Evaluation of NaOH Activated, Ambient Cured Slag as a Binder to Produce a Building Material

Abstract:

The worldwide supply constraints and the anticipated high demand for sodium silicate as well as environmental issues associated with the use of sodium silicate has given dawn to the need to opt for alternative activating solutions such as alkali-hydroxides. The current study mainly focuses on the evaluation of mechanical and chemical properties of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) Binder-Spend Foundry Sand (SFS) based material toward the development of a durable material for building applications. Activated GGBFS was synthesized using a NaOH solution as the sole GGBFS activator. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) tests were conducted on the GGBFS-SFS based specimens to investigate the influence of varying amount of GGBFS binder (15 %- 45 %) cured at 80°C. Results showed that the specimen consisting of 45% GGBFS and 55% SFS at a solid to liquid of 0.17 yielded the high UCS equivalent to 11.07MPa. Increase in UCS has been attributed to the presence of calcium silicate hydrate phase confirmed by XRD analysis. In conclusion, GGBFS-based binder waste foundry-based material sand can be considered as a promising and efficacious building material as per ASTM C34-13, C129-14a and South African standard (SANS227: 2007).

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 922)
• Pages: 169-176
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-mdwg25
• Online since: June 2022
• Authors: Nastassia Thandiwe Sithole*, Joseph Makela Nseke
• Keywords: Alkali Activated Slag, Alkaline Activators, Geopolymer, Granulated Furnace Slag, Microstructure, Unconfined Compressive Strength

References

[1] Mohajerani, A., Suter, D., Jeffrey-Bailey, T., Song, T., Arulrajah, A., Horpibulsuk, S. and Law, D., 2019. Recycling waste materials in geopolymer concrete. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(3), pp.493-515.

DOI: 10.1007/s10098-018-01660-2

[2] Singh, N.B., 2018. Fly ash-based geopolymer binder: A future construction material. Minerals, 8(7), p.299.

DOI: 10.3390/min8070299

[3] Sithole, N.T., Okonta, F. and Ntuli, F., 2019. Development of lightweight construction blocks by alkaline activation of bof slag. The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 45(2), pp.175-185.

DOI: 10.5276/jswtm/2019.175

[4] ] Hamdi, N., Ben Messaoud, I. & Srasra, E. 2019. Production of geopolymer binders using clay minerals and industrial wastes. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 22, 220-226.

DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2018.11.010

[5] Zhang, P., Wang, K., Li, Q., Wang, J. & Ling, Y. 2020b. Fabrication and engineering properties of concretes based on geopolymers/alkali-activated binders - a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120896.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120896

[6] Sithole, N.T. and Mashifana, T., 2020. Geosynthesis of building and construction materials through alkaline activation of granulated blast furnace slag. Construction and Building Materials, 264, p.120712.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120712

[7] Villaquirán-Caicedo, M. A. 2019. Studying different silica sources for preparation of alternative waterglass used in preparation of binary geopolymer binders from metakaolin/boiler slag. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.002

[8] Nath, S. K. & Kumar, S. 2019. Role of alkali concentration on reaction kinetics of fly ash geopolymerization. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 505, 241-251.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.11.007

[9] Djobo, J.N.Y., Elimbi, A., Tchakouté, H.K. and Kumar, S., 2016. Mechanical properties and durability of volcanic ash based geopolymer mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 124, pp.606-614.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.141

[10] Assi, L.N., Carter, K., Deaver, E. and Ziehl, P., 2020. Review of availability of source materials for geopolymer/sustainable concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, p.121477.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121477

[11] Malhotra, S.K. and Tehri, S.P., 1996. Development of bricks from granulated blast furnace slag. Construction and Building Materials, 10(3), pp.191-193.

DOI: 10.1016/0950-0618(95)00081-x

[12] Winnipeg Management Emission Factors in kg CO2 equivalent per Unit,, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.winnipeg.ca/finance/findata/matmgt/documents/2012/682-2012/682-2012_Appendix_H-WSTP_South_End_Plant_Process_Selection_Report/Appendix%207.pdf. [Accessed 09 october 2021].

[13] Kiza Rusati, P. & Song, K.-I. 2018. Magnesium chloride and sulfate attacks on gravel-sand-cement-inorganic binder mixture. Construction and Building Materials, 187, 565-571.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.149

[14] Yasaswini, K. and Rao, A.V., 2020. Behaviour of geopolymer concrete at elevated temperature. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, pp.239-244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.833

[15] Holtzer, M., Górny, M. and Dańko, R., 2016. Microstructure and properties of ductile iron and compacted graphite iron castings: the effects of mold sand/metal interface phenomena. Springer.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14583-9

[16] Mashifana, T. and Sithole, T., 2020. Recovery of Silicon Dioxide from Waste Foundry Sand and Alkaline Activation of Desilicated Foundry Sand. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 6(4), pp.700-714.

DOI: 10.1007/s40831-020-00303-5

[17] Winkler, E.S. and Bol'shakov, A.A., 2000. Characterization of foundry sand waste. MA: Chelsea Centre for Recycling and Economic Development, University of Massachusetts.

[18] Siddique, R., De Schutter, G. and Noumowe, A., 2009. Effect of used-foundry sand on the mechanical properties of concrete. Construction and building materials, 23(2), pp.976-980.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.005

[19] Falayi, T., 2016. Desilication of fly ash and geotechnical applications of the desilicated fly ash (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg).

[20] Bhardwaj, B. & Kumar, P. 2017. Waste foundry sand in concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 156, 661-674.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.010

[21] Apithanyasai, S., Supakata, N. & Papong, S. 2020. The potential of industrial waste: using foundry sand with fly ash and electric arc furnace slag for geopolymer brick production. Heliyon, 6, e03697.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03697

[22] Doğan-Sağlamtimur, N., 2018. Waste foundry sand usage for building material production: A first geopolymer record in material reuse. Advances in Civil Engineering, (2018).

DOI: 10.1155/2018/1927135

[23] Nazari, A. & Sanjayan, J. G. 2015. Hybrid effects of alumina and silica nanoparticles on water absorption of geopolymers: Application of taguchi approach. Measurement, 60, 240-246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.10.004

[24] Ren, W., Xu, J., Liu, J. & Su, H. 2015. Dynamic mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete after water immersion. Ceramics International, 41, 11852-11860.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.154

[25] Givi, A. N., Rashid, S. A., Aziz, F. N. A. & Salleh, M. a. M. 2010. Assessment of the effects of rice husk ash particle size on strength, water permeability and workability of binary blended concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 2145-2150.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.045

[26] Harbec, D., Zidol, A., Tagnit-Hamou, A. & Gitzhofer, F. 2017. Mechanical and durability properties of high-performance glass fume concrete and mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 134, 142-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.018

[27] Dudek, M. & Sitarz, M. 2020. Analysis of changes in the microstructure of geopolymer mortar after exposure to high temperatures. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 13, 4263.

DOI: 10.3390/ma13194263