Effect of Modified Silica Fume and Cellulose Fiber Used as Fillers on Properties of Antivibration Rubber

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of modified silica fume (mSF) and cellulose fiber (CF) content on the cure characteristics, mooney viscosity, mechanical, durability and heat resistance properties are investigated; as compared with SF and unfilled natural rubber. From the results reveal that mSF and CF affect not only fast cure rate, high viscosity but also improve rubber mechanical and heat resistance properties. Additionally, the mSF and CF are added into the natural rubber to produce antivibration rubber product and then study the rubber product performance such as durability properties. The mSF and CF effective in improving the crack resistance of antivibration rubber product more than SF and unfilled natural rubber which is due to enhancing the stiffness. The all obtained results, it can be proved that mSF and CF as the new alternative fillers in rubber industry.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

34-39

Citation:

Online since:

February 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E.M. Dannenberg: Rubber Chem Technol Vol. 55 (1982), p.860.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Maslowski, J. Miedzianowska and K. Strzelec: Polymer Vol. 11 (2019), p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] K.L. Pickering, M.G.A. Efendy and T.M. Le: Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf Vol. 83 (2016), p.98.

Google Scholar

[4] H.H. Redhwi, M.N. Siddiqui, A.L. Andrady, A.L. and H. Syed: Polym Compos Vol. 34 (2013), p.1878.

Google Scholar

[5] O. Faruk, A.K. Bledzki, H.P. Fink and M. Sain: Prog Polym Sci Vol. 37 (2012), p.1552.

Google Scholar

[6] B.V. Ramnath, V.M. Manickavasagam, C. Elanchezhian, C.V. Krishna, S. Karthik and K. Saravanan : Mater Des Vol. 60 (2014), p.643.

Google Scholar

[7] M.K. Gupta and R.K. Srivastava: Polym-Plast Technol Eng Vol. 55 (2016), p.626.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Deng, D. Paraskevas, Y. Tian, K. Acker, W. Dewulg and J.R. Duflou: J Clean Prod Vol. 33 (2016), p.427.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Ismail and F.L. Chung: Int J Polym Mater Vol. 43 (1999), p.301.

Google Scholar

[10] V.R. Vijay, A.M. Anitha and A.R.R. Menon: Polymer Vol. 89 (2016), p.135.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Chen, Z. Jia, Y. Tang, L. Wu, Y. Luo and D. Jia: Compos Sci Technol Vol. 144 (2017), p.11.

Google Scholar

[12] C.S.J. Chandra, P.K. Bipinbal and K.N. Sunil: Polym Test Vol. 60 (2017), p.187.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Yin, Q. Zhang, J. Gu, Z. Zhao, J. Zheng, G. Gong, T. Liang and H. Zhang: Polym-Plast Technol Vol. 51 (2012), p.1218.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Ismail and R. Nordin: Polym-Plast Technol Vol. 43 (2004), p.285.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Suntako: Mater Lett Vol. 158 (2015), p.399.

Google Scholar

[16] Z.Q. Zeng, H.C. Liu and H.P. Yu: Mater Res Innov Vol. 17, p.251.

Google Scholar