Viscoelastic Resistance of the Surface Layer of Steel Products to Shock Attack of a Spherical Pellet

Abstract:

The results of experimental studies of a separate contact dynamic interaction of a spherical non-deformable pellet with a plastic flat metal surface at different angles of attack (20° ≤ α ≤ 90°) at high speeds (v ≈ 100m/s) are presented. A method is described for determining the nature of the viscoelastic resistance of a surface layer attacked by a pellet during contact displacement along the normal to the surface and rigid plastic resistance during tangential displacement, which can be used to establish the processing regimes of products by a mass flow of abrasive particles, in particular, shot-blasting cleaning. The results of comparing the obtained and known theoretical data with each other and with experimental studies are presented.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 864)
• Pages: 217-227
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.864.217
• Online since: September 2020
• Authors: Oleksii Goryk*, Stanislav Koval’chuk, Oleksandr Brykun, Roman Chernyak
• Keywords: Angle of Attack, Attacking Pellet, Dynamic Hardness, Resistance, Speed, Surface Layer Deformation, Trace Parameters, Viscoelastic

References

[1] M. S. Drozd, M. M. Matlin, Yu. I. Sidyakin, Inzhenernyie raschetyi uprugoplasticheskoy kontaktnoy deformatsii, Mashinostroenie, Moskva, (1986).

[2] J G. A. Bitter, A study of erosion phenomena, Wear. 1 (1963) 5-21.

[3] A. V. Gorik, S. B. Kovalchuk, G. A. Shulyanskiy, Opredelenie uprugoplasticheskogo koeffitsienta udarnogo vzaimodeystviya sfericheskogo indentora s deformiruemyim poluprostranstvom, Vostochno-evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovyih tehnologiy. 1/7(61) (2013) 56-59.

[4] Yu. I. Abramov, Soudarenie tverdyih chastits pyili s pregradoy iz uprugoplasticheskogo materiala , Trenie i iznos. 8(1) (1987) 83-94.

[5] K. Dzhonson, Mehanika kontaktnogo vzaimodeystviya, Mir, Moskva, (1989).

[6] J. S. Chen, D. A. Desai, S. P.Heyns, F. Pietra, Literature review of numerical simulation and optimisation of the shot peening process, Advances in echanical Engineering. 11(3) (2019) 1-19.

DOI: 10.1177/1687814018818277

[7] A. E. Martyanova, Model udarnogo kontakta tverdoy abrazivnoy chastitsyi s plastichnyim materialom, Vestnik Astrahanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 1 (2004) 77-81.

[8] N. V. Koteneva, Uprugoplasticheskiy kontakt gladkoy sferyi s ploskoy poverhnostyu pri dinamicheskom nagruzhenii, Izvestiya Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. 308 (2) (2005) 114-116.

[9] M. Frija, T. Hassine, R. Fathallah, C. Bouraoui, A. Dogui, Finite element modelling of shot peening process: Prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plastic deformations and the surface integrity, Materials Science and Engineering. A 426 (2006) 173-180.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.097

[10] B. V. Lupkin, N. S. Pogrebelnyiy, Uprochnyayuschaya obrabotka poverhnostnyim plasticheskim deformirovaniem, Otkryityie informatsionnyie i kompyuternyie integrirovannyie tehnologii. 58 (2013) 40-48.

[11] A. N. Bolotov, V. V. Meshkov, O. V. Sutyagin, M. V. Vasilev, Vliyanie uprochneniya na harakteristiki uprugoplasticheskogo kontakta mikronerovnostey poverhnostey, Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 4(2) (2013) 313-315.

[12] O. Goryk, O. Brykun, R. Chernyak, Choice of optimum parameters of technology of shot blasting of internal surfaces of oversize elements of motor-car technique, Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. 1-2 (2016) 72-77.

[13] Z. Li, F. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Gao, Numerical Simulation of Derusting Treatment of Steel Parts By Shot Blast, CMES. 120 (1) (2019) 157-175.

DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2019.05187

[14] A. V. Gorik, A. P. Zinkovskii, R. E. Chernyak, A. N. Brikun, Elastoplastic Deformation of the Surface Layer of Machinery Constructions on Shot Blasting, Strength of Materials. 48(5) (2016) 650-657.

DOI: 10.1007/s11223-016-9808-6

[15] E. M. Morozov, M. V. Zernin, Kontaktnyie zadachi mehaniki razrusheniya, Mashinostroenie, Moskva, (1999).

[16] B. Arifvianto, M. Mahardika, U. A. Salim, Comparison of Surface Characteristics of Medical-grade 316L Stainless Steel Processed by Sand-blasting, Slag Ball-blasting and Shot-blasting Treatments, J. Eng. Technol. 52(1) (2020) 1-13.

DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2020.52.1.1

[17] Yu. P. Zemskov, L. I. Nazina, Optimization of technological modes of shot-streaming before repairing of details of food machines by plasma spraying, Technologies for the Food and Processing Industry of AIC. 2 (2016) 71-76.

[18] M. M. Matlin i dr., Opredelenie ratsionalnyih tehnologicheskih rezhimov uprochnyayuschey drobeobrabotki stalnyih detaley, Izvestiya VolgGTU. 9 (136) (2014) 99-102.

[19] K. Komvopulos, Konechno-elementnoe reshenie kontaktnoy zadachi dlya uprugoplasticheskogo sloistogo poluprostranstva, Sovremennoe mashinostroenie. 2 (1990) 165-176.

[20] R. F. Kubler, S. Berveiller, D. Bouscaud, R. Guiheux, E. Patoor, Q. Puydt, Shot peening of TRIP780 steel: experimental analysis and numerical simulation, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 270 (2019) 182-194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.02.031

[21] F. V. Novikov, O. O. Andilakhai, Osnovy strumynno-abrazyvnoi obrobky dribnykh detalei: monohrafiia, Vyd. KhNEU im. S. Kuznetsia, Kharkiv, (2014).

[22] I. R. Kleys, H. G. Uumyiys, Iznosostoykost elementov izmelchiteley udarnogo deystviya, Mashinostroenie, Moskva, (1986).

[23] V. N. Vinogradov, G. M. Sorokin, A. Yu. Albagachiev, Iznashivanie pri udare, Mashinostroenie, Moskva, (1982).

[24] Ya. H. Panovko, Vvedenie v teoriyu mehanicheskogo udara, Nauka, Moskva, (1977).