Research on Treatment of Retaining Wall Foundation with Geosynthetics Based on BP Neural Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

Through the long-term load creep test of CE131 geonet and SD L25 retaining wall foundation, which are widely used in reinforced earth engineering, a large number of experimental data are obtained. On this basis, the least-squares and BP neural network are used to predict its creep variables. The principle of least squares is to find a curve in the curve family to fit the experimental data. From the sum of the squared errors σ = 0. 001 16, the fitting accuracy is higher. The BP neural network has adaptive learning and memory capabilities, especially the three-layer BP neural network model. The maximum error between the predicted value and the actual value is 0.91%, which is a lot better than the error of the least square 3.4%. This method Found a new way for creep prediction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

220-229

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X.-H. Zeng, & Z.-D. Liu. Research on pattern of female trouser based on bp neural network. Journal of Beijing Institute of Clothing Technology (Natural Science Edition) 38(4) (2018) 45-51.

Google Scholar

[2] Peng, X., Yang, K., & Yuan, X. A novel pressure sensor calibration system based on a neural networkproject supported by the national natural science foundation of china (no. 61275081) , 36(9) (2015) 121-124.

Google Scholar

[3] Vinay Kumar Chandaluri, V. A. Sawant, & S. K. Shukla. Seismic stability analysis of reinforced soil wall using horizontal slice method. International Journal of Geosynthetics & Ground Engineering, 1(3) (2015)1-10.

DOI: 10.1007/s40891-015-0025-3

Google Scholar

[4] L.-F. Zheng, Y.-L. Dong, Y.-S. Han, J. Zhang, & T. Wang. Optimal design of geosynthetics-reinforced wall based on sequential quadratic programming method. Journal of North University of China, 39(3) (2018) 289-296.

Google Scholar

[5] X.-G. Cai, S.-H. Li, & X. Huang. Geogrid strain and failure surface of two-stage reinforced soil retaining wall under horizontal seismic loading. Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 40(8) (2018) 1528-1534.

DOI: 10.1155/2020/8864256

Google Scholar

[6] L. Zhu, S. Liu, Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, & W. Liu. Design of corona radiation monitoring system based on virtual instrument technology and neural network. High Voltage Engineering, 41(1) (2015) 333-338.

Google Scholar

[7] TOMASZ PASIK, MAREK CHALECKI, & EUGENIUSZ KODA. Analysis of embedded retaining wall using the subgrade reaction method. Studia Geotechnica Et Mechanica, 37(1) (2015) 59-73.

DOI: 10.1515/sgem-2015-0008

Google Scholar

[8] Juan-Carlos Quezada, Eric Vincens, Rémy Mouterde, & Jean-Claude Morel. 3d failure of a scale-down dry stone retaining wall: a dem modelling. Engineering Structures, 117 (2016) 506-517.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.020

Google Scholar