Surface Roughness Prediction Based on Acoustic Emission Signals in High-Precision Diamond Turning of Rapidly Solidified Optical Aluminum Grade (RSA443)

Abstract:

Acoustic emission signal-based prediction of surface roughness has been utilized widely, yet little work has been done in this regard on RSA443. This paper seeks to study the correlation between acoustic emission (AE) signal parameters and surface roughness. Estimation of surface roughness using AE signal parameters and subsequent examination of the influence of AE signal parameters (root mean square, peak rate and prominent frequency) on the accuracy of the RSM model in surface roughness prediction are carried out. The experiment is designed using the Taguchi L9 orthogonal array to minimize the number of experiments. Emitted acoustic signals are captured using a Piezotron sensor. Three RSM models are formulated and compared in this study: a model that uses only critical machining parameters (cutting speed, depth of cut and feed rate), a model that uses only AE signal parameters (root mean square, peak rate and prominent frequency) and a model that uses both critical machining parameters and AE signal parameters. An assessment based on the models’ mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is made to see if AE signal parameters have any contribution towards surface roughness prediction accuracy. The order of parameter significance in the most accurate model is investigated in this paper. The mean absolute percentage error results for the models indicate that the model in which AE signal parameters are utilized in conjunction with critical machining parameters has the highest prediction accuracy of 97.32%. The model that utilizes only critical machining parameters has a prediction accuracy of 96.35% while the one that utilizes only AE signal parameters has a prediction accuracy of 84.43%. It is observed that the order of parameter significance from the most to the least significant is as follows: feed rate, cutting speed, peak rate, AErms, depth of cut and prominent frequency.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 841)
• Pages: 363-368
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.841.363
• Online since: May 2020
• Authors: Zvikomborero Hweju*, Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
• Keywords: Acoustic Emission Signals, Analysis of Variance, Monocrystalline Diamond Tools, Response Surface Methodology, Single-Point Diamond Turning, Surface Integrity

References

[1] S. F. Krar, J. W. Oswald, Technology of machine tools vol. Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, (1990).

[2] Z. A. Mkoko, K. Abou-El-Hossein, Effects of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness when Ultra-High Precision Diamond Turning RSA443 Optical Aluminum, Solid State Phenomena, 287 (2019) 30-34.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.287.30

[3] D. M. S. Lou, D. J. C. Chen, D. C. M. Li, Surface Roughness Prediction Technique For CNC End-Milling, J. Industrial Technol. 15 (1998) 1-6.

[4] B. A. Beatrice, E. Kirubakaran, P. R. J. Thangaiah, K. L. D. Winsd, Surface Roughness Prediction using Artificial Neural Network inHard Turning of AISI H13 Steel with Minimal Cutting Fluid Application, Procedia Eng. 97 (2014) 205-211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.243

[5] L. Y. Zhang, Y. H. Jiang, Z. Maa, S. F. Shanc, Y. Z. Jiab, C. Z. Fanc, et al. Effect of cooling rate on solidified microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium-A356 alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 207 (2008) 107-111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.059

[6] L. Katgerman, F. Dom, Rapidly Solidified Aluminium Alloys by Meltspinning, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1 (2004) 375-377.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.094

[7] E. Kuram, B. Ozceik, E. Demirbas, Effects of the Cutting Fluid Types and Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness and Thrust Force, World Congress Eng. (WCE), 2 (2010).

[8] M. Soković, K. Mijanović, Ecological aspects of cutting fluids and its influence on quantifiable parameters of the cutting processes, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 109 (2001) 181-189.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00794-9