Comparison of Hardness and Microstructure of Cast Wheel and Spoke Wheel Rims of Motorcycles Made of Aluminum Alloy Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The rim is one of the main components in a motorized vehicle system, both two and three wheels. Rim loads when used are dynamic and often even shock. This study aims to study the mechanical characteristics, especially the hardness properties of spoke wheel rims and cast wheel rims made of aluminum alloy used in motorcycles and compare the results. Hardness testing is carried out on the spoke wheel and cast wheel specimens, using the Rockwell method with an identifier of 1/16 ball and a spectrometer used for both microstructure observations. The result of the average hardness test for the spoke wheel is HRB 99.3, while for the cast wheel is HRB 76.5. From the hardness test, it can be concluded that the hardness of the spoke wheel type is higher than the cast wheel type due to the difference in the manufacturing process. Cast wheel rims can withstand a load of 3 tons (30000 N) and the value of rim tension that can be accepted until the fracture is 45.84 MPa. Meanwhile, spoke wheel rims have the ability to withstand smaller compressive loads than cast wheel rims, which are 2 tonnes (20000 N) and the rims can accept the stress of 66.04 MPa until they break.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

81-88

Citation:

Online since:

July 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ningtyas A, and Lubi J, Jurusan Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknologi Industri, (in: Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya). (2013).

DOI: 10.30596/rmme.v2i1.3067

Google Scholar

[2] Husaini, K KISHIMOTO, M HANJI, M NOTOMI, Investigations of the mixed mode crack growth behavior of an aluminum alloy, ARPN J.of Eng. and Appl. Sci. 11 (2016) 885-890.

Google Scholar

[3] Husaini, Nurdin Ali, Agustian B, Analysis on The Surface of Broken Screw Spring Front Car Suspension (in Indonesian), Seminar Nasional Teknologi Rekayasa (SNTR-3) (2016) 111-117.

Google Scholar

[4] Husaini, Zuhaimi, Mixed Mode Fracture Behavior of An Aluminum Alloy A6061 Investigated By Using Compact Tension Shear Specimens, Int. J. of Techn. 7 (2016) 456-462.

DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v7i3.1924

Google Scholar

[5] Husaini, N Ali, R Riantoni, TE Putra, H Husin, Study of leaf spring fracture behavior used in the suspension systems in the diesel truck vehicles, IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. and Eng. 541 (2019) 012046.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/541/1/012046

Google Scholar

[6] Suharto D, Husaini, Siswosuwarno M, Proc. of The First Austral. Cong. Appl. Mech.: ACAM-96 Barton Australia. 1 (1996) 227-232.

Google Scholar

[7] Husaini, Ali N, Putra TE, Armia F, Akhyar, Study on Fracture Failures of the Super Heater Water Pipe Boiler, Def. and Diff. Forum 402 (2020) 20-26.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.402.20

Google Scholar

[8] Husaini, Putra T E, Novriandika S, Study of Failure Analysis of a Fracture Crankshaft Pulley Used on a Truck Engine, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 739 (2020) 012018.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/739/1/012018

Google Scholar

[9] Josip Brnic, Goran Turkalj, Domagoj Lanc, Marko Canadija, Marino Brcic, Goran Vukelic, Comparison of material properties: Steel 20MnCr5 and similar steels, J.l of Constr. Steel Res. 95 (2014) 81-89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.11.024

Google Scholar

[10] Putra T E, Husaini, Ikbal M, Hasanuddin I, Rizal M, Machmud M N, Fatigue Life Assessments of the AISI 1513 Carbon Steel Subjected to Road Surface Strains, Def. and Diff. Forum 402 (2020) 39-44.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.402.39

Google Scholar

[11] Putra T E, Husaini, Prakasa H, Prediction of the Fatigue Life of the SAE 5160 Carbon Steel Coil Spring Based on Strain-Life Approach, Key Eng. Mat. 841 (2020) 381-386.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.841.381

Google Scholar

[12] Tahu F, Limbong U K E, Jurusan Teknik Mesin,(Indonesai: Universitas Nusa Cendana). (2015).

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM E18–15, Stand. Test Meth. Rockw. Hard. Met. Materials (USA: ASTM International). (2015).

Google Scholar

[14] Husaini, Putra T E, Rizky M R, Akmal R, Hasanuddin I, Rizal M, Ali N, Fatigue Life Assessments of the AISI 1513 Carbon Steel of a Vehicle Lower Arm Subjected to Clockwise and Counter-Clockwise Road Strains, Def. and Diff. Forum 402 (2020) 45-49.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.402.45

Google Scholar

[15] Putra T E, Husaini, Machmud M N, Predicting the fatigue life of an automotive coil spring considering road surface roughness, Eng. Fail. Aanaly. 116 (2020) 104722.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104722

Google Scholar

[16] Andoko A, Harjanto B, Estriyanto Y, Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik dan Kejuruan (in: Indonesia: Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta). (2013).

DOI: 10.20961/jiptek.v10i2.16922

Google Scholar