Effect of Area Loading on Flexural Performance of Bubble Deck Slab

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reinforced bubble deck slab is a structural slab that contains high-density polyethene (HDPE) hollow spherical plastic bubble balls forming a slab with less concrete volume compared to the normal reinforced concrete slab. Reducing certain volumes of concrete from 30 to 50% will affect the performance of the slab structure in particular the flexural and shear capacity. Thus, in this research the effect of area loading on the flexural performance of bubble deck slabs is investigated by considering the slabs to be one-way supported slabs. The square deck slabs used were 1200mm by 1200mm for the width and length with a thickness of 230mm. A total of 36 HDPE hollow spherical plastic bubble balls with a 180mm diameter were placed in the bubble deck slab specimens which reduce significantly the structural self-weight. In this paper, the experimental results of the flexural performance of the reinforced bubble deck slab, (BD slab) compared with a conventional reinforced concrete slab, simply supported, subjected to static area loadings, are presented. The effect of the load applied in the experiments on the flexural strength, bending stiffness and load-deflection behaviour of both types of slabs have been discussed including the crack propagation and crack pattern. In general, the conventionally reinforced solid slab, simply supported (SS) has a 60.6% higher resistance against bending deformation than the reinforced bubble deck slab.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

41-54

Citation:

Online since:

March 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Crow, J.M. (2008) The Concrete Conundrum., Chemistry World (March Edition) pp:62-66.

Google Scholar

[2] Dayang Siti Quraisyah, A.A., Magcellia, B., Kartini, K., Hamidah, M.S., (2019) Application of the Bubble Deck Slab Technology In Malaysia., Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal, 5 (1) pp.43-53.

Google Scholar

[3] Harshit, V. (2017). A Review Study on Bubble Deck Slab., International Journal For Research In Applied Science and Engineering Technology IJRASET, 5 (X).

Google Scholar

[4] Teja, P.P., Vijay, K.M., Anusha, S., Mounika, C.H. (2012) Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slab., IEEE – International Conference on Advances In Engineering, Science And Management (lCAESM) March 30 & 31 (2012) pp.383-388.

Google Scholar

[5] Bhade, B.G. & Barelikar S.M. (2016) An Experiment Study on Two Way Bubble Deck Slab With Spherical Hollow Balls, International Journal of Recent Scientific Research (IJRSR) 7 (6).

Google Scholar

[6] Rahul Biradar, Vishwa Nikam, Sagar Sonawane (2020). A Review of Comparative Study between Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7 (1).

Google Scholar

[7] Shaunak, D. Chandekar, Satyajeet B. Chavat, Tirupati J. Khaple, Shubhangkar G. Pal, Ms Samiksha Kerkar (2020). A Review on Bubble Deck Slab, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7 (3).

Google Scholar

[8] Dayang Siti Quraisyah, A.A., Kartini. K., Hamidah, M.S. (2020) Comparative Study on Bubble Deck Slab and Conventional Reinforced Concrete Slab – A Review Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science 70 (1) pp.18-26.

DOI: 10.37934/arms.70.1.1826

Google Scholar

[9] Nagma Fatma & Vinaysingh Chandrakar (2018) To study Comparison Between Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab, International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology (IARJSET) 5 (1) pp.70-76.

Google Scholar

[10] Tiwari, N., Zafar, S. (2016) Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slabs and Its Application: An Overview., International Journal For Scientific Research & Development (4) 2 pp.353-355.

Google Scholar

[11] Vakil, Raj R, and Mangulkar Madhuri Nilesh (2017) Comparative Study of Bubble Deck Slab and Solid Deck Slab – A Review, International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering (IJARSE) 6 (10) pp.383-392.

Google Scholar

[12] Victor Osaze Francis (2019) Suitability and Performance of Bubble Deck Slab: A Review International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends 5 (5) pp.1538-1542.

Google Scholar

[13] Lai, T. (2010) Structural Behaviour of BubbleDeck Slabs And Their Application to Lightweight Bridge Deck., Thesis Master Massachusetts Institute Technology.

Google Scholar

[14] ACI 318-11. 2011. American Concrete Institute Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI318-11).

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM Standard C39/C 39M. 2016. Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens 1.', ASTM International.

Google Scholar