson&Johnson, Indonesia). Forty-five FRCs were made in cylindrical shapes. Specimens were divided into 2 groups of mouthwash immersion: alcohol and alcohol-free mouthwash. The groups were sub-grouped by 0, 6, 12, and 24 h immersion. Samples were recorded for compressive strength by Universal Testing Machine. The data were analyzed by ANOVA. The result of compressive strength values (MPa) were (alcohol mouthwash): 293.59±30.54 (0 h), 284.43±46.91 (6 h), 268.71±44.66 (12 h), 252.19±31.49 (24 h); (alcohol-free mouthwash): 294.12±28.17 (0 h), 287.30±35.56 (6 h), 273.32±41.94 (12 h), 260.82±40.67 (24 h). Statistical analysis revealed there was no significant influence of mouthwash type (alcohol or alcohol-free mouthwash), immersion duration (0, 6, 12, 24 h), and combination of mouthwash type and immersion duration (p>0.05) to the compressive strength of FRCs. The conclusions were the mouthwash types, immersion duration, and combination of mouthwash type and immersion duration did not influence the compressive strength of E-glass FRC

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 840)
• Pages: 300-304
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.840.300
• Online since: April 2020
• Authors: Siti Sunarintyas*, Rifqi Fahmi Affandi, Widjijono Widjijono
• Keywords: Compressive Strength, E-Glass Microfiber-Reinforced Composite, Mouthwash

References

[1] K. Anusavice, C. Shen, H. R. Rawls, Phillips Science of Dental Materials, 12th ed., Elsevier Pub., St. Louis, (2013).

[2] J. Bijelic-Donova, S. Garoushi, P. K. Vallittu, L. V. Lassila, Mechanical properties, fracture resistance, and fatigue limits of short fiber reinforced dental composite resin, J. Prosthet. Dent. 115 (2016) 95-102.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.012

[3] R. V. Noort, Introduction to Dental Materials, fourth ed., Mosby Ltd., Edinburgh, (2013).

[4] R. Sakaguchi, J. Ferracane, J. Powers, Craig's Restorative Dental Materials, 14th ed., Mosby Ltd., Philadel-phia, (2018).

[5] D.A. Miranda, C.E. Bertoldo, F.H. Aguiar, D.A. Lima, J.R. Lovadino, Effect of mouthwashes on Knoop hardness and surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion time, Braz. Oral Res. 25 (2011) 168-173.

DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242011000200012

[6] I. C. de Moraes Porto, L.E. das Neves, C.K. de Souza, A. Parolia, N.B. dos Santos, A comparative effect of mouthwashes with different alcohol concentrations on surface hardness, sorption and solubility of composites resins, Oral Health Dent. Manag. 13 (2014) 502-506.

[7] R. Koshhar, R. Dewan, S. Soi, M. Punjabi, An evaluation and comparison of the effect of five mouthrinses on the microhardness of esthetic hybrid composite restorative-material -an in vitro study, J. Dent. Specialities 5 (2017) 66-69.

[8] L. Wang, P.H.P. D'Alpino, L.G. Lopes, J.C. Pereira, Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests, J. Appl. Oral Sci. 11 (2003) 162-167.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572003000300002

[9] M. Moezzyzadeh, Evaluation of the compressive strength of hybrid and nanocomposites, J. Dent. Sch. 1 (2012) 24-29.

[10] S. Balagopal, R. Arjunkumar, Chlorhexidine: the gold standard antiplaque agent. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 5 (2013) 270-274.

[11] K. Jafari, S. Hekmatfar, S. Badakhsh, The effect of mouthwashes on surface hardness of dental ceramics, J. Dent. Biomater. 1 (2014) 23-26.

[12] B. W. Darvell, Materials Science for Dentistry, tenth ed., Woodhead Publishing in Materials, Cambridge, (2018).

[13] G. Rosamma, G. Kavyashree, Effect of four mouth rinses on microhardness of esthetic restorative material: an in vitro study, J. Int. Oral Health 9 (2017) 55-59.

DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_21_16

[14] R.A.A. Fernandez, M. El Araby, M. Siblini, A. Al-Shehri, The effect of different types of oral mouth rinses on the hardness of silorane-based and nano-hybrid composites, Saudi J. Oral Sci. 1 (2014) 105-109.

DOI: 10.4103/1658-6816.138481

[15] S.H. Tabatabaci, A. Sabaghi, The effect of three mouthwashes on micro leakage of a composite resin-an in vitro study, J. Am. Sci. 9 (2013) 13-19.

[16] A.A. Khan, A.Z. Siddiqui, S.F. Mohsin, A.A. Al-Kheraif, Influence of mouth rinses on the surface hardness of dental resin nano-composites, Pak. J. Med. Sci. 6 (2015) 1485-1489.

[17] M. Zhang, J.P. Matinlinna, E-glass fiber reinforced composites in dental applications, Silicon 4 (2012) 73-78.

DOI: 10.1007/s12633-011-9075-x

[18] L.O.L. Bohner, A.P.T. de Godoi, A.S. Ahmed, P.T. Neto, A.B.C.E.B. Catirse, Surface roughness of restorative materials after immersion in mouthwashes, Eur. J. Gen. Dent. 5 (2016) 111-114.

DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.189255