Provisions of Sustainability in Structural Design Approaches in Different Codes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete has changed the norms in the Construction industry, it has modified the thinking and possibilities of the general public. Particularly, Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) is being used throughout the world; whether it be tall sky scrapers in the Middle East, or the vast buildings in Central Europe, RCC has altered the construction Industry. But then again, RCC has its fair share of shortcomings, in recent times it has been recorded that RCC structures collapse due to brittle failure. Seismic loading, mainly from earthquakes are mostly responsible for structure failure as seismic waves generally lead towards overloading and ultimately the structure fails. Cement is generally an energy releasing material and it releases immense amount of CO2 emissions into the earth’s atmosphere, causing the ozone layer to deplete. Hence to minimize this impact and to provide a sustainable solution and to minimize the accidents different sustainable houses are being provided to the people. By doing this, we can reuse existing building assets to minimize the waste and to reduce the pollution. In 2011, International Organization launched the Life cycle Sustainability assessment to have a more sustainable approach towards construction by using different techniques. Life cycle sustainability assessment is a suitable too used for environmental performance of buildings. In this paper we will look to observe different provisions of sustainability in different structural designs taking different codes as a reference.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

149-155

Citation:

Online since:

August 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Michael D. Kotsovos, Angeliki Baka, and Emanuel Vougioukas (2015). Earthquake-Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures: Shortcomings of Current Methods.

Google Scholar

[2] Olufolahan Oduyemi, Michael Okoroh (2016). Building performance modelling for sustainable building design.

Google Scholar

[3] Michael D. Kotsovos (2017). Reinforced Concrete Shear Design: Shortcomings and Remedy.

Google Scholar

[4] J.T. Kevern, A.M. ASCE (2011). Green Building and Sustainable Infrastructure: Sustainability Education for Civil Engineers.

Google Scholar

[5] Antonio Marico Tavares Thome, Paula Santos Ceryno, Annibal Scavarda, Arne Remmen (2016). Sustainable infrastructure: A review and a research agenda.

Google Scholar

[6] Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, Daniel Jato-Espino, Badr Alsulami, Daniel Castro-Fresno (2016). Evaluation of existing sustainable infrastructure rating systems for their application in developing countries.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.033

Google Scholar

[7] Michael D. Kotsovos, Milija N. Pavlovic (2012). Shortcomings of code methods for shear design of RC structures and the possible role of fibres.

Google Scholar

[8] Tolga ÇELIK, Saeed KAMALI. Multidimensional Comparison of Lightweight Steel and Reinforced Concrete Structures: A Case Study.

Google Scholar

[9] Bakare, Haneef Akinsola (2018). An Investigation on Comparative Use of Light Gauge Steel Construction Over Concrete Works for Public Housing.

Google Scholar

[10] N.W. Alnaser, R. Flanagan (2005). The need of sustainable buildings construction in the Kingdom of Bahrain.

Google Scholar

[11] Yong Han Ahna, Annie R. Pearce, Yuhong Wang and George Wang (2012). Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience.

Google Scholar

[12] Anna Irene De Luca, Nathalie Iofrida, Pekka Leskinen, Teodora Stillitano, Giacomo Falcone, Alfio Strano, Giovanni Gulisano (2017). Life cycle tools combined with multi-criteria and participatory methods for agricultural sustainability: Insights from a systematic and critical review.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.284

Google Scholar

[13] Sasitharan Nagapan1, Ismail Abdul Rahman1, Ade Asmi2, Aftab Hameed Memon1, Imran Latif (2012). Issues on Construction Waste: The Need for Sustainable Waste Management.

Google Scholar

[14] Puja Rajhans, Gaurav Chand, Nishikant Kisku, Sarat Kumar Panda, Sanket Nayak (2019). Proposed mix design method for producing sustainable self-compacting heat cured recycled aggregate concrete and its microstructural investigation.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.149

Google Scholar

[15] Mijoh A. Gbededoa, Kapila Liyanagea and Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes (2018). Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis: A Systematic Review of Approaches to Sustainable Manufacturing.

Google Scholar

[16] Jos Arts, Charlotta Faith-E11 (2012). New governance approaches for Sustainable project delivery.

Google Scholar

[17] Michael D. Kotsovos (2016). Structural Concrete: Shortcomings of Current Design and Proposed Revision.

Google Scholar