The Effect of Area Loading and Punching Shear on the Reinforced Concrete Slab Containing Spherical Plastic Bubble Balls

Article Preview

Abstract:

The reinforced bubble deck slab or BubbleDeck is a unique system that improves the building design and performance of structures. This slab structure is a reinforced concrete structure that contains high-density polyethene (HDPE) hollow spherical plastic bubble balls with less concrete volume compared to a normal reinforced concrete slab. The system can facilitate up to a 50% longer span compared to a conventional reinforced concrete solid slab. But, eliminating the deadweight concrete may affect the actual performance of the slab structure such as its flexural and shear capacity. Thus, this paper investigates the effect of area loading and punching shear loading on the reinforced bubble deck slab in terms of flexural performance. The square slabs with 1200mm by 1200mm for width and length with a thickness of 230mm were designed as a one-way supported slab. A total of 36 HDPE hollow spherical plastic bubble balls with a 180mm diameter were placed in each bubble deck slab specimen. The high yield steel DA6 BRC reinforcement steel bar meshes and Grade-30 concrete were used for the slabs. The experimental results of the flexural performance of the reinforced bubble deck slab that were subjected to the static area and punching shear loadings are presented. The effect of the load applied in the experiments on the slabs such as flexural strength, bending stiffness and load-deflection behaviour were discussed including the crack propagation and crack pattern.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

211-223

Citation:

Online since:

March 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ACI 318-11. 2011. American Concrete Institute Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI318-11).

Google Scholar

[2] Ali Sabah Mahdi and Shatha Dehya Mohammed (2021). Structural Behaviour of BubbleDeck Slab Under Uniformly Distributed Load, Civil Engineering Journal (CEJ) 7 (2) pp.304-319.

DOI: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091655

Google Scholar

[3] Bhade, B.G. & Barelikar S.M. (2016) An Experiment Study on Two Way Bubble Deck Slab With Spherical Hollow Balls, International Journal of Recent Scientific Research (IJRSR) 7 (6).

Google Scholar

[4] British Standards Institution. 2009. BS EN 12390-3:2009 Testing Hardened Concrete Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens., British Standard.

Google Scholar

[5] Crow, J.M. (2008) The Concrete Conundrum., Chemistry World (March Edition) pp:62-66.

Google Scholar

[6] Dayang Siti Quraisyah, A.A., Magcellia, B., Kartini, K., Hamidah, M.S., (2019) Application of the Bubble Deck Slab Technology In Malaysia., Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal, 5 (1) pp.43-53.

Google Scholar

[7] Dayang Siti Quraisyah, A.A., Kartini. K., Hamidah, M.S. (2020) Comparative Study on Bubble Deck Slab and Conventional Reinforced Concrete Slab – A Review Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science 70 (1) pp.18-26.

DOI: 10.37934/arms.70.1.1826

Google Scholar

[8] Harshit, V. (2017). A Review Study on Bubble Deck Slab., International Journal For Research In Applied Science and Engineering Technology IJRASET, 5 (X).

Google Scholar

[9] Mir Shahed Ali & S.A. Amaresh Babu. (2019). A Structural Study on Bubble Deck Slab and Its Properties, International Journal of Research & Review (IJRR) 6 (10) pp.352-357.

Google Scholar

[10] Nagma Fatma & Vinaysingh Chandrakar (2018) To study Comparison Between Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab, International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology (IARJSET) 5 (1) pp.70-76.

Google Scholar

[11] N. Ranaivomanana, S. Multon, and A. Turatsinze (2013), Tensile, compressive and flexural basic creep of concrete at different stress levels,, Cement and Concrete Research, 52 p.1–10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.05.001

Google Scholar

[12] Rahul Biradar, Vishwa Nikam, Sagar Sonawane (2020). A Review of Comparative Study between Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7 (1).

Google Scholar

[13] Teja, P.P., Vijay, K.M., Anusha, S., Mounika, C.H. (2012) Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slab., IEEE – International Conference on Advances In Engineering, Science And Management (lCAESM) March 30 & 31 (2012) pp.383-388.

Google Scholar

[14] Tiwari, N., Zafar, S. (2016) Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slabs and Its Application: An Overview., International Journal For Scientific Research & Development (4) 2 pp.353-355.

Google Scholar

[15] Vakil, Raj R, and Mangulkar Madhuri Nilesh (2017) Comparative Study of Bubble Deck Slab and Solid Deck Slab – A Review, International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering (IJARSE) 6 (10) pp.383-392.

Google Scholar

[16] Victor Osaze Francis (2019) Suitability and Performance of Bubble Deck Slab: A Review International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends 5 (5) pp.1538-1542.

Google Scholar