The Porosity and Human Gingival Cells Attachment of Synthetic Coral Scaffold for Bone Regeneration

Article Preview

Abstract:

Porosity and interconnectivity play an important role in the success of tissue engineering because it affects cells to live and grow. Coral has been used as a bone replacement material because the structures resemble bone and have mechanical bone properties. In this study, the synthetic coral scaffold was developed to mimic the natural coral. This study aims to investigate the porosity of the scaffold and its biocompatibility while it is attached to human gingival cells. Synthetic coral scaffold in various compositions were prepared, porosity percentage measurement and human gingival cell attachment test were done. An optimum ratio of the scaffold with gelatin: CaCO3, having the highest porosity and cell attachment is obtained in 5:5. The result of this study presented that synthetic coral scaffold could provide the microenvironment to cells for life because it is supported by the highest percentage of porosity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

305-310

Citation:

Online since:

April 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. J. O'Brien, Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering, Mater. Today 14 (2011) 88-95.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Tabata, Tissue Regeneration Based on Drug Delivery Technology, Topics in Tissue Engineering, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] W. Wattanutchariya, W. Changkowchai, Characterization of porous scaffold from chitosan-gelatin/hydroxyapatite for bone grafting, Proceedings of IMECS 2 (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] K. A. Blackwood, N. Bock, T. R. Dargaville, M. A. Woodruff, Scaffolds for growth factor delivery as applied to bone tissue engineering, Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2012 (2012) 1-25.

DOI: 10.1155/2012/174942

Google Scholar

[5] H. Tai, M.L. Mather, D. Howard, W. Wang, L.J. White, J.A. Crowe, S.P. Morgan, A. Chandra, D.J. Williams, S.M. Howdle, K.M. Shakesheff, Control of pore size and structure of tissue engineering scaffolds produced by supercritical fluid processing, Eur. Cell. Mater. 14 (2007) 64-77.

DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v014a07

Google Scholar

[6] J.E. Davies, R. Matta, V.C. Mendes, P.S.P. de Carvalho, Development, characterization and clinical use of a biodegradable composite scaffold for bone engineering in oro-maxillo-facial surgery, Organogenesis 6 (2010) 161-166.

DOI: 10.4161/org.6.3.12392

Google Scholar

[7] A. J. Salgado, O.P. Coutinho, R.L. Reis, Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends, Macromol. Biosci. 4 (2004) 743-765.

DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200400026

Google Scholar

[8] K.A. Al-Salihi, In vitro evaluation of Malaysian natural coral porites bone graft subtitutes (CORAGRAF) for bone tissue engineering: a preliminary study, Braz. J. Oral Sci. 8 (2009) 210-216.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Hou, F. Chen, Y. Yang, X. Cheng, Z. Gao, H.O. Yang, W. Wu, T. Mao, Comparative study between coral-mesenchymal stem cells rhBMP-2 composite and auto-bone-graft in rabbit critical-sized cranial defect model, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 80A (2007) 85-93.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30840

Google Scholar

[10] A.M. Parizi, A. Oryan, Z.S. Sarvestani, A.B. Sadegh, Effectiveness of synthetic hydroxyapatite versus parsian gulf coral in an animal model of long bone defect reconstruction, J. Orthop. Traumatol. 14 (2013) 259-268.

DOI: 10.1007/s10195-013-0261-z

Google Scholar

[11] J. Ratanavaraporn, S. Damrongsakkul, N. Sanchavanakit, T. Banaprasert, S. Kanokpanont, Comparison of gelatin and collagen scaffold for fibroblast cell culture, Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals 16 (2006) 31-36.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Young, M. Wong, Y. Tabata, A.G. Mikos, Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release bioactive molecule, J. Control Release 109 (2005) 256-274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.023

Google Scholar

[13] A.A. Karem, R. Bhat, Fish gelatin: properties, challenges and prospects as an alternative to mammalian gelatins, Food Hydrocoll. 23 (2009) 563-576.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.07.002

Google Scholar

[14] V. Patel, S.K. Dwivedi, A review: polarity of molecules, IJPRS 2 (2013) 549-561.

Google Scholar

[15] K. Pal, A.K. Banthia, D.K. Majumdar, Polymeric hydrogels: characterization and biomedical applications, a mini review, Des. Monomers Polym. 12 (2009) 197-220.

DOI: 10.1163/156855509x436030

Google Scholar

[16] E.S. Mahanani, I. Bachtiar, I.D. Ana, Human mesenchymal stem cells behavior on synthetic coral scaffold, Key Eng. Mater. 696 (2016) 205-211.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.696.205

Google Scholar

[17] S.C. Leeuwenburgh, I.D. Ana, J.A. Jansen, Sodium citrate as an effective dispersant for synthesis of inorganic-organic composites with nanodispersed mineral phase, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 836-844.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.005

Google Scholar

[18] A.B. Hassan, Human bone tissue engineering using coral and differentiated osteoblasts from derived-mesenchymal stem cells, thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, (2008).

Google Scholar

[19] K.C.S. Figueiredo, T.L.M. Alves, C.P. Borges, Poly(vinyl alcohol) films crosslinked by glutaraldehyde under mild conditions, J. Appl. Polym Sci. 111 (2009) 3074-3080.

DOI: 10.1002/app.29263

Google Scholar

[20] C.M. Murphy, M.G. Haugh, F.J. O'Brien, The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for tissue engineering, Biomaterials 31 (2010) 461-466.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063

Google Scholar

[21] V. Karageorgiou, D. Kaplan, Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 5474-5491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002

Google Scholar

[22] E.G. Khaled, M. Saleh, S. Hindocha, M. Griffin, W.S. Khan, Tissue engineering for bone production-stem cells, gene therapy and scaffolds, Open Orthop. J. 5 (2011) 289-295.

DOI: 10.2174/1874325001105010289

Google Scholar

[23] H.G. Kang, S.Y. Kim, Y.M. Lee, Novel porous gelatin scaffolds by overrun/particle leaching process for tissue engineering applications, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 79 (2006) 388-397.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30553

Google Scholar

[24] C.E. Holy, M.S. Shoichet, J.E. Davies, Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 (2000) 376-382.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<376::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-g

Google Scholar

[25] L. Olah, L. Borbas, Properties of calcium carbonate-containing composite scaffolds, Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 10 (2008) 61-66.

Google Scholar

[26] V.V. Gaikwad, A.B. Patil, M. V. Gaikwad, Scaffold for drug delivery in tissue engineering, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology 1 (2008) 113-122.

DOI: 10.37285/ijpsn.2008.1.2.1

Google Scholar

[27] T. Garg, O. Singh, S. Arora, R.S.R. Murthy, Scaffold: a novel carrier for cell and drug delivery, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug. Carrier Syst. 29 (2012) 1-63.

DOI: 10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v29.i1.10

Google Scholar

[28] H.H. Nitzsche, Development and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite-collagen-chitosan scaffolds for bone regeneration, dissertation, Martin Luther Universität, (2010).

Google Scholar