Polyhydroxyalkanoate Pellets as Novel Immobilization Medium for Phenol Biodegradation by Activated Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biofilm enhances the performances of biological wastewater treatment systems. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) pellets as novel biofilm carrier for phenol biodegradation. Two identical laboratory-scale reactors were operated with fill, react, settle, draw and idle periods in the ratio of 2:12:2:1:7 for a 24-h cycle. One reactor was supplemented with 2% (v/v) of PHA pellet and operated as sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR), whereas the other reactor was operated as sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and used as the control reactor. The performances of SBBR and SBR in degrading phenol were studied at three phases with the introduction of 300, 500 and 1000 mg L-1 phenol, respectively. The removal of phenol was found best described using zero-order kinetics, with R2 > 0.97. At all phases, the phenol removal rate during react period for SBBR (7.30 ± 0.55 to 9.33 ± 1.06 mg L-1 min-1) was found higher compared to those for SBR (4.28 ± 0.66 to 8.35 ± 0.68 mg L-1 min-1), with significance difference observed at low phenol concentration. Whereas for chemical oxygen demand biodegradation kinetics, SBRR exhibited significantly higher rate compared to SBR at all phases. From the scanning electron microscopy image, the attachment of activated sludge onto PHA pellet was observed. The results indicated the potential of PHA serving as alternative biofilm carrier in biofilm process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

51-56

Citation:

Online since:

May 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.P. Sam, H.T. Tan, K. Sudesh, R. Adnan, A.S.Y. Ting, S.L. Ng, Phenol and p-nitrophenol biodegradations by acclimated activated sludge: Influence of operational conditions on biodegradation kinetics and responding microbial communities, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 (2021) 105420.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105420

Google Scholar

[2] A. Priyadarshini, M.M. Sahoo, P.R. Raut, B. Mahanty, N.K. Sahoo, Kinetic modelling and process engineering of phenolics microbial and enzymatic biodegradation: A current outlook and challenges, J. Water Process Eng. 44 (2021) 102421.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102421

Google Scholar

[3] A. Dzionek, D. Wojcieszyńska, U. Guzik, Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review, Electron. J. Biotechnol. 23 (2016) 28–36.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.07.003

Google Scholar

[4] T. Mehrotra, S. Dev, A. Banerjee, A. Chatterjee, R. Singh, S. Aggarwal, Use of immobilized bacteria for environmental bioremediation: A review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 (2021) 105920.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105920

Google Scholar

[5] S.P. Sam, R. Adnan, S.L. Ng, Statistical optimization of immobilization of activated sludge in PVA/alginate cryogel beads using response surface methodology for p-nitrophenol biodegradation, J. Water Process Eng. 39 (2021) 101725.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101725

Google Scholar

[6] B.E. Rittmann, Biofilms, active substrata, and me, Water Res. 132 (2018) 135–145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.043

Google Scholar

[7] A.S. Oberoi, L. Philip, Performance evaluation of attached biofilm reactors for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with aromatic hydrocarbons and phenolic compounds, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017) 3852–3864.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.053

Google Scholar

[8] M. Ahmad, S. Liu, N. Mahmood, A. Mahmood, M. Ali, M. Zheng, J. Ni, Effects of porous carrier size on biofilm development, microbial distribution and nitrogen removal in microaerobic bioreactors, Bioresour. Technol. 234 (2017) 360–369.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.076

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Zhao, D. Liu, W. Huang, Y. Yang, M. Ji, L.D. Nghiem, Q.T. Trinh, N.H. Tran, Insights into biofilm carriers for biological wastewater treatment processes: Current state-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities, Bioresour. Technol. 288 (2019) 121619.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121619

Google Scholar

[10] G. Buitrón, I. Moreno-Andrade, Biodegradation kinetics of a mixture of phenols in a sequencing batch moving bed biofilm reactor under starvation and shock loads, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 86 (2011) 669–674.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2566

Google Scholar

[11] M. Mehrpouya, H. Vahabi, M. Barletta, P. Laheurte, V. Langlois, Additive manufacturing of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) biopolymers: Materials, printing techniques, and applications, Mater. Sci. Eng., C 127 (2021) 112216.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112216

Google Scholar

[12] B. Kunasundari, V. Murugaiyah, G. Kaur, F.H.J. Maurer, K. Sudesh, Revisiting the single cell protein application of Cupriavidus necator H16 and recovering bioplastic granules simultaneously, PLoS One 8 (2013) e78528.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078528

Google Scholar

[13] A. Hiraishi, S.T. Khan, Application of polyhydroxyalkanoates for denitrification in water and wastewater treatment, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61 (2003) 103–109.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-002-1198-y

Google Scholar

[14] American Public Health Association, Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wasterwater, 21st ed., American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, (2005).

DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1932.tb18153.x

Google Scholar

[15] S. Pradhan, A.J. Borah, M.K. Poddar, P.K. Dikshit, L. Rohidas, V.S. Moholkar, Microbial production, ultrasound-assisted extraction and characterization of biopolymer polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) from terrestrial (P. hysterophorus) and aquatic (E. crassipes) invasive weeds, Bioresour. Technol. 242 (2017) 304–310.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.117

Google Scholar

[16] M.A. Hassan, E.K. Bakhiet, S.G. Ali, H.R. Hussien, Production and characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) produced by Bacillus sp. isolated from Egypt, J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 6 (2016) 46–51.

DOI: 10.7324/japs.2016.60406

Google Scholar

[17] G.G. Biradar, C.T. Shivasharana, B.B. Kaliwal, Isolation and characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) producing Bacillus species from agricultural soil, Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 5 (2015) 58–65.

Google Scholar

[18] S.A. Mirbagheri, M. Bagheri, M. Ehteshami, Z. Bagheri, M. Pourasghar, Modeling of mixed liquor volatile suspended solids and performance evaluation for a sequencing batch reactor, J. Urban Environ. Eng. 9 (2015) 54–65.

DOI: 10.4090/juee.2015.v9n1.54-65

Google Scholar

[19] E.N. Banadda, I.Y. Smets, R. Jenné, J.F. Van Impe, Dynamic modeling of filamentous bulking in lab-scale activated sludge processes, IFAC Proc. Vol. 37 (2004) 383–388.

DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)31841-4

Google Scholar

[20] N.A. Yusoff, S.A. Ong, L.N. Ho, Y.S. Wong, F.N. Mohd Saad, W.F. Khalik, S.L. Lee, Evaluation of biodegradation process: Comparative study between suspended and hybrid microorganism growth system in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for removal of phenol, Biochem. Eng. J. 115 (2016) 14–22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.07.018

Google Scholar

[21] S.P. Sam, S.L. Ng, R. Adnan, Kinetics of biodegradation of phenol and p-nitrophenol by acclimated activated sludge, J. Phys. Sci. 29 (2018) 107–113.

Google Scholar