Enhancement of Fenton Performance at Near-Neutral pH by Using Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid for Anionic Surfactant Removal from a Laundry Wastewater

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fenton process involving Fe2+ ions and H2O2 produces OH radicals, that act as a strong oxidizing agent for degradation of a variety of organic pollutants. However the process is poor performance at neutral pH limiting its application for industrial wastewater treatment. The short coming problem, in the current study, is solved by introducing ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) as a complexing compound. The degradation was conducted through batch experiment, by varying EDTA concentration and pH. In addition, the Fe2+ and H2O2 concentrations, and the reaction time were optimized. The research results assign that the addition of EDTA could remarkably enhance the degradation of anionic surfactant, that was 96% at pH 6-8. The increase of the degradation was proportional to the concentrations of EDTA and 6 mg/L showed the optimum level. The highest degradation of 162 mg/L anionic surfactant in 20 mL of the laundry wastewater could be achieved within 30 mins by using Fe2+ 10 mM, H2O2 50 mM, and in the pre12sence of EDTA 6 mg/L at pH 7. Key words : Fenton, EDTA, degradation, surfactant, wastewater

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

57-62

Citation:

Online since:

May 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E.E. Ebrahiem, M.N. Al-Maghrabi, A.R. Mobarki, Removal of organic pollutants from industrial wastewater by applying photo-Fenton oxidation technology, Arabian J. Chem. 10 (2017) S1674–S1679.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.06.012

Google Scholar

[2] F.Z. Yehia, G. Eshaq, A.M. Rabie, A.H. Mady, A.E. ElMetwally, Phenol degradation by advanced Fenton process in combination with ultrasonic irradiation, Egypt. J. Pet. 24 (2015), 13–18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.002

Google Scholar

[3] S. Miralles-Cuevas, I. Oller, J.A.S. Pérez, S. Malato, Removal of pharmaceuticals from MWTP effluent by nanofiltration and solar photo-Fenton using two different iron complexes at neutral pH, Water Res. 64 (2014) 23–31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.06.032

Google Scholar

[4] E. Ortega-Gómez, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, M.M. Ballesteros Martín, M.I. Polo-López, B. Esteban García, J.A. Sánchez Pérez, Water disinfection using photo-Fenton: Effect of temperature on Enterococcus faecalis survival, Water Res. 46 (2012), 6154–6162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.007

Google Scholar

[5] A. Azhdarpoor, R. Hoseini, M. Dehghani, Leaching Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu from wastewater sludge using Fenton process, J. Health Sci. Surveill. Syst. 3 (2015), 153–159.

Google Scholar

[6] E.T. Wahyuni, R. Roto, M. Sabrina, V. Anggraini, N.F. Leswana, A.C. Veronita, Photodegradation of detergent anionic surfactant in wastewater using UV/TiO2/H2O2 and UV/Fe2+/H2O2 processes, Am. J. Appl. Chem. 4 (2016), 174.

Google Scholar

[7] E.T. Wahyuni, D. Siswanta, E.K. Kunarti, D. Supraba, S. Budiraharjo, Removal of Pb(II) ions in the aqueous solution by photo-Fenton method, Global NEST J. 21 (2019), 180–186.

DOI: 10.30955/gnj.002936

Google Scholar

[8] U.J. Ahile, R.A. Wuana, A.U. Itodo, R. Sha'Ato, R.F. Dantas, A review on the use of chelating agents as an alternative to promote photo-Fenton at neutral pH: Current trends, knowledge gap and future studies, Sci. Total Environ. 710 (2020), 134872.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134872

Google Scholar

[9] N. Kishimoto, T. Kitamura, M. Kato, H. Otsu, Influence of chelating agents on Fenton-type reaction using ferrous ion and hypochlorous acid, J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 11 (2013), 21–32.

DOI: 10.2965/jwet.2013.21

Google Scholar

[10] J.L. Buitrago, J. Sanabria, H.M. Gútierrez-Zapata, F.J. Urbano-Ceron, A. García-Barco, P. Osorio-Vargas, Julián A. Rengifo-Herrera, Photo-Fenton process at natural conditions of pH, iron, ions, and humic acids for degradation of diuron and amoxicillin, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (2020), 1608–1624.

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06700-y

Google Scholar

[11] F.Z. Yehia, M.H. Helal, O. Ali, A.M. Elfadly, A.H. Mady, A.A. Roshdy, Catalytic degradation of phenol using a different chelating agent at near-neutral pH in modified-Fenton process, Egypt. J. Chem. 56 (2013), 199–212.

DOI: 10.21608/ejchem.2013.1108

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Pan, H. Guo, M. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. Tian, W. Wang, EDTA enhanced removal of sulfamethazine by pre-magnetized Fe0 without oxidant addition, Chem. Eng. J. 372 (2019), 905–916.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.211

Google Scholar

[13] P. Villegas-Guzman, S. Giannakis, R.A. Torres-Palma, C. Pulgarin, Remarkable enhancement of bacterial inactivation in wastewater through the promotion of solar photo-Fenton at near-neutral pH by natural organic acids, Appl. Catal., B 205 (2017), 219–227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.021

Google Scholar

[14] G. Subramanian, G. Madras, Introducing saccharic acid as an efficient iron chelate to enhance photo-Fenton degradation of organic contaminants, Water Res. 104 (2016), 168–177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.070

Google Scholar

[15] K. O'Dowd, S.C. Pillai, Photo-Fenton disinfection at near-neutral pH: Process, parameter optimization and recent advances, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020), 104063.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104063

Google Scholar

[16] M.B. Miranzadeh, R. Zarjam, R. Dehghani, M. Haghighi, H.Z. Badi, M.A. Marzaleh, A.M. Tehrani, Comparison of Fenton and photo-Fenton processes for removal of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) from aqueous solutions, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 25 (2016), 1639–1648.

DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/61824

Google Scholar

[17] A. Jariyanorasade, S. Junyapoon, Factors affecting the degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate by TiO2 assisted photocatalysis and its kinetics, EnvironmentAsia 11 (2018), 45–60.

Google Scholar

[18] E.T. Wahyuni, I. Istiningsih, A. Suratman, Use of visible light for photodegradation of linear alkyl-benzene sulfonate in laundry wastewater over Ag-doped TiO2, J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13 (2020), 124–130.

DOI: 10.3923/jest.2020.124.130

Google Scholar