How Efficient are LC3 and GGBFS-Contained Mortar Mixtures Submerged into Na₂SO₄ Solution against External Sulfate Attack at an early Age?

Abstract:

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering infrastructure construction but it is susceptible to sulfate attack. One of the ways to improve the sulfate resistance of an OPC mortar/concrete is to replace a certain amount of OPC with different pozzolanic materials such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and metakaolin. The use of pozzolanic materials to mortar/concrete not only enhances durability but also reduces carbon dioxide (CO₂) emission due to the less usage of OPC at the initial construction state. As considering these aspects, limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) has been developed in recent decades. However, the influence of LC3 on sulfate attack resistance has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this study investigated the efficiency of LC3 mortar mixtures against sulfate attack at an early age (approximately 4.5 months) after two different curing periods, namely 1-day and 3-day curing, since the strength of the LC3 mixture is lower than OPC mixtures. To evaluate the synergistic effect of a combination of LC3 and GGBFS on the sulfate resistance, the LC3 and OPC mixtures containing 25% GGBFS were also assessed in terms of density, porosity, compressive strength, volumetric expansion, and weight changes. The experiment results show that the expansion of the LC3 mixture regardless of the addition of GGBFS and an initial curing strength made a plateau after a rapid increase up to 7 days, while the expansion of the OPC mixture kept increasing throughout the period. Furthermore, the addition of GGBFS to OPC or LC3 mixture provides the synergistic effect on reducing the expansion due to sulfate attack. Therefore, if LC3 mixture has high initial strength (min. 15 MPa) and dense microstructure to minimize the penetration of sulfate ion into the mixture, it is expected that LC3 mixture is more efficient than OPC mixture against the sulfate attack.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 902)
• Pages: 145-151
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.902.145
• Online since: October 2021
• Authors: Islam Orynbassarov*, Chang Seon Shon, Jong Ryeol Kim, Umut Bektimirova, Aidyn Tugelbayev
• Keywords: Eco-Efficient Cement, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3), Sulfate Attack, Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCM)

References

[1] M. Robledo-Gutiérrez, M.T. Blanco-Varela, P.M. Carmona-Quiroga, Mineralogical Composition of Clinker as an Indicator of Sulfate Resistance: A Rietveld XRD/Takashima Approach, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 96 (11) (2013) 3637–3642.

DOI: 10.1111/jace.12575

[2] M. Whittaker, L. Black, Current knowledge of external sulfate attack, Adv. Cem. Res., 27 (9) (2015) 532-545.

[3] C.-S. Shon, Y.-S. Kim, Evaluation of West Texas natural zeolite as an alternative of ASTM Class F fly ash, Constr. Build. Mater., 47 (2013) 389–396.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.041

[4] X. Lv, Y. Dong, R. Wang, C. Lu, X. Wang, Resistance improvement of cement mortar containing silica fume to external sulfate attacks at normal temperature, Constr. Build. Mater., 258 (2020) 119630.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119630

[5] N.M. Al-Akhras, Durability of metakaolin concrete to sulfate attack, Cem. Concr. Res., 36 (9) (2006) 1727–1734.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.026

[6] S.-J. Kwon, Effect of mineral admixture on CO2 emissions and absorption in relation to service life and varying CO2 concentrations, Int. J. Sust. Build. Techn. Urb. Dev., 7 (3-4) (2016) 165–173.

[7] M. Antoni, J. Rossen, F. Martirena, K. Scrivener, Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone, Cem. Concr. Res., 42 (2012) 1579–1589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006

[8] K. Scrivenera, F. Martirena, S. Bishnoic, S.Maity, Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res., 114 (2018) 49–56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017

[9] K. Scrivener, F. Avet, H. Maraghechi, F. Zunino, J. Ston, W. Hanpongpun, A. Favier, Impacting factors and properties of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3), Green Mater, 7 (1) (2019) 3–14.

DOI: 10.1680/jgrma.18.00029

[10] Q.D. Nguyen, S. Afroz, A. Castel. Influence of calcined clay reactivity on the mechanical properties and chloride diffusion resistance of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) concrete, J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8 (2020) 301.

DOI: 10.3390/jmse8050301

[11] Y. Dhandapani, T. Sakthivel, M. Santhanam, R. Gettu, R.G. Pillai, Mechanical properties and durability performance of concretes with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res., 107 (2018) 136-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005

[12] Z. Shi, B. Lothenbach, M.R. Geiker, J. Kaufmann, A. Leemann, S. Ferreiro, J. Skibsted, Experimental studies and thermodynamic modeling of the carbonation of Portland cement, metakaolin and limestone mortars, Cem. Concr. Res. 88 (2016) 60–72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.06.006

[13] Z. Shi, S. Ferreiro, B. Lothenbach, M.R. Geiker, W. Kunther, J. Kaufmann, D. Herfort, J. Skibsted, Sulfate resistance of calcined clay–limestone–portland cements, Cem. Concr. Res.. 116 (2019) 238 –251.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.003

[14] ASTM C305-20, Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, www.astm.org.

DOI: 10.1520/c0305-13

[15] ASTM C109 / C109M-20b, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, www.astm.org.

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-13

[16] ASTM C1012 / C1012M-18b, Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulfate Solution, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org.

DOI: 10.1520/c1012-03

[17] W. Tian and N. Han, Experiment analysis of concrete's mechanical property deterioration suffered sulfate attack and drying-wetting cycles, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017 (2017) 5673985.

DOI: 10.1155/2017/5673985